Abstract
Magnetars are neutron stars with extremely strong magnetic fields (1013 to 1015 gauss)1,2, which episodically emit X-ray bursts approximately 100 milliseconds long and with energies of 1040 to 1041 erg. Occasionally, they also produce extremely bright and energetic giant flares, which begin with a short (roughly 0.2 seconds), intense flash, followed by fainter, longer-lasting emission that is modulated by the spin period of the magnetar3,4 (typically 2 to 12 seconds). Over the past 40 years, only three such flares have been observed in our local group of galaxies3,4,5,6, and in all cases the extreme intensity of the flares caused the detectors to saturate. It has been proposed that extragalactic giant flares are probably a subset7,8,9,10,11 of short γ-ray bursts, given that the sensitivity of current instrumentation prevents us from detecting the pulsating tail, whereas the initial bright flash is readily observable out to distances of around 10 to 20 million parsecs. Here we report X-ray and γ-ray observations of the γ-ray burst GRB 200415A, which has a rapid onset, very fast time variability, flat spectra and substantial sub-millisecond spectral evolution. These attributes match well with those expected for a giant flare from an extragalactic magnetar12, given that GRB 200415A is directionally associated13 with the galaxy NGC 253 (roughly 3.5 million parsecs away). The detection of three-megaelectronvolt photons provides evidence for the relativistic motion of the emitting plasma. Radiation from such rapidly moving gas around a rotating magnetar may have generated the rapid spectral evolution that we observe.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
γ-ray data from CGRO–BATSE, Swift–BAT and Fermi–GBM are available in public repositories on NASA’s High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC; https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/w3browse/all/batsegrb.html, https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/swift/swiftgrb.html and https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/fermi/fermigbrst.html, respectively); catalogues of these data are provided as citations. The raw VLA data are publicly available (https://archive.nrao.edu). The calibrated VLA data and images are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Code availability
Standard software packages, such as rmfit for GBM and XSPEC for other instruments, are available online (https://fermi.gsfc.nasa.gov/ssc/data/analysis/rmfit/ and https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/software.html, respectively). The codes used to determine the significance of the BGO photons, to construct the BAT TTE detector response matrices and to determine the rise time are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The VLA data were analysed using publicly available software (CASA). The procedure for detecting and quantifying the QPOs is publicly available in Stingray (https://stingray.readthedocs.io/en/latest/). The algorithm used to determine the pulse pile-up of the GBM data is available in ref. 35. The SwiMM code is not publicly available; however, response functions can be used to reproduce our spectral results; these are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Thompson, C. & Duncan, R. C. The soft gamma repeaters as very strongly magnetized neutron stars – I. Radiative mechanism for outbursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 275, 255–300 (1995).
Kouveliotou, C. et al. An X-ray pulsar with a superstrong magnetic field in the soft γ-ray repeater SGR1806−20. Nature 393, 235–237 (1998).
Hurley, K. et al. A giant periodic flare from the soft γ-ray repeater SGR1900+14. Nature 397, 41–43 (1999).
Palmer, D. M. et al. A giant γ-ray flare from the magnetar SGR 1806−20. Nature 434, 1107–1109 (2005).
Fenimore, E. E., Klebesadel, R. W. & Laros, J. G. The 1979 March 5 gamma-ray transient: was it a classic gamma-ray burst? Astrophys. J. 460, 964–975 (1996).
Feroci, M. et al. A giant outburst from SGR 1900+14 observed with the BeppoSAX gamma-ray burst monitor. Astrophys. J. 515, L9–L12 (1999).
Duncan, R. C. Gamma-ray bursts from extragalactic magnetar flares. AIP Conf. Ser. 586, 495–500 (2001).
Tanvir, N. R., Chapman, R., Levan, A. J. & Priddey, R. S. An origin in the local Universe for some short γ-ray bursts. Nature 438, 991–993 (2005).
Ofek, E. O. et al. The short-hard GRB 051103: observations and implications for its nature. Astrophys. J. 652, 507–511 (2006).
Mazets, E. P. et al. A giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the Andromeda galaxy (M31). Astrophys. J. 680, 545–549 (2008).
Ofek, E. O. et al. GRB 070201: a possible soft gamma-ray repeater in M31. Astrophys. J. 681, 1464–1469 (2008).
Yang, J. et al. GRB 200415A: a short gamma-ray burst from a magnetar giant flare? Astrophys. J. 899, 106 (2020).
Svinkin, D. et al. A bright γ-ray flare interpreted as a giant magnetar flare in NGC 253. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03076-9 (2021).
Bissaldi, E. et al. GRB 200415A: Fermi GBM observation. GRB Coordinates Network 27587 (2020).
The Fermi-LAT Collaboration. High-energy emission from a magnetar giant flare in the sculptor galaxy. Nat. Astron. (in the press).
Tohuvavohu, A. et al. Gamma-ray Urgent Archiver for Novel Opportunities (GUANO): Swift/BAT event data dumps on demand to enable sensitive sub-threshold GRB searches. Astrophys. J. 900, 35 (2020).
Rekola, R. et al. Distance to NGC 253 based on the planetary nebula luminosity function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 361, 330–336 (2005).
Kouveliotou, C. et al. Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 413, L101–L104 (1993).
Perley, R. A., Chandler, C. J., Butler, B. J. & Wrobel, J. M. The Expanded Very Large Array: a new telescope for new science. Astrophys. J. 739, L1 (2011).
Ofek, E. O. et al. Soft gamma-ray repeaters in nearby galaxies: rate, luminosity function, and fraction among short gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 659, 339–346 (2007).
Hurley, K. et al. The short gamma-ray burst - SGR giant flare connection. Adv. Space Res. 47, 1337–1340 (2011).
von Kienlin, A. et al. The fourth fermi-GBM gamma-ray burst catalog: a decade of data. Astrophys. J. 893, 46 (2020).
Kaneko, Y. et al. The complete spectral catalog of bright BATSE gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 166, 298–340 (2006).
Frederiks, D. et al. GRB 051103 and GRB 070201 as giant flares from SGRs in nearby galaxies. AIP Conf. Proc. 1000, 271–275 (2008).
Bhat, P. N. et al. Evidence for sub-millisecond structure in a γ-ray burst. Nature 359, 217–218 (1992).
MacLachlan, G. A. et al. Minimum variability time-scales of long and short GRBs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 857–865 (2013).
Rybicki, G. B. & Lightman, A. P. Radiative Processes in Astrophysics Ch. 1 (Wiley, 1979).
Boggs, S. E. et al. The giant flare of 2004 December 27 from SGR 1806–20. Astrophys. J. 661, 458–467 (2007).
Mészáros, P. & Rees, M. J. Steep slopes and preferred breaks in gamma-ray burst spectra: the role of photospheres and comptonization. Astrophys. J. 530, 292–298 (2000).
Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. Photon splitting and pair creation in highly magnetized pulsars. Astrophys. J. 547, 929–948 (2001).
Lin, L. et al. Broadband spectral investigations of SGR J1550–5418 bursts. Astrophys. J. 756, 54 (2012).
Preece, R. D. et al. The synchrotron shock model confronts a “line of death” in the BATSE gamma-ray burst data. Astrophys. J. 506, L23–L26 (1998).
Meegan, C. et al. The Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor. Astrophys. J. 702, 791–804 (2009).
von Kienlin, A. et al. Detection of spectral evolution in the bursts emitted during the 2008–2009 active episode of SGR J1550−5418. Astrophys. J. 755, 150 (2012).
Chaplin, V., Bhat, N., Briggs, M. S. & Connaughton, V. Analytical modeling of pulse-pilup distortion using the true pulse shape, with applications to Fermi GBM. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 717, 21–36 (2013).
Bhat, P. N. et al. Fermi gamma-ray burst monitor detector performance at very high counting rates. Exp. Astron. 38, 331–357 (2014).
The Fermi-GBM Team. GRB 200415A: Fermi GBM final real-time localization. GRB Coordinates Network 27579 (2020).
Kunzweiler, F., Biltzinger, B., Berlato, F., Burgess, J. & Greiner, J. GRB 200415A: BALROG localization (Fermi trigger 608633290 / GRB 200415367). GRB Coordinates Network 27580 (2020).
Goldstein, A. et al. Evaluation of automated Fermi-GBM localizations of gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 895, 40 (2020).
Berlato, F., Greiner, J. & Burgess, J. M. Improved Fermi-GBM GRB localizations using BALROG. Astrophys. J. 873, 60 (2019).
Gruber, D. et al. The Fermi-GBM gamma-ray burst spectral catalog: four years of data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 211, 12 (2014).
Band, D. et al. BATSE observations of gamma-ray burst spectra. I. Spectral diversity. Astrophys. J. 413, 281–292 (1993).
Goldstein, A. et al. Updates to the Fermi-GBM targeted sub-threshold search in preparation for the third observing run of LIGO/Virgo. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12597 (2019).
Barthelmy, S., Barber, L. & Cummings, J. A. The Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) on the SWIFT Midex Mission. Space Sci. Rev. 120, 143–164 (2005).
Sato, G. Gamma-ray and X-ray Study of Relativistic Jets in Gamma-ray Burst Sources Detected with Swift. PhD thesis, Univ. Tokyo (2007).
Arnaud, K. XSPEC: the first ten years. ASP Conf. Ser. 101, 17–20 (1996).
Norris, J. P. et al. Attributes of pulses in long bright gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 459, 393–412 (1996).
Gregory, P. Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences Ch. 14, 384–385 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Krolik, J. H. & Pier, E. A. Relativistic motion in gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 373, 277–284 (1991).
Baring, M. G. & Harding, A. K. The escape of high-energy photons from gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 491, 663–686 (1997).
Granot, J., Cohen-Tanugi, J. & Silva, E. C. E. Opacity buildup in impulsive relativistic sources. Astrophys. J. 677, 92–126 (2008).
Nakar, E., Piran, T. & Sari, R. Pure and loaded fireballs in soft gamma-ray repeater giant flares. Astrophys. J. 635, 516–521 (2005).
Blandford, R. D. & McKee, C. F. Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves. Phys. Fluids 19, 1130–1138 (1976).
Paczyński, B. GB 790305 as a very strongly magnetized neutron star. Acta Astron. 42, 145–153 (1992).
Barat, C. et al. Fine time structure in the 1979 March 5 gamma ray burst. Astron. Astrophys. 126, 400–402 (1983).
Israel, G. L. et al. The discovery of rapid X-ray oscillations in the tail of the SGR 1806-20 hyperflare. Astrophys. J. 628, L53–L56 (2005).
Strohmayer, T. E. & Watts, A. L. Discovery of fast X-Ray oscillations during the 1998 giant flare from SGR 1900+14. Astrophys. J. 632, L111–L114 (2005).
Watts, A. L. & Strohmayer, T. E. Detection with RHESSI of high-frequency X-ray oscillations in the tail of the 2004 hyperflare from SGR 1806-20. Astrophys. J. 637, L117–L120 (2006).
Huppenkothen, D. et al. Quasi-periodic oscillations and broadband variability in short magnetar bursts. Astrophys. J. 768, 87 (2013).
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: the MCMC hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 125, 306–312 (2013).
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W. & Golap, K. CASA architecture and applications. ASP Conf. Ser. 376, 127–130 (2007).
Acknowledgements
The Fermi GBM Collaboration acknowledges the support of NASA in the United States under grant NNM11AA01A and of DRL in Germany. P.V. acknowledges support from NASA grant 80NSSC19K0595. A.T. and J.J.D. thank T. Sakamoto for access to the Swift mass model. We thank the National Radio Astronomy Observatory, a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under a cooperative agreement by Associated Universities. D.H. acknowledges support from the DIRAC Institute in the Department of Astronomy at the University of Washington. The DIRAC Institute is supported through gifts from the Charles and Lisa Simonyi Fund for Arts and Sciences and the Washington Research Foundation. J.J.D. acknowledges that this material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants PHY-1708146 and PHY-1806854 and by the Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos of Pennsylvania State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
O.J.R. led the research effort. O.J.R., P.V., M.G.B., M.S.B., C.K., E.G., A.T., J.D.L. and J.A.K. wrote the manuscript. O.J.R., P.V., E.Bi., D.H., M.S.B., P.N.B., S.I.C., J.J.D., J.A.K., D.K., A.T., G.Y., S.G. and R.H. contributed to the data analysis. E.Bi. completed the first analysis of the event as she was the Burst Advocate during the trigger time of GRB 200415A (GCN 27587). M.G.B. and P.V. led the interpretation of results. O.J.R., P.V., E.Bi. and G.Y. contributed to the spectral analysis of the event. P.V. worked on the time variability of GRB 200415A with P.N.B. and D.K. D.K. performed the T90 duration calculation. M.S.B. worked with P.N.B. on the data handling, and addressed the band-width issue that caused the data saturation in the GBM data. P.V. and M.S.B. analysed the highest-energy photon from GBM and did the pulse pile-up analysis. D.H. performed the quasi-periodic-oscillation analysis. J.A.K. and A.T. provided the Swift–BAT event data. J.J.D. and A.T. ran the simulations and created the response files necessary to perform analysis of the Swift–BAT data, which was performed by J.J.D., A.T. and P.V. Abstract contributions came from E.G and O.J.R. A.v.d.H., J.D.L. and S.I.C. contributed to the radio search and write-up, with S.I.C. performing most of the VLA analysis. S.G. provided initial spectral analysis (for example, Ep and ℱ correlations) and redshift estimates using his method for short GRBs. R.H. performed population analysis of GRBs with P.V. Feedback was provided by C.A.W.-H., which helped to steer the paper through the GBM internal review process. E.Bu. helped to put the result in the context of other short GRBs, performed chance likelihood calculations and helped to organize the research effort of this source by other collaborating missions. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 The duration of GRB 200415A.
The T90 (green) and T50 (purple) durations were calculated using the Swift–BAT data in count space. The errors are at the 1σ confidence level.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Spectra and fitted models in three time intervals for GRB 200415A.
The νFν spectra (top) and Comptonized fitting residuals (bottom) are shown for intervals (1) (left), (3) (centre) and (4) (right) of GRB 200415A. The three spectra are devoid of any instrumental effects attributed to bandwidth saturation. The fit parameters are listed in Table 1. These figures show the robustness of the fits to the data (1σ confidence), which are used in the main text and in Fig. 1d, and are a direct result of the unrivalled temporal and spectral quality of the GBM data. Arrows on the error bars are due to the lower or upper limits being unconstrained. The solid blue lines are the best fits to the data.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Energetic photons from GRB 200415A.
The grey histogram represents the counts with energies of 0.2–40 MeV (left axis). Individual TTEs of GBM BGO detector 0 are shown as black circles, superimposed over the grey histogram, with photon energies in MeV (right axis). The blue rectangle indicates energies of 2.5–3.5 MeV in intervals (2) and (3); the red rectangle shows energies of 3.5–10 MeV. We conclude that the highest photon energy unambiguously associated with GRB 200415A is 3 MeV.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roberts, O.J., Veres, P., Baring, M.G. et al. Rapid spectral variability of a giant flare from a magnetar in NGC 253. Nature 589, 207–210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03077-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03077-8
This article is cited by
-
Kilohertz quasiperiodic oscillations in short gamma-ray bursts
Nature (2023)
-
Fast radio bursts at the dawn of the 2020s
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review (2022)
-
Cosmic electromagnetic bomb sheds light on the origins of γ-ray bursts
Nature (2021)
-
A bright γ-ray flare interpreted as a giant magnetar flare in NGC 253
Nature (2021)
-
Very-high-frequency oscillations in the main peak of a magnetar giant flare
Nature (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.