Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Synthesis of paracrystalline diamond

Nature volume 599, pages 605–610 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Solids in nature can be generally classified into crystalline and non-crystalline states1,2,3,4,5,6,7, depending on whether long-range lattice periodicity is present in the material. The differentiation of the two states, however, could face fundamental challenges if the degree of long-range order in crystals is significantly reduced. Here we report a paracrystalline state of diamond that is distinct from either crystalline or amorphous diamond8,9,10. The paracrystalline diamond reported in this work, consisting of sub-nanometre-sized paracrystallites that possess a well-defined crystalline medium-range order up to a few atomic shells4,5,11,12,13, was synthesized in high-pressure high-temperature conditions (for example, 30 GPa and 1,600 K) employing face-centred cubic C60 as a precursor. The structural characteristics of the paracrystalline diamond were identified through a combination of X-ray diffraction, high-resolution transmission microscopy and advanced molecular dynamics simulation. The formation of paracrystalline diamond is a result of densely distributed nucleation sites developed in compressed C60 as well as pronounced second-nearest-neighbour short-range order in amorphous diamond due to strong sp3 bonding. The discovery of paracrystalline diamond adds an unusual diamond form to the enriched carbon family14,15,16, which exhibits distinguishing physical properties and can be furthered exploited to develop new materials. Furthermore, this work reveals the missing link in the length scale between amorphous and crystalline states across the structural landscape, having profound implications for recognizing complex structures arising from amorphous materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Synthesizing fully sp3-bonded carbon samples at 30 GPa and 1,200–1,600 K for 10 min.
Fig. 2: HRTEM characterization of samples recovered from 30 GPa and 1,200–1,600 K.
Fig. 3: Identification of p-D.
Fig. 4: Distinguishing p-D from a-D.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Code availability

The software used for data analysis is available from H.S. upon request.

References

  1. Zallen, R. The Physics of Amorphous Solids (Wiley, 1983).

  2. Zachariasen, W. H. The atomic arrangement in glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 3841–3851 (1932).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elliott, S. R. A continuous random network approach to the structure of vitreous boron trioxide. Philos. Mag. B 37, 435–446 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elliott, S. R. Medium-range structural order in covalent amorphous solids. Nature 354, 445–452 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheng, H. W., Luo, W. K., Alamgir, F. M., Bai, J. M. & Ma, E. Atomic packing and short-to-medium-range order in metallic glasses. Nature 439, 419–425 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miracle, D. B. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nat. Mater. 3, 697–702 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirata, A. et al. Direct observation of local atomic order in a metallic glass. Nat. Mater. 10, 28–33 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirai, H., Kondo, K., Yoshizawa, N. & Shiraishi, M. Amorphous diamond from C60 fullerene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1797–1799 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeng, Z. et al. Synthesis of quenchable amorphous diamond. Nat. Commun. 8, 322 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Y. et al. Amorphous diamond: a high-pressure superhard carbon allotrope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 175504 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Treacy, M. M. J. & Borisenko, K. B. The local structure of amorphous silicon. Science 335, 950–953 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leocmach, M. & Tanaka, H. Roles of icosahedral and crystal-like order in the hard spheres glass transition. Nat. Commun. 3 (2012).

  13. Gibson, J. M., Treacy, M. M. J., Sun, T. & Zaluzec, N. J. Substantial crystalline topology in amorphous silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010).

  14. Oganov, A. R., Hemley, R. J., Hazen, R. M. & Jones, A. P. Structure, bonding, and mineralogy of carbon at extreme conditions. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 75, 47–77 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Georgakilas, V., Perman, J. A., Tucek, J. & Zboril, R. Broad family of carbon nanoallotropes: classification, chemistry, and applications of fullerenes, carbon dots, nanotubes, graphene, nanodiamonds, and combined superstructures. Chem. Rev. 115, 4744–4822 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Németh, P. et al. Complex nanostructures in diamond. Nat. Mater. 19, 1126–1131 (2020).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarac, B. et al. Origin of large plasticity and multiscale effects in iron-based metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 9 (2018).

  18. Hwang, J. et al. Nanoscale structure and structural relaxation in Zr50Cu45Al5 bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012).

  19. Voyles, P. M. et al. Structure and physical properties of paracrystalline atomistic models of amorphous silicon. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4437–4451 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson, J. Diamond-like amorphous carbon. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 37, 129–281 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishii, T., Liu, Z. & Katsura, T. A breakthrough in pressure generation by a Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus with tungsten carbide anvils. Engineering 5, 434–440 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Iwasa, Y. et al. New phases of C60 synthesized at high pressure. Science 264, 1570–1572 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Blank, V. D. et al. Phase transformations in solid C60 at high-pressure-high-temperature treatment and the structure of 3D polymerized fullerites. Phys. Lett. A 220, 149–157 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, S. et al. Discovery of carbon-based strongest and hardest amorphous material. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14819 (2020).

  25. Yamanaka, S. et al. Electron conductive three-dimensional polymer of cuboidal C60. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076602 (2006).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sundqvist, B. Carbon under pressure. Phys. Rep. 909, 1–73 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferrari, A. C. & Robertson, J. Raman spectroscopy of amorphous, nanostructured, diamond–like carbon, and nanodiamond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 362, 2477–2512 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Daniels, H., Brydson, R., Rand, B. & Brown, A. Investigating carbonization and graphitization using electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) in the transmission electron microscope (TEM). Philos. Mag. 87, 4073–4092 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, L. J. et al. Structural evolution in amorphous silicon and germanium thin films. Microsc. Microanal. 8, 268–273 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Q. et al. The atomic-scale mechanism for the enhanced glass-forming-ability of a Cu-Zr based bulk metallic glass with minor element additions. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014).

  31. Tang, H. et al. Revealing the formation mechanism of ultrahard nanotwinned diamond from onion carbon. Carbon 129, 159–167 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu, S.-c., Yan, X.-z., Liu, J., Oganov, A. R. & Zhu, Q. A revisited mechanism of the graphite-to-diamond transition at high temperature. Matter 3, 864–878 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marchi, M. & Ballone, P. Adiabatic bias molecular dynamics: a method to navigate the conformational space of complex molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3697–3702 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, L. L. Molecular Thermodynamics of Electrolyte Solutions (World Scientific, 2008).

  36. Sheng, H. W. et al. Polyamorphism in a metallic glass. Nat. Mater. 6, 192–197 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Faken, D. & Jónsson, H. Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2, 279–286 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lechner, W. & Dellago, C. Accurate determination of crystal structures based on averaged local bond order parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 114707 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Irifune, T., Kurio, A., Sakamoto, S., Inoue, T. & Sumiya, H. Ultrahard polycrystalline diamond from graphite. Nature 421, 599–600 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dubrovinskaia, N., Dubrovinsky, L., Langenhorst, F., Jacobsen, S. & Liebske, C. Nanocrystalline diamond synthesized from C60. Diam. Relat. Mater. 14, 16–22 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sumiya, H. & Irifune, T. Hardness and deformation microstructures of nano-polycrystalline diamonds synthesized from various carbons under high pressure and high temperature. J. Mater. Res. 22, 2345–2351 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, Q. et al. Nanotwinned diamond with unprecedented hardness and stability. Nature 510, 250–253 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang, H. et al. Synthesis of nano-polycrystalline diamond in proximity to industrial conditions. Carbon 108, 1–6 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hujo, W., Shadrack Jabes, B., Rana, V. K., Chakravarty, C. & Molinero, V. The rise and fall of anomalies in tetrahedral liquids. J. Stat. Phys. 145, 293–312 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Merlen, A. et al. High pressure–high temperature synthesis of diamond from single-wall pristine and iodine doped carbon nanotube bundles. Carbon 47, 1643–1651 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Teter, D. M. Computational alchemy: the search for new superhard materials. MRS Bull. 23, 22–27 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bewilogua, K. & Hofmann, D. History of diamond-like carbon films — from first experiments to worldwide applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 242, 214–225 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Osswald, S., Yushin, G., Mochalin, V., Kucheyev, S. O. & Gogotsi, Y. Control of sp2/sp3 carbon ratio and surface chemistry of nanodiamond powders by selective oxidation in air. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 11635–11642 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pu, J.-C., Wang, S.-F. & Sung, J. C. High-temperature oxidation behaviors of CVD diamond films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 668–673 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ishii, T. et al. Generation of pressures over 40 GPa using Kawai-type multi-anvil press with tungsten carbide anvils. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 024501 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kubo, A. & Akaogi, M. Post-garnet transitions in the system Mg4Si4O12-Mg3Al2Si3O12 up to 28 GPa: phase relations of garnet, ilmenite and perovskite. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 121, 85–102 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Oliver, W. C. & Pharr, G. M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564–1583 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wooten, F., Winer, K. & Weaire, D. Computer generation of structural models of amorphous Si and Ge. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1392–1395 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Keating, P. N. Effect of invariance requirements on the elastic strain energy of crystals with application to the diamond structure. Phys. Rev. 145, 637–645 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mishin, Y., Mehl, M. J. & Papaconstantopoulos, D. A. Phase stability in the Fe–Ni system: investigation by first-principles calculations and atomistic simulations. Acta Mater. 53, 4029–4041 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Brommer, P. & Gähler, F. Potfit: effective potentials from ab initio data. Model. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 15, 295–304 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cheng, Y. Q., Ma, E. & Sheng, H. W. Atomic level structure in multicomponent bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 245501 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12562–12566 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Maragliano, L. & Vanden-Eijnden, E. A temperature accelerated method for sampling free energy and determining reaction pathways in rare events simulations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 426, 168–175 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Colón-Ramos, D. A., La Riviere, P., Shroff, H. & Oldenbourg, R. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations. Nat. Methods 16, 670–673 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Finney, J. L. Random packings and the structure of simple liquids. I. The geometry of random close packing. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 319, 479–493 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28, 784–805 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Stukowski, A. Structure identification methods for atomistic simulations of crystalline materials. Model. Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 20, 045021 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Baxter, R. J. Method of solution of the Percus-Yevick, hypernetted-chain, or similar equations. Phys. Rev. 154, 170–174 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Dixon, M. & Hutchinson, P. A method for the extrapolation of pair distribution functions. Mol. Phys. 33, 1663–1670 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Lobato, I., van Aert, S. & Verbeeck, J. Progress and new advances in simulating electron microscopy datasets using MULTEM. Ultramicroscopy 168, 17–27 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Serebryanaya, N., Blank, V., Ivdenko, V. & Chernozatonskii, L. Pressure-induced superhard phase of C60. Solid State Commun. 118, 183–187 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kumar, R. S. et al. X-ray Raman scattering studies on C60 fullerenes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes under pressure. Diam. Relat. Mater. 16, 1250–1253 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Solozhenko, V. L., Kurakevych, O. O., Andrault, D., Le Godec, Y. & Mezouar, M. Ultimate metastable solubility of boron in diamond: synthesis of superhard diamondlike BC5. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 015506 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Solozhenko, V. L., Dub, S. N. & Novikov, N. V. Mechanical properties of cubic BC2N, a new superhard phase. Diam. Relat. Mater. 10, 2228–2231 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Pan, Z., Sun, H., Zhang, Y. & Chen, C. Harder than diamond: superior indentation strength of wurtzite BN and lonsdaleite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055503 (2009).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Blase, X., Gillet, P., Miguel, A. S. & Mélinon, P. Exceptional ideal strength of carbon clathrates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004).

  75. Li, B., Sun, H. & Chen, C. Extreme mechanics of probing the ultimate strength of nanotwinned diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016).

  76. Chang, Y. Y., Jacobsen, S. D., Kimura, M., Irifune, T. & Ohno, I. Elastic properties of transparent nano-polycrystalline diamond measured by GHz-ultrasonic interferometry and resonant sphere methods. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 228, 47–55 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H.K. Mao for insightful discussions. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 12075215 and 61471307), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 20720200075) and the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (proposal no. 787527). The work at George Mason University was supported by the NSF under grant no. DMR-1611064.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for High Pressure Science and Technology Advanced Research, Beijing, China

    Hu Tang, Xiaohong Yuan, Fuyang Liu, Tao Liang, Zhidan Zeng, Takayuki Ishii & Huiyang Gou

  2. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    Yong Cheng & Ming-Sheng Wang

  3. Bayerisches Geoinstitut, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

    Hongzhan Fei, Takayuki Ishii & Tomoo Katsura

  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Howard Sheng

  5. College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China

    Huiyang Gou

Authors
  1. Hu Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaohong Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongzhan Fei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fuyang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tao Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhidan Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takayuki Ishii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ming-Sheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tomoo Katsura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Howard Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Huiyang Gou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.G. and H.S. proposed and supervised the project; H.T., H.F., T.I. and T.K. synthesized the samples; H.T., X.Y., Y.C., F.L. and M.-S.W. performed the structure characterizations; H.T., X.Y., T. L. and Z.Z. measured the properties; H.S. performed the theoretical calculations; H.T., H.S. and H.G. analysed data and wrote the manuscript with the contributions of all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Howard Sheng or Huiyang Gou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Artem Oganov, Alfonso San Miguel, Yogesh Vohra and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 XRD patterns, Raman spectra, fluorescence spectra, and EELS in the low-loss region of the recovered samples.

a, XRD patterns of samples synthesized from different precursors: C60 (top), type-1 glassy carbon (middle), and carbon onion (bottom) at 30 GPa and 1400-1800 K, respectively. At 1800 K, the appearance of weak Bragg diffraction peaks indicates nano-crystallization in the non-crystalline diamond formed from C60. At 1600 K, fully sp3-bonded p-D was identified. By contrast, in cases of using type-1 glassy carbon and carbon onion as the starting material, crystallization precedes the complete conversion of sp2 to sp3 carbon at 30 GPa and 1400-1600 K, preempting the formation of fully sp3-bonded paracrystalline diamond. The experiments demonstrate the importance of the structure of the starting material in the formation pathway of p-D. b, Visible Raman (532 nm) spectrum of the sample recovered at 30 GPa and 1400 K, with background removed. The broadened Raman peak can be fit with a D peak at 1378 cm−1 and a G peak at 1556 cm−1. The peak intensity ratio of ID/IG is 0.66 and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the G peak is 175 cm−1. Similar to our work, the presence of sp2 bonds results in a wide Raman peak between 1400 cm−1 and 1700 cm−1 in the visible Raman spectra of diamond-like carbon (DLC) films27. c, Ultraviolet (UV) Raman spectra of the samples recovered from 1400 and 1500 K, respectively. The strong peak at 1110 cm−1 in the UV Raman spectrum of the sample recovered at 30 GPa and 1400 K is attributed to the T peak caused by sp3 bonds27. Fitting the Raman profile yields a peak intensity ratio of IT/IG 0.91, which is higher than that of DLC films with 88% sp3 bonds, indicating a higher concentration of sp3 bonds in the sample27. On the other hand, for the sample recovered from 1500 K, no obvious peaks are discernible in the UV Raman spectrum, indicating the absence of sp2 bonds in the as-synthesized disordered carbon8. d, Fluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength of 532 nm) of the sample from 1600 K and type Ia diamond. A main fluorescence peak centered around 702 nm suggests the high background in the Raman spectra is due to a fluorescence effect. e, EELS in the low-loss region of diamond crystal, single-crystal graphite, and samples synthesized from C60 under 30 GPa and 1400-1500 K. Based on plasmon peak energy derived from low-loss EELS28, the densities of the recovered samples at 1400-1600 K were calculated to be 3.11, 3.20, and 3.25 g/cm3, respectively. Due to the presence of ~5.2% sp2 carbon, the sample recovered from 1400 K has a lower density of 3.11 g/cm3.

Extended Data Fig. 2 HRTEM images of samples recovered at 30 GPa and different temperatures.

a–c, Typical HRTEM images of samples synthesized at 30 GPa and 1500, 1600, and 1800 K, respectively. a–c and h–j, The inverse FFT images and FFT patterns corresponding to the areas marked by the white boxes (7.0 × 7.0 nm2) in (a), (b), and (c), respectively. The cyan and yellow circles in (e, f) indicate cubic- and hexagonal-like MRO clusters, respectively. In subfigure g, the lattice fringes marked with cyan and yellow solid lines indicate that nanosized cubic and hexagonal diamond crystallites are precipitated from the non-crystalline matrix at 1800 K.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Structure factor S(Q), structural models, and simulated HRTEM images of simulated a-D, p-D with different fractions of paracrystallites, and NPD with different grain sizes.

a, S(Q) of simulated a-D and p-D with different fractions of paracrystallites. With increasing ϕ, the intensity of the first peak increases, and the position of the peak shifts to high-Q, which is consistent with the experimental observation that at higher annealing temperatures, the intensity of the first peak increases and the position moves to the right (from 2.89Å−1 at 1200 K to 2.95 Å−1 at 1600 K, Fig. 3b in the main text). b, S(Q) of simulated NPDs with different grain sizes, juxtaposed with that of the 1800 K sample from our experiment. For the simulated NPD samples, the peak intensity decreases and the peak width broadens as the grain size is refined. Bragg peaks are clearly discernable for the samples with a grain size of 1.2 nm. Experimentally, the protruding diffraction peaks in the 1800 K sample corresponds exactly to the characteristic Bragg peaks of NPD, indicative of crystallization. c, In ultrafine NPD, the less-distorted “core” regions of the nanocrystals (blue spheres) are clearly seen. For NPD with d = 1.56 nm, ϕ is estimated to be 94%, meaning 6% atoms are located at the interfaces and cannot be properly assigned to any of the crystalline grains.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Short-range ordering of a-D, a-Si, p-D, and NPD.

a, Distributions of tetrahedrality qt for a-D and a-Si, both of which were obtained from the WWW bond-switching approach and further relaxed with ab initio MD. The tetrahedral order parameter qt is defined as \({q}_{t}=1-\frac{3}{8}{\sum }_{i=1}^{3}{\sum }_{j=i+1}^{4}{(\cos {\theta }_{ij}+1/3)}^{2}\), where θij is the angle formed by two vectors pointing from the center silicon to two of its neighboring silicon atoms. The summation runs over all the combinations of the four nearest neighbors. The narrow distribution of a-D clearly indicates that a-D has a strong tetrahedral SRO than a-Si. b, Bond-angle distribution within the first atomic shell for a-D and a-Si. Compared with a-Si, a-D has a narrower bond-angle distribution. c, Distributions of the second-nearest-neighbour order parameter s of a-D and a-Si. The order parameter s measures the similarity of the local atomic environment (16 atoms) of a central atom with respect to perfect CD or HD lattice arrangements. The higher the s value, the less distortion of the local cluster. Compared with a-Si, the distribution function of s for a-D shifts to high s values with a centroid of 0.42, suggesting much enhanced SRO within the first two atomic shells in a-D. The high similarity of the local atomic environments between a-D and crystalline diamond stems from the strong directional sp3 bonding of carbon, as evidenced from the narrower bond-angle distribution of a-D in comparison to that of a-Si. d, Distributions s of a-D, p-D, and NPD with a grain size of 1.92 nm. The inset atomic clusters illustrate the cluster configurations (red spheres) corresponding to their degree of similarity with the perfect CD lattice arrangement (green spheres). Paracrystalline diamond has a medium s value (0.51) between that of a-D and NPD, revealing crystalline ordering in p-D. It is worth noting that, for NPD with d = 1.92 nm, the distribution spike at s = 0.96 corresponds to interior atoms in nano-grains that are less distorted. Such atoms are absent in paracrystalline diamond, marking the distinction between p-D and NPD.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Two atomic-shell structures (side and top views) of CD and HD (16 nearest neighbors) atomic packing.

The 12 second nearest neighbors in CD and HD are arranged in the FCC and HCP packing modes, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Structural evolution of C60 under room-temperature compression.

a, Structure model (Only one layer is shown) of C60 under 30 GPa and room temperature (300 K), obtained by classic and ab initio MD. Under high pressure (30 GPa), the inter-molecule distance reduces to 0.86 or 0.87 nm from 1.0 nm. During compression to 30 GPa at room temperature, the buckyballs are deformed and inter-buckyball bonding occurs by formation of four-fold (sp3) bonds (15%). In this and the following figures, the atoms with sp3 bonding are colored in blue. The fraction of sp3 atoms was approximated by the number of 4-fold coordinated atoms within a cut off distance (in this work, rcut = 1.85 Å). We shall point out that, the sp3 fraction calculated this way is slightly underestimated in comparison to that calculated quantum-mechanically, e.g., with the maximally localized Wannier function (MLWF). b, In situ Raman spectra of C60 under compression (up to ~32 GPa) without pressure transmitting medium, with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm. With increasing pressure, the Raman peaks of the Ag mode corresponding to the breathing of totally symmetric vibrations and the Hg mode are gradually broadened with decreased intensity, suggesting a gradual decline of the symmetric environment of pristine C60, associated with the polymerization of buckyballs69 and the formation of sp3 bonds70, consistent with our theoretical results.

Extended Data Fig. 7 MD simulation of fcc-C60 heated to different temperatures at 30 GPa.

a, Classic MD simulation of fcc-C60, heating rate: 1010 K/s. The fraction of sp3 bonds increase with increasing temperature. There is a percolation transition of sp3 bonds at 500-800 K. Such a percolation transition corresponds to the polymerization of C60 molecules. It should be pointed out that the fractions of sp3 bonding were determined based on the criterion of 4-fold bonding within 1.85 Å, which may slightly underestimate the real sp3 fraction of the sample by a few percent. b, Ab initio MD simulation of fcc-C60 (720 atoms), heating rate: 2 × 1014 K/s. Similar to classic MD simulation, the fraction of sp3 bonds increases with increasing temperature in ab initio MD. The simulation results validate what was observed in classical MD. Note the persistence of parallel sp3 bonds at 900 K and 1200 K.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Enthalpy and volume as a function of temperature during the heating treatment of C60 at 30 GPa.

The decrease of enthalpy with increasing temperature (500–1250 K) indicates the main sp2-sp3 transition (25% to 70% as shown in Extended Data Fig. 7a) occurs between 500 K and 1250 K, accompanied by the densification of the material due to the formation of sp3 bonding. The uprise of the enthalpy at temperatures below 500 K and above 1250 K is mainly due to the thermal effect.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Hidden orientational ordering of sp3 bonds in compressed C60.

Top: Structure model of a-D obtained from C60 after 30 GPa and 1600 K without long-time isothermal annealing (Extended Data Fig. 7a). Middle: 3D bond-orientation distribution function projected onto the unit sphere surface. Bottom: Two-dimensional stereographic projection of the bond-orientation function showing the pole figure of preferred bond orientations. The lines serve as a guide to the eye. Heterogeneous intensity distributions suggest that the sp3 bonds in the as-obtained a-D have preferred orientations, inherited from the initial parallel sp3 bonds in the early stage of polymerization.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Classic MD simulation of the structural evolution of a-D during isothermal annealing at 1600 K and 30 GPa, 6400 atoms, up to 15 ns.

Only the core atoms of the paracrystallites are shown. The paracrystallites marked by turquoise and gold have CD and HD-like structures, respectively. The fraction of paracrystallites increases with the annealing time (a-o, at a time interval of 1 ns per image). The last image (p) shows a 3D configuration paracrystalline diamond with ϕ = 20% obtained from brute-force classical MD. To further increase the volume fraction of p-D, we resorted to adiabatic-bias molecular dynamics and the final results are given in Fig. 3 of the main text. See Supplementary Video for the fluctuations of the paracrystallites.

Extended Data Fig. 11 Mechanical properties of recovered samples.

a, Vickers hardness Hv and fracture toughness KIC of the samples recovered at 30 GPa and different temperatures, measured at 4.9 and 9.8 N, respectively. Inset: an optical image of the indentation of p-D recovered from 1600 K. b, Side-by-side comparison of the loading/unloading displacement curves of p-D recovered from 1600 K and natural diamond in the nanoindentation experiment. Inset: A table of nanoindentation hardness HN and elastic modulus E obtained from different test points. c, Overview of shear modulus G versus Vickers hardness Hv for typical superhard ceramics42,46,71,72. The shear modulus G (437.9 ± 4.7 GPa) and bulk modulus K (363.3 ± 3.9 GPa) was derived through formulas G = E/[2(1 + μ)] and K = E/[3(1-2μ)], where the elastic modulus E (937.2 ± 10.1 GPa) was experimentally measured (shown in b) and μ is the Poisson’s ratio (0.07) of diamond. Error bars in a and c indicate the standard deviations. d, Summary for the calculated and experimental hardness of typical sp3 carbons of p-D, diamond42,46, hexagonal diamond73, carbon clathrates74, NPD39,41 and nanotwinned diamond (NTD)42,75. e, Comparison of theoretical Young’s modulus and bulk modulus of p-D and diamond76. For the ab initio calculations, we used DFT-based ab initio modeling stated in the Methods section but with a smaller-sized p-D sample (240 atoms) derived from classical MD.

Extended Data Fig. 12 Thermostability of p-D.

a, Both thermogravimetry (TG) and DSC curves of p-D were measured in air at a heating rate of 5 K/min. b, Thermostability of p-D, compared with other superhard carbons47,48,49. Superhard (50-80 GPa) DLC films have a wide range of onset oxidation temperature (673–873 K), depending on the fraction of sp3 bonds. The thermostability of p-D is superior to that of NPD (d = ~13 nm)43.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Supplementary Video 1

Nucleation and growth of diamond paracrystallites from MD simulation. Adiabatic-bias MD simulation showing the nucleation process of p-D. The morphologies of the p-D nuclei are dynamically changing. The critical nucleus size (20–30 atoms) is found to be ~3.0 Å, suggesting that the paracrystallites belong to supercritical nuclei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, H., Yuan, X., Cheng, Y. et al. Synthesis of paracrystalline diamond. Nature 599, 605–610 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04122-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04122-w

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing