Post-publication peer review is becoming increasingly popular, but authors need more incentive to self-correct and amend the scientific record (see D. B. Allison et al. Nature 530, 27–29; 2016). We propose that failure by authors to correct their mistakes should be classified as scientific misconduct. This policy has already been implemented by our institute, and we encourage research institutions and funding bodies to follow suit (see go.nature.com/dgifft).
The responsibility to correct errors lies mainly with the criticized authors. Snubbing criticism by not addressing it promptly runs counter to our fundamental ethos as scientists, and threatens to erode society's trust in the scientific community.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
CONTRIBUTIONS Correspondence may be sent to correspondence@nature.com after consulting the guidelines at http://go.nature.com/cmchno.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamoun, S., Zipfel, C. Class uncorrected errors as misconduct. Nature 531, 173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/531173e
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/531173e