Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Non-Hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing

Nature volume 606, pages 82–87 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 31 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Imposing chirality on a physical system engenders unconventional energy flow and responses, such as the Aharonov–Bohm effect1 and the topological quantum Hall phase for electrons in a symmetry-breaking magnetic field. Recently, great interest has arisen in combining that principle with broken Hermiticity to explore novel topological phases and applications2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Here we report phononic states with unique symmetries and dynamics that are formed when combining the controlled breaking of time-reversal symmetry with non-Hermitian dynamics. Both of these are induced through time-modulated radiation pressure forces in small nano-optomechanical networks. We observe chiral energy flow among mechanical resonators in a synthetic dimension and Aharonov–Bohm tuning of their eigenmodes. Introducing particle-non-conserving squeezing interactions, we observe a non-Hermitian Aharonov–Bohm effect in ring-shaped networks in which mechanical quasiparticles experience parametric gain. The resulting complex mode spectra indicate flux-tuning of squeezing, exceptional points, instabilities and unidirectional phononic amplification. This rich phenomenology points the way to exploring new non-Hermitian topological bosonic phases and applications in sensing and transport that exploit spatiotemporal symmetry breaking.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Aharonov–Bohm interference in a Hermitian nano-optomechanical network.
Fig. 2: Aharonov–Bohm interference along non-Hermitian squeezing loops.
Fig. 3: Flux control of non-Hermitian dynamical phases.
Fig. 4: Chirality in a non-Hermitian network.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data in this study are available from the Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6320519.

Change history

References

  1. Cohen, E. et al. Geometric phase from Aharonov–Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 437–449 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergholtz, E. J., Budich, J. C. & Kunst, F. K. Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Coulais, C., Fleury, R. & van Wezel, J. Topology and broken Hermiticity. Nat. Phys. 17, 9–13 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lieu, S. Topological symmetry classes for non-Hermitian models and connections to the bosonic Bogoliubov–de Gennes equation. Phys. Rev. B 98, 115135 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong, Z. et al. Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. St-Jean, P. et al. Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice. Nat. Photonics 11, 651–656 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, B. et al. Non-Hermitian topological whispering gallery. Nature 597, 655–659 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeuner, J. M. et al. Observation of a topological transition in the bulk of a non-Hermitian system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 040402 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnett, R. Edge-state instabilities of bosons in a topological band. Phys. Rev. A 88, 063631 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peano, V., Houde, M., Brendel, C., Marquardt, F. & Clerk, A. A. Topological phase transitions and chiral inelastic transport induced by the squeezing of light. Nat. Commun. 7, 10779 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Peano, V., Houde, M., Marquardt, F. & Clerk, A. A. Topological quantum fluctuations and traveling wave amplifiers. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041026 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bandres, M. A. et al. Topological insulator laser: experiments. Science 359, eaar4005 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghatak, A., Brandenbourger, M., van Wezel, J. & Coulais, C. Observation of non-Hermitian topology and its bulk–edge correspondence in an active mechanical metamaterial. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29561–29568 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Helbig, T. et al. Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian topolectrical circuits. Nat. Phys. 16, 747–750 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weidemann, S. et al. Topological funneling of light. Science 368, 311–314 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, K. et al. Generating arbitrary topological windings of a non-Hermitian band. Science 371, 1240–1245 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sliwa, K. M. et al. Reconfigurable Josephson circulator/directional amplifier. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruesink, F., Miri, M.-A., Alù, A. & Verhagen, E. Nonreciprocity and magnetic-free isolation based on optomechanical interactions. Nat. Commun. 7, 13662 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fang, K. et al. Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering. Nat. Phys. 13, 465–471 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mercier de Lépinay, L., Ockeloen-Korppi, C. F., Malz, D. & Sillanpää, M. A. Nonreciprocal transport based on cavity Floquet modes in optomechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 023603 (2020).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huber, S. D. Topological mechanics. Nat. Phys. 12, 621–623 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozawa, T. et al. Topological photonics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miri, M.-A. & Alù, A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Özdemir, S. K., Rotter, S., Nori, F. & Yang, L. Parity–time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics. Nat. Mater. 18, 783–798 (2019).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Y. X. & Clerk, A. A. Non-Hermitian dynamics without dissipation in quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 99, 063834 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Flynn, V. P., Cobanera, E. & Viola, L. Deconstructing effective non-Hermitian dynamics in quadratic bosonic Hamiltonians. New J. Phys. 22, 083004 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McDonald, A., Pereg-Barnea, T. & Clerk, A. A. Phase-dependent chiral transport and effective non-Hermitian dynamics in a bosonic Kitaev–Majorana chain. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041031 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wanjura, C. C., Brunelli, M. & Nunnenkamp, A. Topological framework for directional amplification in driven-dissipative cavity arrays. Nat. Commun. 11, 3149 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, H., Jiang, L., Clerk, A. A. & Harris, J. G. E. Nonreciprocal control and cooling of phonon modes in an optomechanical system. Nature 568, 65–69 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mathew, J. P., del Pino, J. & Verhagen, E. Synthetic gauge fields for phonon transport in a nano-optomechanical system. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 198–202 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Koutserimpas, T. T. & Fleury, R. Non-reciprocal gain in non-Hermitian time-Floquet systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 087401 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roushan, P. et al. Chiral ground-state currents of interacting photons in a synthetic magnetic field. Nat. Phys. 13, 146–151 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Habraken, S. J., Stannigel, K., Lukin, M. D., Zoller, P. & Rabl, P. Continuous mode cooling and phonon routers for phononic quantum networks. New J. Phys. 14, 115004 (2012).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Huber, J. S. et al. Spectral evidence of squeezing of a weakly damped driven nanomechanical mode. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021066 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Downing, C. A., Zueco, D. & Martín-Moreno, L. Chiral current circulation and \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry in a trimer of oscillators. ACS Photonics 7, 3401–3414 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang, W. et al. Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant. Science 370, 1077–1080 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Hodaei, H. et al. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points. Nature 548, 187–191 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lau, H.-K. & Clerk, A. A. Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing. Nat. Commun. 9, 4320 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahboob, I., Okamoto, H. & Yamaguchi, H. An electromechanical Ising Hamiltonian. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600236 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ozawa, T., Price, H. M., Goldman, N., Zilberberg, O. & Carusotto, I. Synthetic dimensions in integrated photonics: from optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum Hall physics. Phys. Rev. A 93, 043827 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Goldman, N., Budich, J. & Zoller, P. Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices. Nat. Phys. 12, 639–645 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Reiter, F. & Sørensen, A. S. Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 85, 032111 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fang, K., Yu, Z. & Fan, S. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat. Photonics 6, 782–787 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mahboob, I., Okamoto, H., Onomitsu, K. & Yamaguchi, H. Two-mode thermal-noise squeezing in an electromechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 167203 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Leuch, A. et al. Parametric symmetry breaking in a nonlinear resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 214101 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Calvanese Strinati, M., Bello, L., Pe’er, A. & Dalla Torre, E. G. Theory of coupled parametric oscillators beyond coupled Ising spins. Phys. Rev. A 100, 023835 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bello, L., Calvanese Strinati, M., Dalla Torre, E. G. & Pe’er, A. Persistent coherent beating in coupled parametric oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 083901 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Slemrod, M. Review: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. J. Appl. Mech. 51, 947 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gardiner, C. & Zoller, P. Quantum Noise (Springer, 2004).

  51. Blaizot, J.-P. & Ripka, G. Quantum Theory of Finite Systems (MIT Press, 1986).

  52. Rossignoli, R. & Kowalski, A. M. Complex modes in unstable quadratic bosonic forms. Phys. Rev. A 72, 032101 (2005).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Aranas, E. B., Javed Akram, M., Malz, D. & Monteiro, T. S. Quantum noise spectra for periodically driven cavity optomechanics. Phys. Rev. A 96, 063836 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Richards, J. A. Analysis of Periodically Time-Varying Systems (Springer, 2012).

  55. Bender, C. M. & Boettcher, S. Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Rüter, C. E. et al. Observation of parity–time symmetry in optics. Nat. Phys. 6, 192–195 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ornigotti, M. & Szameit, A. Quasi \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\)-symmetry in passive photonic lattices. J. Opt. 16, 065501 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Li, H., Mekawy, A., Krasnok, A. & Alù, A. Virtual parity-time symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 193901 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Heiss, W. D. The physics of exceptional points. J. Phys. A 45, 444016 (2012).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Moiseyev, N. Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

  61. Koch, J., Houck, A. A., Hur, K. L. & Girvin, S. M. Time-reversal symmetry breaking in circuit-QED-based photon lattices. Phys. Rev. A 82, 043811 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ranzani, L. & Aumentado, J. Graph-based analysis of nonreciprocity in coupled-mode systems. New J. Phys. 17, 023024 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Takata, K. et al. Observing exceptional point degeneracy of radiation with electrically pumped photonic crystal coupled-nanocavity lasers. Optica 8, 184 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Leijssen, R. & Verhagen, E. Strong optomechanical interactions in a sliced photonic crystal nanobeam. Sci Rep. 5, 15974 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Leijssen, R., La Gala, G. R., Freisem, L., Muhonen, J. T. & Verhagen, E. Nonlinear cavity optomechanics with nanomechanical thermal fluctuations. Nat. Commun. 8, 16024 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hauer, B. D., Clark, T. J., Kim, P. H., Doolin, C. & Davis, J. P. Dueling dynamical backaction in a cryogenic optomechanical cavity. Phys. Rev. A 99, 053803 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Frimmer, M. & Novotny, L. The classical Bloch equations. Am. J. Phys. 82, 947–954 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Wanjura, A. Nunnenkamp and M. Brunelli for discussions, and M. Serra-Garcia, S. Rodriguez, F. Koenderink and O. Zilberberg for critical reading of the manuscript. This work is part of the research programme of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). We acknowledge support from the European Research Council (ERC starting grant no. 759644-TOPP) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 732894 (FET Proactive HOT). J.d.P. acknowledges financial support from the ETH Fellowship programme (grant no. 20-2 FEL-66).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Javier del Pino, Jesse J. Slim

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Nanophotonics, AMOLF, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Javier del Pino, Jesse J. Slim & Ewold Verhagen

  2. Institute for Theoretical Physics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Javier del Pino

Authors
  1. Javier del Pino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse J. Slim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ewold Verhagen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.d.P. developed the theoretical framework. J.J.S. fabricated the sample, performed the experiments, analysed the data and aided in constructing the theoretical approach. E.V. conceived and supervised the project. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Javier del Pino or Ewold Verhagen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Estimation of beamsplitter interaction strengths.

a, Mode splitting induced by a beamsplitter interaction observed in thermomechanical spectra. Each column corresponds to a beamsplitter interaction induced between a pair of resonators i ↔ j (left: 1 ↔ 2, middle: 2 ↔ 3, right: 1 ↔ 3) by a single drive laser modulation at frequency Δωij = ωi − ωj, where ωi,j is the frequency of resonator i, j. Thermomechanical spectra (top row: resonator i, bottom row: resonator j) are recorded for increasing modulation depth cm. The linear relationship \({J}_{{\rm{est}}}={c}_{{\rm{m}}}\sqrt{{\rm{\delta }}{\omega }_{i}{\rm{\delta }}{\omega }_{j}}/2\) is used to estimate the coupling strength Jest (top axis) from cm, where δωi,j is the optical spring shift of mode i, j. The estimated mode splitting (dashed) is slightly larger than observed, presumably due to frequency-dependent transduction (at d.c. and frequency Δωij) in the measurement of cm. The difference is quantified by extracting Lorentzian peak frequencies from the spectra and subsequently fitting those linearly against modulation depth, and results in an observed mode splitting slope that is 78%, 90% and 90% of the estimated slope, respectively. The average estimation offset of 86% is applied to all (beamsplitter and squeezing) interaction strength calculations in our experiments. b, Time evolution of the coherent amplitude (in units of their zero-point fluctuations xzpf) of a pair of resonators (1, blue and 2, red) coupled through a beamsplitter interaction (strength J/(2π) = 5 kHz). Resonator 1 is initially (time t < 0) driven to a high-amplitude steady state by a coherent drive laser modulation. At t = 0, the drive is switched off and the interaction is switched on. Rabi oscillations induced by the coupling interaction are observed, where energy is transferred back and forth between the resonators until the coherent energy in the resonators is dissipated. These dynamics illustrate the possibility for a transfer scheme in the strong-coupling regime where couplings are interrupted after a Rabi semi-cycle, that is, a time tπ = π/(2J). The energy transfer efficiency for this process can be calculated67 to be ~64% for corresponding parameters and 70% for the coupling rates presented in Fig. 1.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Frequency and linewidth modulation in the squeezing dimer.

a, Experimental resonance frequencies (top) and linewidths (bottom) obtained by fitting a superposition of Lorentzian lineshapes to the thermomechanical spectra in Fig. 3c, d. Grey curves indicate theoretical values of Re(ϵ) (top) and Im(ϵ) (bottom). Two peaks were fitted to the spectra for Φ = 0 (left), as for that flux both eigenvalues are expected to be doubly degenerate for all J. The observed branching of frequencies and linewidths is characteristic of an exceptional point. Four peaks were instead fitted for Φ = π (middle), where the exceptional-point behaviour completely vanishes, and spectra are fitted well with a combination of broad and narrow peaks at two frequencies. When varying flux in the rightmost panel, the grey shaded areas depict the regions near Φ = 0, π where a fit of two peaks provided better results than a fit of four. Note that near the exceptional point, the non-Lorentzian nature of the spectrum causes the fitted values of the Lorentzian linewidths to deviate from the theoretical Im(ϵ). This origin of the deviation is confirmed by applying the same fit procedure to theoretically predicted spectra (inset, bottom left), which shows the same deviation. Error estimation is described in Methods section ‘Error estimation’. b, Thermomechanical spectra for several values of J/η, for Φ = 0 (blue) and Φ = π (red). Solid lines show Lorentzian fits. c, As in b, but for different values of Φ at J = η.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Network graph representation of general quadratic Hamiltonians.

Schematic of an arbitrary Hamiltonian matrix \( {\mathcal H} \), acting on a Nambu-like vector \({\boldsymbol{\alpha }}=({a}_{1},{a}_{2},\cdots ,{a}_{N},{a}_{1}^{\dagger },{a}_{2}^{\dagger },\cdots ,{a}_{N}^{\dagger })\). Particle annihilation (hole creation) operators, ai, are represented by blue nodes, and hole annihilation (particle creation) operators are represented by orange nodes. \( {\mathcal H} \) includes excitation-conserving interactions (matrix \({\mathscr{A}}\)), which link particle operators (for example, terms \({{\mathscr{A}}}_{ij}{a}_{i}^{\dagger }{a}_{j}\)) and hole operators (for example, terms \({{\mathscr{A}}}_{ji}^{\ast }{a}_{j}{a}_{i}^{\dagger }\)). Squeezing interactions (with complex amplitude matrix \( {\mathcal B} \)) contain pairs \({ {\mathcal B} }_{ij}{a}_{i}^{\dagger }{a}_{j}^{\dagger }\) that can be visualized to either annihilate two particles i, j or to annihilate a particle in i and create hole in j, hence the connection between particle and hole networks (green). Mutatis mutandis, terms \({ {\mathcal B} }_{ij}^{\ast }{a}_{i}{a}_{j}\) can be similarly visualized.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Calculated eigenstates of the \({{\boldsymbol{a}}}_{{\bf{1}}},{{\boldsymbol{a}}}_{{\bf{2}}},{{\boldsymbol{a}}}_{{\bf{3}}}^{\dagger }\) loop in the singly conjugated trimer studied in Fig. 4.

a, Phase diagram for the imaginary part of the eigenfrequencies, showing the stability-to-instability boundary in ξ–Φ space, where \(\xi =J/(2\sqrt{2}\eta )\) and γi = 0. Such boundary is associated with a second-order exceptional contour. b, Cuts of the eigenfrequency Riemann surfaces along Φ = 0, shown as a red dashed trajectory in the phase diagram, as a function of the ratio \(\xi =J/(2\sqrt{2}\eta )\). The squared weights of the J = 0 eigenstates in the full eigenvectors are shown in the colour scale. The weights are calculated from the symplectic projections (Σz product) on the gainy/lossy combinations ag, al and the passive mode a−. A second-order exceptional point (denoted EP2), found for \(J=2\sqrt{2}\eta \), is highlighted. As \(J < 2\sqrt{2}\eta \), \({{\mathscr{P}}}_{{\rm{gl}}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry is spontaneously broken, inducing eigenstate localization. The antisymmetric 1–2 mode a− is detached from this mechanism and remains uncoupled. Real and imaginary parts are rescaled by η. c, As in b, but along the cut Φ = π/2 (corresponding to the blue dashed line in a, which shows the third-order exceptional point (EP3, at \(J=\sqrt{2}\eta \)). The \({{\mathscr{P}}}_{{\rm{gl}}}{\mathscr{T}}\)-symmetry broken states are now hybrid combinations of ag/a− and al/a− modes. Such combinations break \({{\mathscr{P}}}_{12}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry as well, as explained in the text.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Experimental set-up.

a, Electron micrograph (left, tilt 45°; inset, top view) showing a device as used in our experiments. In the top silicon device layer (thickness 220 nm), three suspended beams are defined with teeth separated by a narrow slit (~50 nm). Between each outer beam and the central beam, a photonic crystal cavity is defined that hosts an optical mode (right, simulated electric field y component, Ey). The mode’s energy is strongly confined to the narrow slits, inducing large parametric interaction with flexural mechanical resonances of the two beams. The cavity’s off-centre position ensures coupling to both even and odd resonances. In the presented experiments, we only use one of the two cavities. The widths of the outer beams’ straight sections are intentionally made unequal, such that the mechanical resonances of all beams are detuned. The top layer is supported by pedestals etched out in the buried silicon oxide layer. b, Schematic of the experimental set-up. The ultrahigh-frequency lock-in amplifier (LIA) ports serve to (Out) drive the intensity modulator through an amplification stage (not shown) and to (In) analyse intensity modulations of the drive laser (for calibration) and detection laser. For time-resolved measurements, the signal generator (SG) is programmed to (Out) actuate the drive signal switches and trigger the lock-in amplifier acquisition. The digital signal processor (DSP) optionally generates a feedback signal to modify resonator damping rates. BPF, optical bandpass filter; IM, intensity modulator; LP, linear polarizer; PBS, polarizing beamsplitter; PD1, PD2, photodiodes; SWs, microwave switches.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Optical spring shift and opto-thermal backaction.

a, Thermomechanical noise spectra of the first few mechanical modes imprinted on an unmodulated single drive/detection laser, as the laser’s frequency (ωL) is swept across the cavity resonance. The four most intense peaks around frequencies ωi/(2π) ≈ {3.7, 5.3, 12.8, 17.6} MHz correspond to flexural modes (labelled i) of the individual beam halves and show frequency-tuning characteristic to the optical spring effect, and the other peaks represent nonlinearly transduced harmonics of those modes.65. PSD, power spectral density.b, Magnification of the PSD of the first four resonators. c, From the spectra in b, resonance frequencies ωi (blue circles) and linewidths γi (red circles) are extracted. The resonance frequencies are fitted using the standard optical spring model (solid blue). Across all resonators, we find agreement in the fitted cavity resonance ωc/(2π) = 195.62 THz and linewidth κ/(2π) = 320 GHz (Q factor, Q ≈ 600). The small sideband resolution ωi/κ ≈ 10−5 suggests very little change in linewidth due to dynamical cavity backaction (dashed red). The linewidth modulations we observe suggest the presence of an opto-thermal retardation effect66. Displayed errors correspond to fit uncertainty, smaller than plot markers on the fitted frequencies (Methods section ‘Error estimation’). On each panel, blue/red colour-coded arrows indicate the y scale for each plotted quantity. d, Drive laser frequency sweep, now using a separate, fixed-frequency, far-detuned detection laser. The fixed transduction of mechanical motion onto this detection laser allows a comparison of resonance peak area Ai(ωL) versus linewidth γi(ωL) as the drive laser frequency ωL is varied (a.u., arbitrary units). The resonance peak area of mode i is proportional to the variance \(\langle {X}_{i}^{2}\rangle \) of its displacement xi, which is proportional to its temperature Ti. Dynamical backaction modifies the effective mode temperature through \({T}_{i}={T}_{0}({\tilde{\gamma }}_{i}/{\gamma }_{i})\) (ref. 29), where T0 is the initial temperature and \({\tilde{\gamma }}_{i}\) is the mode’s intrinsic linewidth, determined by switching off the drive laser. Our data are well explained by linear fits of Ai(ωL) versus \({\tilde{\gamma }}_{i}/{\gamma }_{i}({\omega }_{{\rm{L}}})\) (dashed), confirming the effective temperature model.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Single-mode squeezing and linewidth modulation by parametric driving.

a, Parametric gain induced by a single-mode squeezing interaction observed in thermomechanical spectra. Each row corresponds to a separate experiment where resonator i (1 through 4) is subjected to a single-mode squeezing interaction of strength η. As η is increased, the resonance transitions from the broad intrinsic linewidth to a narrow parametric resonance. b, The phase-space distribution of the thermal fluctuations of resonator i (left: 3; right: 4) subject to a single-mode squeezing interaction of strength η/(2π) = 1 kHz with squeezing angle θ = π/2 reveals a squeezed thermal state. The squeezed (anti-squeezed) quadrature X (Y), measured in units of the thermal equilibrium amplitude \(\sqrt{{\bar{n}}_{i}}\), are referenced using the propagation delay (Methods). c, Fitted Lorentzian full-width at half-maximum linewidths of the resonances shown in a. Even though a superposition of two degenerate resonances is expected—a broadened resonance of the anti-squeezed quadrature and a narrowed resonance of the squeezed quadrature—only a single one can be successfully fitted in each spectrum. This reflects the fact that the highly populated narrowed resonance dominates the broadened resonance. As the parametric gain η is increased, each resonator’s squeezed quadrature linewidth is expected to decrease by Δγ = −2η (dashed lines), until parametric threshold is reached at η = γi/2, where γi is the intrinsic linewidth of resonator i. The fitted linewidths follow the expected trend quite closely for intermediate η, whereas for lower η the narrow resonance is presumably not yet fully dominant and for larger η high-amplitude nonlinear effects are prominent. Error bars correspond to the fit uncertainty, and are smaller than the symbol size in most points (Methods section ‘Error estimation’).

Extended Data Fig. 8 Damping rate adjustment by feedback.

Resonator thermomechanical spectra (top row) and fitted full-width half-maximum linewidths (bottom row) adjusted by feeding back electronically filtered and phase-shifted resonator displacement signals onto the drive laser modulation (left two columns, resonator 1; right two columns, resonator 2). The resonator linewidth (circles) and frequency shift (crosses) vary sinusoidally with the feedback phase ϕfb (odd columns). By fitting the linewidth variation (solid black), the optimal phase shift to increase the damping rate is selected. The frequency variation (dashed grey) expected from the fitted linewidth modulation, relative to the resonator frequency with feedback off (dashed red), lags by π/2 radians. For the optimal feedback phase shift, an increase in linewidth is observed for increasing gain G, whereas the resonator frequency remains unaffected (even columns). The slope of the linear fit (solid black) can be used when setting a resonator’s linewidth to a desired value. Error bars reflect the fit uncertainty and control parameter stability, and are typically smaller than the plot marker size (Methods section ‘Error estimation’).

Extended Data Fig. 9 Resonator coherent response.

a, Amplitude |ai| (blue, left axis) and phase ϕi (red, right axis) of the complex response \({a}_{i}({\Delta })={{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}({\phi }_{i}({\Delta })+{\alpha }_{i})}|{a}_{i}({\Delta })|\) of resonators 1 through 4 (resonance frequencies ωi) to a drive laser modulation at a frequency ωd close to resonance (drive detuning Δ = ωd − ωi). αi is the phase offset due to signal delay through the set-up. A Lorentzian response \({a}_{i}={{\rm{e}}}^{{\rm{i}}{\alpha }_{i}}{A}_{i}\frac{{\gamma }_{i}/2}{{\rm{i}}{\gamma }_{i}/2-{\Delta }}\) is fitted to the data (dashed). b, Phase offset αi versus resonance frequency ωi/(2π). A linear fit (dashed) of αi = −ωiτ implies a signal delay τ = 106.7 ns. Error bars in a reflect the spread in repeated measurement, whereas the error bars in b correspond to fit uncertainty and are smaller than the symbol size (Methods section ‘Error estimation’). a.u., arbitrary units.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Tunable single-mode and effective two-mode squeezing in the squeezing dimer.

a, Intra-resonator squeezing as a function of the beamsplitter coupling J. Two values Φ = 0, π of the flux are shown for equal single-mode squeezing strengths η1 = η2 = 0.5 kHz. The level of single-mode squeezing is expressed by the ratio of the smallest (\(\Delta {R}_{{\rm{sq}}}^{2}\)) and largest (\(\Delta {R}_{{\rm{a}}}^{2}\)) eigenvalues of the covariance matrix of the quadrature amplitudes recorded for each resonator. These eigenvalues indicate the amplitude variance along the squeezed and anti-squeezed principal quadrature components, respectively. For Φ = π, where the squeezed (anti-squeezed) quadratures Xi (Yi) of both resonators are coupled (see Fig. 2d), the slight initial imbalance in variance ratio is reduced as J increases while the value of the variance ratio remains low. By contrast, for Φ = 0—when the squeezed quadrature Xi in one resonator is coupled to the anti-squeezed quadrature Yj in the other—we observe cancellation of single-mode squeezing as the variance ratio tends to 1 with increasing J. This agrees well with theory (dashed line), where for simplicity we have assumed equal dissipation rates \(\bar{\gamma }=2.2\,{\rm{kHz}}\) equal to the average of the experimental losses γi = {2.6, 1.9} kHz, as well as equal bath occupations. Owing to dynamical (optothermal) backaction, for this particular experiment the effective bath occupations \({\bar{n}}_{1}\approx {\bar{n}}_{2}\) only differed by a few per cent. b, Two-mode squeezing observed in the cross-resonator amplitude distribution of quadratures X1 and Y2 for Φ = 0, J = 3.5 kHz and η1 = η2 = 0.5 kHz. The dashed ellipse depicts the standard deviation of the principal components of the quadrature covariance matrix and shows positive correlations between X1 and Y2 (covariance σ(X1, Y2) = 0.08). c, Covariance of the coupled quadrature pairs X1Y2 and Y1X2 as a function of J, with η1 = η2 = 0.5 kHz. No correlations are found for flux Φ = π, when single-mode squeezing is strongest and independent of J (compare with a). However, for Φ = 0, positive correlations σ(X1, Y2), σ(Y1, X2) > 0 are found when J is increased, as predicted by theory (dashed line). A trade-off between the squeezing axes rotation towards the standard two-mode squeezing limit and the decrease in the overall squeezing level as J is increased leads to a maximum covariance (although not optimal squeezing level for the rotated quadratures) at a coupling Jopt. For the simple theory model with equal dissipation and bath occupation that we use it is given by \({J}_{{\rm{opt}}}^{2}=({\gamma }^{2}-4{\eta }^{2})/4\). Error bars in a and c reflect statistical uncertainty and control parameter stability (Methods section ‘Error estimation’).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text, Supplementary Equations, Supplementary Figures and Supplementary References

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

del Pino, J., Slim, J.J. & Verhagen, E. Non-Hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing. Nature 606, 82–87 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04609-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04609-0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing