The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
541,
Pages:
421–424
Date published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature20820
Received
Accepted
Published online

Oligomerization of membrane proteins in response to lipid binding has a critical role in many cell-signalling pathways1 but is often difficult to define2 or predict3. Here we report the development of a mass spectrometry platform to determine simultaneously the presence of interfacial lipids and oligomeric stability and to uncover how lipids act as key regulators of membrane-protein association. Evaluation of oligomeric strength for a dataset of 125 α-helical oligomeric membrane proteins reveals an absence of interfacial lipids in the mass spectra of 12 membrane proteins with high oligomeric stability. For the bacterial homologue of the eukaryotic biogenic transporters (LeuT4, one of the proteins with the lowest oligomeric stability), we found a precise cohort of lipids within the dimer interface. Delipidation, mutation of lipid-binding sites or expression in cardiolipin-deficient Escherichia coli abrogated dimer formation. Molecular dynamics simulation revealed that cardiolipin acts as a bidentate ligand, bridging across subunits. Subsequently, we show that for the Vibrio splendidus sugar transporter SemiSWEET5, another protein with low oligomeric stability, cardiolipin shifts the equilibrium from monomer to functional dimer. We hypothesized that lipids are essential for dimerization of the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA from E. coli, which has the lowest oligomeric strength, but not for the substantially more stable homologous Thermus thermophilus protein NapA. We found that lipid binding is obligatory for dimerization of NhaA, whereas NapA has adapted to form an interface that is stable without lipids. Overall, by correlating interfacial strength with the presence of interfacial lipids, we provide a rationale for understanding the role of lipids in both transient and stable interactions within a range of α-helical membrane proteins, including G-protein-coupled receptors.

At a glance

Figures

  1. Plot of buried surface area and number of salt bridges for oligomeric α-helical membrane proteins and native mass spectra.
    Figure 1: Plot of buried surface area and number of salt bridges for oligomeric α-helical membrane proteins and native mass spectra.

    Protein oligomers are represented by circles colour-coded according to the number of salt bridges they form, where maximum number of salt bridge is designated to 100% and 0 is marked as 0% and are grouped by oligomeric state (pentamers+ have an oligomeric state ≥5). A random horizontal jitter has been applied to all points to aid visualization. NhaA and LeuT (outlined in red) are two of the weakest oligomers, having some of the lowest buried surface areas and forming no salt bridges. The 12 proteins for which mass spectra have been recorded are outlined in green. Illustrated are mass spectra of the trimeric ammonia channel AmtB, tetrameric aquaporin AqpZ and pentameric ion channel ELIC. A larger buried surface area than LeuT and NhaA but an absence of salt bridges make SemiSWEET a stronger dimer than LeuT and NhaA but weaker than the other 12 oligomeric proteins.

  2. Schematic of the high-energy MS/MS platform, mass spectra and molecular dynamics simulations of the lipid-bound LeuT dimer.
    Figure 2: Schematic of the high-energy MS/MS platform, mass spectra and molecular dynamics simulations of the lipid-bound LeuT dimer.

    a, Protein–lipid complexes (protein, red/green rods; lipid, yellow) are liberated from detergent micelles (blue) by a high potential difference applied to the cone (inset 1). Quadrupole isolation of the protein–lipid complex separates it from detergent molecules and bulk lipids (inset 2). Collision with neutral gas in the collision cell dissociates the protein–lipid complex (inset 3). The masses of constituent proteins and lipids are measured in the time-of-flight analyser. b, Mass spectrum of LeuT liberated from octylglucoside micelles shows monomers (green) and dimers (green/grey) with a mass 7.4 kDa greater than the amino acid sequence mass. c, MS/MS of 23+ charge state of LeuT reveals monomers with cardiolipin (CDL, purple head-group) and phospholipid (blue head-group) retained. Masses of the bound lipids are marked black (phospholipids) and red (cardiolipin). Inset, molecular dynamics simulation of LeuT in an E. coli lipid bilayer revealing possible binding sites of interfacial cardiolipin. The cardiolipin phosphate groups (orange) interact closely with positively charged residues (K376, H377, R506; blue) at the dimer interface. Interactions are shown (yellow dotted lines) with distances measured in ångströms (red).

  3. Mass spectrum recorded for SemiSWEET and the effect of cardiolipin on the monomer–dimer equilibrium.
    Figure 3: Mass spectrum recorded for SemiSWEET and the effect of cardiolipin on the monomer–dimer equilibrium.

    Mass spectrum of SemiSWEET following incubation with cardiolipin (purple head-groups). Plot of cardiolipin concentration against the percentage of monomer or dimer observed in mass spectra at various cardiolipin concentrations (bars represent n = 5 data points denoted with black dots, error bars denote s.d.).

  4. Comparison of mass spectra of NhaA with NapA and plot of transporter stabilities with assorted G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Figure 4: Comparison of mass spectra of NhaA with NapA and plot of transporter stabilities with assorted G-protein-coupled receptors.

    a, Mass spectrum of NhaA (green/grey spheres) liberated from C8E4 micelles reveals binding of cardiolipin (purple head-groups) and phospholipids (blue head-groups) to the intact NhaA dimers. Molecular dynamics simulation of NhaA (green/black rods) in an E. coli lipid bilayer (inset) reveals interfacial cardiolipin binding (orange/purple spheres). Mass spectrum of dimeric NapA (right), liberated from C8E4 micelles, shows NapA dimers without lipid binding (blue/brown spheres). b, Oligomeric stability scale (purple) annotated with crystal structures of proteins studied here (above) and GPCRs (below). Buried surface area is shown in parentheses and number of salt bridges (SB) is shown for NapA. Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession numbers: 2A65 (LeuT), 4QND (SemiSWEET), 4AU5 (NhaA), 4BWZ (NapA), 4GPO (β1-adrenergic receptor), 4DKL (μ-opioid receptor), 4DJH (κ-opioid receptor).

  5. Mass spectra of LeuT recorded with increasing collision voltages and of a LeuT fusion protein construct.
    Extended Data Fig. 1: Mass spectra of LeuT recorded with increasing collision voltages and of a LeuT fusion protein construct.

    a, Mass spectra of LeuT, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, (green/grey spheres, most abundant charge state highlighted in pale blue), show that the 7.4-kDa lipid adduct (blue/purple head groups) is retained throughout the trap collision energy range (white, blue arrow) of the mass spectrometer. b, Mass spectra of LeuT expressed as a fusion protein with eYFP (LeuT–eYFP yellow circles), liberated from octylglucoside micelles, show that the dimer is similarly associated with a 7.4-kDa adduct.

  6. Mass spectra of LeuT following incubation with delipidating detergents and E. coli polar lipids.
    Extended Data Fig. 2: Mass spectra of LeuT following incubation with delipidating detergents and E. coli polar lipids.

    a, Mass spectrum of LeuT liberated from octylglucoside micelles (green head groups) shows low-abundance delipidated monomers (green spheres, 59.3 kDa) and high-abundance lipid-bound dimers (green/black spheres, 126.0 kDa). b, Mass spectrum of LeuT after incubation with neopentyl glycol (NG, orange head-groups) shows only delipidated monomers. c, Mass spectrum of LeuT in octylglucoside (OG), after incubation with neopentyl glycol, shows only delipidated monomers. d, Mass spectrum recorded after incubation of delipidated LeuT monomers, in octylglucoside, with E. coli polar lipids (blue/purple head-groups) shows delipidated monomers and lipid-bound dimers. e, Mass spectrum recorded after adding dilysocardiolipin (blue head-groups) to delipidated monomeric LeuT in octylglucoside (c) shows no dimerization in the presence of this lipid.

  7. High-energy MS/MS experiment of the 23+ charge state of dimeric LeuT, with the 7.4-kDa adduct, as a function of collision voltage.
    Extended Data Fig. 3: High-energy MS/MS experiment of the 23+ charge state of dimeric LeuT, with the 7.4-kDa adduct, as a function of collision voltage.

    Three satellite peaks represent the lipid-bound states arising through the dissociation of the monomer. The naked monomer is highlighted in blue, while the three satellite peaks are assigned to one phospholipid, one cardiolipin and three phospholipid-bound species (red, green and yellow, respectively). Under higher energy, only the cardiolipin-bound species remains, discounting the mathematical possibility of two phospholipid-bound species. Inset shows the isolated 23+ charge state of the lipid bound dimer. Presence of bound cardiolipin at a higher energy, over that of phospholipid, indicates a higher binding energy of cardiolipin over the latter, potentially owing to greater ionic and hydrophobic interactions.

  8. Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues at the LeuT dimer interface, resulting mass spectra and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Extended Data Fig. 4: Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues at the LeuT dimer interface, resulting mass spectra and molecular dynamics simulations.

    a, Mass spectrum of LeuT F488A/Y489A, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, reveals monomeric LeuT (green spheres). Inset shows the LeuT dimer interface, with key π-stacking interactions (yellow dotted lines, distances labelled in red) and between aromatic residues (purple). When residues F488 and Y489 (orange arrows) are mutated to alanine, the π-stacking interactions are abolished and LeuT cannot dimerize. b, Molecular dynamics simulations of LeuT in an E. coli lipid bilayer reveal possible binding sites of interfacial phospholipids and cardiolipin (upper panel, viewed from cytoplasmic side of membrane). The cardiolipin phosphate groups (orange) interact closely with positively charged residues (K376, H377, R506; blue) at the dimer interface. Phosphoethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) also bind at the dimer interface. c, Mass spectrum of LeuT expressed in a cardiolipin-deficient E. coli strain (BKT22), liberated from octylglucoside micelles, shows monomeric LeuT, implying that cardiolipin is required for LeuT dimerization. d, Mass spectrum of LeuT K376A/H377A, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, shows monomeric LeuT.

  9. CGMD simulations on LeuT and NhaA dimer.
    Extended Data Fig. 5: CGMD simulations on LeuT and NhaA dimer.

    a, Particle densities from five repeats of 1-μs CGMD simulations for cardiolipin around LeuT. The surface densities represent the most occupied positions from the simulations of the phosphate (orange), glycerol (red) and alkyl tails (purple) particles of cardiolipin. The proposed binding sites at the interface are the only places where cardiolipin shows considerable population density. bd, Comparative particle densities of cardiolipin (b), phosphatidylglycerol (c) and phosphoethanolamine (d) at the LeuT dimeric interface, summed over the simulations show no or minimal densities for phosphatidylglycerol and phosphoethanolamine at the cardiolipin-binding site. Together, ad show that the proposed binding sites of cardiolipin at the interface are sites of specific bindings. e, Dimeric structure of LeuT with modelled APT (aminopentanetetrol, aminophospholipids) classes of lipid present in A. aeolicus52. The lipid was drawn in ChemDraw and subsequently modelled by superimposition onto cardiolipin to give the cardiolipin-bound dimeric structure. The favourable van der Waals distances show that it is capable of bridging the dimeric entity through the same sets of residues that were found to be critical towards cardiolipin binding, in an endogenous environment lacking cardiolipins. f, Particle densities from five repeats of 1-μs CGMD simulations for cardiolipin (phosphate group in orange, glycerol in red and alkyl tails in purple) and POPG (in blue) around NhaA dimer interface. As before, the density of cardiolipin is considerably higher than that of phosphatidylglycerol. However, unlike LeuT, here the difference between the density of cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol is lower, suggesting this site has less exclusivity towards cardiolipin than that in LeuT. Indeed, mass spectrometry analysis shows a heterogenous distribution of lipids with dimeric NhaA, with mostly cardiolipin but some amount of bound phospholipids.

  10. Mass spectra of His-tagged and unmodified SemiSWEET and identification of endogenous and exogenous lipid binding.
    Extended Data Fig. 6: Mass spectra of His-tagged and unmodified SemiSWEET and identification of endogenous and exogenous lipid binding.

    a, Mass spectrum of unmodified SemiSWEET, liberated from tetraethyleneglycolmonooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles, reveals SemiSWEET monomers and dimers (black spheres). b, Mass spectrum of deca-His tagged SemiSWEET, liberated from C8E4 micelles, reveals SemiSWEET monomers and dimers (green spheres). c, High energy MS/MS of unmodified SemiSWEET, liberated from dodecylmaltoside (DDM) micelles, allows isolation of the 6+ charge state (black spheres) of the SemiSWEET monomer (black spheres) bound to endogenous lipids. Fragmentation of the lipid-bound species leads to loss of either cardiolipin (1,470 ± 26 Da, purple head-groups), one or two neutral phospholipids (each 756 ± 22 Da, blue head-groups), or a positively charged phospholipid. Trap collision voltages are shown in white inside the blue arrow. d, Mass spectrum of deca-His SemiSWEET, liberated from C8E4 micelles and incubated with phosphatidylglycerol (blue head-groups). phosphatidylglycerol binds to both monomers and dimers (dotted boxes highlight lipid-bound peaks) without substantial preference. e, Mass spectrum recorded after incubation in solution of an equimolar ratio of deca-His tagged and untagged SemiSWEET (green and black spheres, respectively), liberated from tetraethyleneglycolmonooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles. Plot of the percentage abundance of hetero- and homodimers over time (inset), SemiSWEET heterodimers (red trace, peaks highlighted red in mass spectrum) and homodimers (black trace), revealing the solution-phase monomer–dimer equilibrium (PDB accession number: 4QND).

  11. Mass spectrum and high-energy MS/MS of NhaA at a range of collision voltages.
    Extended Data Fig. 7: Mass spectrum and high-energy MS/MS of NhaA at a range of collision voltages.

    a, Mass spectrum of NhaA, liberated from C8E4 micelles, reveals NhaA monomers (green spheres) bound to cardiolipin (purple head-groups) and an ensemble of NhaA dimer species in different lipidation states (highlighted in green). b, MS/MS of the 15+ charge state (green) of the NhaA dimer (green/black spheres) bound to two cardiolipin molecules liberated from C8E4 micelles. Increasing collision voltage applied to the 2× cardiolipin-bound species leads either to loss of 1 cardiolipin to form NhaA dimers bound to 1 cardiolipin (40 V) or to loss of 2 cardiolipin molecules to form delipidated NhaA dimers, with concomitant generation of NhaA monomers (70 V) and further dissociation of NhaA dimers into monomers (120 V). Trap collision voltages are depicted in white, inside the blue arrow.

  12. Sequence and structure alignment of LeuT with other eukaryotic biogenic transporters.
    Extended Data Fig. 8: Sequence and structure alignment of LeuT with other eukaryotic biogenic transporters.

    a, The basic residues of LeuT that are involved in lipid binding (red box) are conserved across the BATs. b, Two views of the superimposed structures of LeuT (PDB accession number: 2A65, black) and SERT (PDB accession number: 5I6Z, light blue) show the differences in the dimer interface. Dimer interface helices are highlighted with arrows and coloured (LeuT, green; SERT, red); basic residues responsible for lipid binding in LeuT are shown in yellow mesh. One of the interface helices in SERT swings away from the interface, negating the possibility of lipid-induced oligomerization, analogous to that proposed for LeuT.

Tables

  1. Summary of the mass spectral analysis of membrane proteins forming strong oligomers
    Extended Data Table 1: Summary of the mass spectral analysis of membrane proteins forming strong oligomers

References

  1. Arkhipov, A. et al. Architecture and membrane interactions of the EGF receptor. Cell 152, 557569 (2013)
  2. Wu, H. et al. Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science 344, 5864 (2014)
  3. Duarte, J. M., Biyani, N., Baskaran, K. & Capitani, G. An analysis of oligomerization interfaces in transmembrane proteins. BMC Struct. Biol. 13, 21 (2013)
  4. Piscitelli, C. L., Krishnamurthy, H. & Gouaux, E. Neurotransmitter/sodium symporter orthologue LeuT has a single high-affinity substrate site. Nature 468, 11291132 (2010)
  5. Xu, Y. et al. Structures of bacterial homologues of SWEET transporters in two distinct conformations. Nature 515, 448452 (2014)
  6. Yeagle, P. L. Non-covalent binding of membrane lipids to membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1838, 15481559 (2014)
  7. Hansen, S. B., Tao, X. & MacKinnon, R. Structural basis of PIP2 activation of the classical inward rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2. Nature 477, 495498 (2011)
  8. Gao, Y., Cao, E., Julius, D. & Cheng, Y. TRPV1 structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action. Nature 534, 347351 (2016)
  9. Whitelegge, J. P. Integral membrane proteins and bilayer proteomics. Anal. Chem. 85, 25582568 (2013)
  10. Savas, J. N., Stein, B. D., Wu, C. C. & Yates, J. R., III. Mass spectrometry accelerates membrane protein analysis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 388396 (2011)
  11. Konijnenberg, A., van Dyck, J. F., Kailing, L. L. & Sobott, F. Extending native mass spectrometry approaches to integral membrane proteins. Biol. Chem. 396, 9911002 (2015)
  12. Laganowsky, A. et al. Membrane proteins bind lipids selectively to modulate their structure and function. Nature 510, 172175 (2014)
  13. Landreh, M., Marty, M. T., Gault, J. & Robinson, C. V. A sliding selectivity scale for lipid binding to membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 39, 5460 (2016)
  14. Levy, E. D., Boeri Erba, E., Robinson, C. V. & Teichmann, S. A. Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes. Nature 453, 12621265 (2008)
  15. Pliotas, C. et al. The role of lipids in mechanosensation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 991998 (2015)
  16. Ilgü, H. et al. Variation of the detergent-binding capacity and phospholipid content of membrane proteins when purified in different detergents. Biophys. J. 106, 16601670 (2014)
  17. Brügger, B. Lipidomics: analysis of the lipid composition of cells and subcellular organelles by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 7998 (2014)
  18. Taki, T. TLC-blot (far-eastern blot) and its application to functional lipidomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 1314, 219241 (2015)
  19. Cox, J. & Mann, M. Quantitative, high-resolution proteomics for data-driven systems biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 273299 (2011)
  20. Barrera, N. P., Di Bartolo, N., Booth, P. J. & Robinson, C. V. Micelles protect membrane complexes from solution to vacuum. Science 321, 243246 (2008)
  21. Audet, M. & Bouvier, M. Restructuring G-protein-coupled receptor activation. Cell 151, 1423 (2012)
  22. Huang, W. et al. Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 315321 (2015)
  23. Sounier, R. et al. Propagation of conformational changes during μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 524, 375378 (2015)
  24. Dorsch, S., Klotz, K. N., Engelhardt, S., Lohse, M. J. & Bünemann, M. Analysis of receptor oligomerization by FRAP microscopy. Nat. Methods 6, 225230 (2009)
  25. Drew, D. & Boudker, O. Shared molecular mechanisms of membrane transporters. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 543572 (2016)
  26. Herz, K., Rimon, A., Jeschke, G. & Padan, E. β-sheet-dependent dimerization is essential for the stability of NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 63376347 (2009)
  27. Anderluh, A. et al. Single molecule analysis reveals coexistence of stable serotonin transporter monomers and oligomers in the live cell plasma membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 43874394 (2014)
  28. Zhen, J. et al. Dopamine transporter oligomerization: impact of combining protomers with differential cocaine analog binding affinities. J. Neurochem. 133, 167173 (2015)
  29. Coleman, J. A., Green, E. M. & Gouaux, E. X-ray structures and mechanism of the human serotonin transporter. Nature 532, 334339 (2016)
  30. Kilic, F. & Rudnick, G. Oligomerization of serotonin transporter and its functional consequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 31063111 (2000)
  31. Tan, B. K. et al. Discovery of a cardiolipin synthase utilizing phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol as substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1650416509 (2012)
  32. Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y. & Gouaux, E. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 437, 215223 (2005)
  33. Coincon, M. et al. Crystal structures reveal the molecular basis of ion translocation in sodium/proton antiporters. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 248255 (2016)
  34. Lee, C. et al. Crystal structure of the sodium–proton antiporter NhaA dimer and new mechanistic insights. J. Gen. Physiol. 144, 529544 (2014)
  35. Laganowsky, A., Reading, E., Hopper, J. T. & Robinson, C. V. Mass spectrometry of intact membrane protein complexes. Nat. Protocols 8, 639651 (2013)
  36. Hernández, H. & Robinson, C. V. Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry. Nat. Protocols 2, 715726 (2007)
  37. Marty, M. T. et al. Bayesian deconvolution of mass and ion mobility spectra: from binary interactions to polydisperse ensembles. Anal. Chem. 87, 43704376 (2015)
  38. Gault, J. et al. High-resolution mass spectrometry of small molecules bound to membrane proteins. Nat. Methods 13, 333336 (2016)
  39. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 1925 (2015)
  40. Stansfeld, P. J. et al. MemProtMD: automated insertion of membrane protein structures into explicit lipid membranes. Structure 23, 13501361 (2015)
  41. de Jong, D. H. et al. Improved parameters for the martini coarse-grained protein force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 687697 (2013)
  42. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007)
  43. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Vangunsteren, W. F., Dinola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 36843690 (1984)
  44. Hess, B. P-LINCS: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116122 (2008)
  45. Tironi, I. G., Sperb, R., Smith, P. E. & Vangunsteren, W. F. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 102, 54515459 (1995)
  46. Pall, S. & Hess, B. A flexible algorithm for calculating pair interactions on SIMD architectures. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 26412650 (2013)
  47. Stansfeld, P. J. & Sansom, M. S. Molecular simulation approaches to membrane proteins. Structure 19, 15621572 (2011)
  48. Jefferys, E., Sands, Z. A., Shi, J., Sansom, M. S. & Fowler, P. W. Alchembed: a computational method for incorporating multiple proteins into complex lipid geometries. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 27432754 (2015)
  49. Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 23192327 (2011)
  50. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. (2002) http://www.pymol.org/
  51. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774797 (2007)
  52. Sturt, H. F., Summons, R. E., Smith, K., Elvert, M. & Hinrichs, K. U. Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry–new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18, 617628 (2004)
  53. Hopper, J. T. et al. Detergent-free mass spectrometry of membrane protein complexes. Nat. Methods 10, 12061208 (2013)
  54. Barrera, N. P. et al. Mass spectrometry of membrane transporters reveals subunit stoichiometry and interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 585587 (2009)
  55. Wang, S. C. et al. Ion mobility mass spectrometry of two tetrameric membrane protein complexes reveals compact structures and differences in stability and packing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1546815470 (2010)
  56. Reading, E. et al. The role of the detergent micelle in preserving the structure of membrane proteins in the gas phase. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 54, 45774581 (2015)

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Kallol Gupta,
    • Joseph A. C. Donlan &
    • Jonathan T. S. Hopper

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, UK

    • Kallol Gupta,
    • Joseph A. C. Donlan,
    • Jonathan T. S. Hopper,
    • Michael Landreh,
    • Weston B. Struwe,
    • Andrew J. Baldwin &
    • Carol V. Robinson
  2. Centre for Biomembrane Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden

    • Povilas Uzdavinys &
    • David Drew
  3. Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK

    • Phillip J. Stansfeld

Contributions

K.G. and C.V.R. designed the experiments. K.G. and J.A.C.D. performed protein expression and MS experiments. J.T.S.H. performed the high-energy experiments with K.G. K.G. and M.L. performed MS experiments on NapA and NhaA. P.U. expressed and purified NhaA and NapA under the guidance of D.D. J.A.C.D. purified SemiSWEET with the help of W.B.S. P.J.S. carried out molecular dynamics simulations. A.J.B. and K.G. performed theoretical calculations to determine the oligomeric strength. K.G. and C.V.R wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to:

Reviewer Information Nature thanks S. Bernèche, A. Lee and J. Whitelegge for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author details

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figures

  1. Extended Data Figure 1: Mass spectra of LeuT recorded with increasing collision voltages and of a LeuT fusion protein construct. (278 KB)

    a, Mass spectra of LeuT, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, (green/grey spheres, most abundant charge state highlighted in pale blue), show that the 7.4-kDa lipid adduct (blue/purple head groups) is retained throughout the trap collision energy range (white, blue arrow) of the mass spectrometer. b, Mass spectra of LeuT expressed as a fusion protein with eYFP (LeuT–eYFP yellow circles), liberated from octylglucoside micelles, show that the dimer is similarly associated with a 7.4-kDa adduct.

  2. Extended Data Figure 2: Mass spectra of LeuT following incubation with delipidating detergents and E. coli polar lipids. (315 KB)

    a, Mass spectrum of LeuT liberated from octylglucoside micelles (green head groups) shows low-abundance delipidated monomers (green spheres, 59.3 kDa) and high-abundance lipid-bound dimers (green/black spheres, 126.0 kDa). b, Mass spectrum of LeuT after incubation with neopentyl glycol (NG, orange head-groups) shows only delipidated monomers. c, Mass spectrum of LeuT in octylglucoside (OG), after incubation with neopentyl glycol, shows only delipidated monomers. d, Mass spectrum recorded after incubation of delipidated LeuT monomers, in octylglucoside, with E. coli polar lipids (blue/purple head-groups) shows delipidated monomers and lipid-bound dimers. e, Mass spectrum recorded after adding dilysocardiolipin (blue head-groups) to delipidated monomeric LeuT in octylglucoside (c) shows no dimerization in the presence of this lipid.

  3. Extended Data Figure 3: High-energy MS/MS experiment of the 23+ charge state of dimeric LeuT, with the 7.4-kDa adduct, as a function of collision voltage. (395 KB)

    Three satellite peaks represent the lipid-bound states arising through the dissociation of the monomer. The naked monomer is highlighted in blue, while the three satellite peaks are assigned to one phospholipid, one cardiolipin and three phospholipid-bound species (red, green and yellow, respectively). Under higher energy, only the cardiolipin-bound species remains, discounting the mathematical possibility of two phospholipid-bound species. Inset shows the isolated 23+ charge state of the lipid bound dimer. Presence of bound cardiolipin at a higher energy, over that of phospholipid, indicates a higher binding energy of cardiolipin over the latter, potentially owing to greater ionic and hydrophobic interactions.

  4. Extended Data Figure 4: Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues at the LeuT dimer interface, resulting mass spectra and molecular dynamics simulations. (222 KB)

    a, Mass spectrum of LeuT F488A/Y489A, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, reveals monomeric LeuT (green spheres). Inset shows the LeuT dimer interface, with key π-stacking interactions (yellow dotted lines, distances labelled in red) and between aromatic residues (purple). When residues F488 and Y489 (orange arrows) are mutated to alanine, the π-stacking interactions are abolished and LeuT cannot dimerize. b, Molecular dynamics simulations of LeuT in an E. coli lipid bilayer reveal possible binding sites of interfacial phospholipids and cardiolipin (upper panel, viewed from cytoplasmic side of membrane). The cardiolipin phosphate groups (orange) interact closely with positively charged residues (K376, H377, R506; blue) at the dimer interface. Phosphoethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) also bind at the dimer interface. c, Mass spectrum of LeuT expressed in a cardiolipin-deficient E. coli strain (BKT22), liberated from octylglucoside micelles, shows monomeric LeuT, implying that cardiolipin is required for LeuT dimerization. d, Mass spectrum of LeuT K376A/H377A, liberated from octylglucoside micelles, shows monomeric LeuT.

  5. Extended Data Figure 5: CGMD simulations on LeuT and NhaA dimer. (421 KB)

    a, Particle densities from five repeats of 1-μs CGMD simulations for cardiolipin around LeuT. The surface densities represent the most occupied positions from the simulations of the phosphate (orange), glycerol (red) and alkyl tails (purple) particles of cardiolipin. The proposed binding sites at the interface are the only places where cardiolipin shows considerable population density. bd, Comparative particle densities of cardiolipin (b), phosphatidylglycerol (c) and phosphoethanolamine (d) at the LeuT dimeric interface, summed over the simulations show no or minimal densities for phosphatidylglycerol and phosphoethanolamine at the cardiolipin-binding site. Together, ad show that the proposed binding sites of cardiolipin at the interface are sites of specific bindings. e, Dimeric structure of LeuT with modelled APT (aminopentanetetrol, aminophospholipids) classes of lipid present in A. aeolicus52. The lipid was drawn in ChemDraw and subsequently modelled by superimposition onto cardiolipin to give the cardiolipin-bound dimeric structure. The favourable van der Waals distances show that it is capable of bridging the dimeric entity through the same sets of residues that were found to be critical towards cardiolipin binding, in an endogenous environment lacking cardiolipins. f, Particle densities from five repeats of 1-μs CGMD simulations for cardiolipin (phosphate group in orange, glycerol in red and alkyl tails in purple) and POPG (in blue) around NhaA dimer interface. As before, the density of cardiolipin is considerably higher than that of phosphatidylglycerol. However, unlike LeuT, here the difference between the density of cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol is lower, suggesting this site has less exclusivity towards cardiolipin than that in LeuT. Indeed, mass spectrometry analysis shows a heterogenous distribution of lipids with dimeric NhaA, with mostly cardiolipin but some amount of bound phospholipids.

  6. Extended Data Figure 6: Mass spectra of His-tagged and unmodified SemiSWEET and identification of endogenous and exogenous lipid binding. (204 KB)

    a, Mass spectrum of unmodified SemiSWEET, liberated from tetraethyleneglycolmonooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles, reveals SemiSWEET monomers and dimers (black spheres). b, Mass spectrum of deca-His tagged SemiSWEET, liberated from C8E4 micelles, reveals SemiSWEET monomers and dimers (green spheres). c, High energy MS/MS of unmodified SemiSWEET, liberated from dodecylmaltoside (DDM) micelles, allows isolation of the 6+ charge state (black spheres) of the SemiSWEET monomer (black spheres) bound to endogenous lipids. Fragmentation of the lipid-bound species leads to loss of either cardiolipin (1,470 ± 26 Da, purple head-groups), one or two neutral phospholipids (each 756 ± 22 Da, blue head-groups), or a positively charged phospholipid. Trap collision voltages are shown in white inside the blue arrow. d, Mass spectrum of deca-His SemiSWEET, liberated from C8E4 micelles and incubated with phosphatidylglycerol (blue head-groups). phosphatidylglycerol binds to both monomers and dimers (dotted boxes highlight lipid-bound peaks) without substantial preference. e, Mass spectrum recorded after incubation in solution of an equimolar ratio of deca-His tagged and untagged SemiSWEET (green and black spheres, respectively), liberated from tetraethyleneglycolmonooctyl ether (C8E4) micelles. Plot of the percentage abundance of hetero- and homodimers over time (inset), SemiSWEET heterodimers (red trace, peaks highlighted red in mass spectrum) and homodimers (black trace), revealing the solution-phase monomer–dimer equilibrium (PDB accession number: 4QND).

  7. Extended Data Figure 7: Mass spectrum and high-energy MS/MS of NhaA at a range of collision voltages. (188 KB)

    a, Mass spectrum of NhaA, liberated from C8E4 micelles, reveals NhaA monomers (green spheres) bound to cardiolipin (purple head-groups) and an ensemble of NhaA dimer species in different lipidation states (highlighted in green). b, MS/MS of the 15+ charge state (green) of the NhaA dimer (green/black spheres) bound to two cardiolipin molecules liberated from C8E4 micelles. Increasing collision voltage applied to the 2× cardiolipin-bound species leads either to loss of 1 cardiolipin to form NhaA dimers bound to 1 cardiolipin (40 V) or to loss of 2 cardiolipin molecules to form delipidated NhaA dimers, with concomitant generation of NhaA monomers (70 V) and further dissociation of NhaA dimers into monomers (120 V). Trap collision voltages are depicted in white, inside the blue arrow.

  8. Extended Data Figure 8: Sequence and structure alignment of LeuT with other eukaryotic biogenic transporters. (967 KB)

    a, The basic residues of LeuT that are involved in lipid binding (red box) are conserved across the BATs. b, Two views of the superimposed structures of LeuT (PDB accession number: 2A65, black) and SERT (PDB accession number: 5I6Z, light blue) show the differences in the dimer interface. Dimer interface helices are highlighted with arrows and coloured (LeuT, green; SERT, red); basic residues responsible for lipid binding in LeuT are shown in yellow mesh. One of the interface helices in SERT swings away from the interface, negating the possibility of lipid-induced oligomerization, analogous to that proposed for LeuT.

Extended Data Tables

  1. Extended Data Table 1: Summary of the mass spectral analysis of membrane proteins forming strong oligomers (155 KB)

Supplementary information

Excel files

  1. Supplementary Table 1 (22 KB)

    Total buried surface area and the number salt bridges for each of the oligomeric proteins. The respective PDB IDs are also provided

Additional data