Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evolution of the new vertebrate head by co-option of an ancient chordate skeletal tissue

Abstract

A defining feature of vertebrates (craniates) is a pronounced head that is supported and protected by a robust cellular endoskeleton. In the first vertebrates, this skeleton probably consisted of collagenous cellular cartilage, which forms the embryonic skeleton of all vertebrates and the adult skeleton of modern jawless and cartilaginous fish. In the head, most cellular cartilage is derived from a migratory cell population called the neural crest, which arises from the edges of the central nervous system. Because collagenous cellular cartilage and neural crest cells have not been described in invertebrates1, the appearance of cellular cartilage derived from neural crest cells is considered a turning point in vertebrate evolution2. Here we show that a tissue with many of the defining features of vertebrate cellular cartilage transiently forms in the larvae of the invertebrate chordate Branchiostoma floridae (Florida amphioxus). We also present evidence that during evolution, a key regulator of vertebrate cartilage development, SoxE, gained new cis-regulatory sequences that subsequently directed its novel expression in neural crest cells. Together, these results suggest that the origin of the vertebrate head skeleton did not depend on the evolution of a new skeletal tissue, as is commonly thought, but on the spread of this tissue throughout the head. We further propose that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements near an ancient regulator of cartilage differentiation was a major factor in the evolution of the vertebrate head skeleton.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Development of the amphioxus oral skeleton.
Figure 2: The amphioxus oral skeleton requires FGF-mediated signalling for formation and expresses orthologues of vertebrate cartilage markers.
Figure 3: A reporter construct incorporating the amphioxus SoxE locus recapitulates the amphioxus SoxE expression pattern in zebrafish embryos.
Figure 4: The evolution of the vertebrate head skeleton via co-option of an ancient cellular cartilage gene program.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Medeiros, D. M. The evolution of the neural crest: new perspectives from lamprey and invertebrate neural crest-like cells. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 1–15 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gans, C. & Northcutt, R. G. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head. Science 220, 268–273 (1983)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Witten, P. E., Huysseune, A. & Hall, B. K. A practical approach for the identification of the many cartilaginous tissues in teleost fish. J. Appl. Ichthyology 26, 257–262 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, A. G. & Hall, B. K. The nature and significance of invertebrate cartilages revisited: distribution and histology of cartilage and cartilage-like tissues within the Metazoa. Zoology (Jena) 107, 261–273 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rychel, A. L. & Swalla, B. J. Development and evolution of chordate cartilage. J. Exp. Zool. 308B, 325–335 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wright, G. M., Keeley, F. W. & Robson, P. The unusual cartilaginous tissues of jawless craniates, cephalochordates and invertebrates. Cell Tissue Res. 304, 165–174 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaneto, S. & Wada, H. Regeneration of amphioxus oral cirri and its skeletal rods: implications for the origin of the vertebrate skeleton. J. Exp. Zool. 316B, 409–417 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paris, M. et al. Amphioxus postembryonic development reveals the homology of chordate metamorphosis. Curr. Biol. 18, 825–830 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walshe, J. & Mason, I. Fgf signalling is required for formation of cartilage in the head. Dev. Biol. 264, 522–536 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jandzik, D. et al. Roles for FGF in lamprey pharyngeal pouch formation and skeletogenesis highlight ancestral functions in the vertebrate head. Development 141, 629–638 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammadi, M. et al. Structures of the tyrosine kinase domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor in complex with inhibitors. Science 276, 955–960 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Favata, M. F. et al. Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18623–18632 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bi, W. M., Deng, J. M., Zhang, Z. P., Behringer, R. R. & de Crombrugghe, B. Sox9 is required for cartilage formation. Nature Genet. 22, 85–89 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lefebvre, V., Li, P. & de Crombrugghe, B. A new long form of Sox5 (L-Sox5), Sox6 and Sox9 are coexpressed in chondrogenesis and cooperatively activate the type II collagen gene. EMBO J. 17, 5718–5733 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, M., Ray, P. & Chapman, S. C. Fibroblast growth factor and bone morphogenetic protein signaling are required for specifying prechondrogenic identity in neural crest-derived mesenchyme and initiating the chondrogenic program. Dev. Dyn. 241, 1091–1103 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McCauley, D. W. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Importance of SoxE in neural crest development and the evolution of the pharynx. Nature 441, 750–752 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohtani, K. et al. Expression of Sox and fibrillar collagen genes in lamprey larval chondrogenesis with implications for the evolution of vertebrate cartilage. J. Exp. Zool. 310B, 596–607 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Znosko, W. A. et al. Overlapping functions of Pea3 ETS transcription factors in FGF signaling during zebrafish development. Dev. Biol. 342, 11–25 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, C. Y., Scott, D. A., Hatch, E., Tian, X. Y. & Mansour, S. L. Dusp6 (Mkp3) is a negative feedback regulator of FGF-stimulated ERK signaling during mouse development. Development 134, 167–176 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Conklin, E. G. The embryology of amphioxus. J. Morphol. 54, 69–151 (1932)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Betancur, P., Bronner-Fraser, M. & Sauka-Spengler, T. Genomic code for Sox10 activation reveals a key regulatory enhancer for cranial neural crest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3570–3575 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Otterloo, E. et al. Novel Tfap2-mediated control of soxE expression facilitated the evolutionary emergence of the neural crest. Development 139, 720–730 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakiza, O., Miller, S., Bunce, A., Lee, E. M. J. & McCauley, D. W. SoxE gene duplication and development of the lamprey branchial skeleton: insights into development and evolution of the neural crest. Dev. Biol. 359, 149–161 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sauka-Spengler, T., Meulemans, D., Jones, M. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Ancient evolutionary origin of the neural crest gene regulatory network. Dev. Cell 13, 405–420 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cossais, F. et al. Replacement of mouse Sox10 by the Drosophila ortholog Sox100B provides evidence for co-option of SoxE proteins into vertebrate-specific gene-regulatory networks through altered expression. Dev. Biol. 341, 267–281 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Manzanares, M. et al. Conservation and elaboration of Hox gene regulation during evolution of the vertebrate head. Nature 408, 854–857 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meulemans, D. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Insights from amphioxus into the evolution of vertebrate cartilage. PLoS ONE 2, e787 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, W. & Cornell, R. A. Redundant activities of Tfap2a and Tfap2c are required for neural crest induction and development of other non-neural ectoderm derivatives in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Biol. 304, 338–354 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, J. Y., Huang, D. Y. & Li, C. W. An early Cambrian craniate-like chordate. Nature 402, 518–522 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Paris, M. et al. Amphioxus postembryonic development reveals the homology of chordate metamorphosis. Curr. Biol. 18, 825–830 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Neill, P., McCole, R. B. & Baker, C. V. H. A molecular analysis of neurogenic placode and cranial sensory ganglion development in the shark, Scyliorhinus canicula. Dev. Biol. 304, 156–181 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, J. K. et al. A cDNA resource for the cephalochordate amphioxus Branchiostoma floridae. Dev. Genes Evol. 218, 723–727 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Putnam, N. H. et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453, 1064–1071 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gong, S. C., Kus, L. & Heintz, N. Rapid bacterial artificial chromosome modification for large-scale mouse transgenesis. Nature Protocols 5, 1678–1696 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Villefranc, J. A., Amigo, J. & Lawson, N. D. Gateway compatible vectors for analysis of gene function in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3077–3087 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawakami, K. et al. A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 7, 133–144 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cameron, T. L., Belluoccio, D., Farlie, P. G., Brachvogel, B. & Bateman, J. F. Global comparative transcriptome analysis of cartilage formation in vivo. BMC Dev. Biol. 9, 20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Brunelle, C.-H. Tung and T.-K. Huang for assistance with amphioxus husbandry, and P. Tsai and D. W. Stock for use of their microtomes. D.M.M., D.J., TA.S. and M.V.C. were supported by National Science Foundation grants IOS 1257040 and IOS 1160733 (D.M.M.) and University of Colorado, Boulder start-up funds (D.M.M.). A.T.G. was supported by National Science Foundation grant DBI 0905991. J.-K.Y. was supported by National Science Council Taiwan grants NSC101-2923-B-001-004-MY2 and NSC102-2311-B-001-011-MY3 and Career Development Award AS-98-CDA-L06 from Academia Sinica Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M.M. designed the project and wrote the manuscript. D.J., A.T.G. and T.A.S. performed the experiments and prepared the images; D.J. assembled the figures; and M.V.C. and J.-K.Y. provided materials and reagents. All authors discussed the results and provided input on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel M. Medeiros.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Amphioxus oral cartilage differentiation is initiated before cirrus outgrowth and requires FGF-mediated signalling.

a, b, Phase contrast images of a metamorphic amphioxus larva. a, The differentiation of cartilage rods occurs first in the rim of the mouth. b, The cartilage rods later grow outwards into nascent cirri. c, Toluidine blue staining of a JB-4-embedded control larval section showing the oral cartilage rod (red rectangle; arrows in f) embedded in the rim of the mouth. d, e, Toluidine blue staining of two representative SU5402-treated larvae, sectioned at the same level as the larva in c. The differentiation of the oral cartilage bar is completely eliminated in d and is strongly reduced in e. fh, High magnification views of the sections in ce.

Extended Data Figure 2 Expression of SoxE, ColA and FGF signalling components in the oral region of metamorphic amphioxus larvae.

al, In situ hybridization was performed on transverse sections in the planes shown in a. b, A high magnification view of cirri hybridized with a probe against ColA. ColA mRNA was detected in the central cartilage rod, which is a single stack of discoidal chondrocytes. c, A high magnification view of cirri hybridized with a probe against SoxE. SoxE mRNA was detected in the central cartilage rod. d, A high magnification view of cirri hybridized with a probe against FGFR. e, f, High magnification views of cirri hybridized with a probe against Ets. gi, High magnification views of cirri hybridized with a probe against ColA. j, k, High magnification views of cirri hybridized with a probe against DUSP6/7/9. l, A high magnification view of cirri hybridized with a probe against DUSP1/4/5, an orthologue of mouse Dusp4, a gene that is expressed at high levels in mesoderm-derived chondrocytes37. In all panels, the arrows indicate expression in oral chondrocytes, and the arrowheads indicate expression in the associated oral mesothelial cells.

Extended Data Figure 3 Activity of the amphioxus SoxE reporter construct in zebrafish during development.

Injected zebrafish embryos displaying broad GFP fluorescence and normal morphology were processed for in situ hybridization to detect GFP mRNA. Embryos were scored for the expression of GFP in five or more cells in each domain. a, A map of the expression domains scored in 15-somite and 18-somite embryos. b, A representative 4-day larva showing sporadic expression in the heart region and trunk muscles (arrows in insets). The scored domains are outlined. The image is a composite of eight photographs of the same larva taken at different focal planes. c, A representative 18-somite tfap2a and tfap2c dual knockdown morphant (tfap2a/c morphant)28 expressing the amphioxus SoxE reporter. The image is a composite of four photographs of the same embryo taken at different focal planes. The tfap2a/c morphants28 displayed a highly penetrant and almost complete loss of NCC marker expression, including sox10 (a co-orthologue of amphioxus SoxE). Like wildtype embryos, tfap2a/c morphant embryos displayed mosaic expression of the amphioxus SoxE reporter in the neural tube (double arrowheads) and tail bud (arrow). The ability of the amphioxus SoxE reporter to function in tfap2-depleted embryos supports expression data27 suggesting that amphioxus SoxE transcription is Tfap2 independent. d, The numbers and frequencies of embryos and larvae with GFP expression in the indicated domains. The numbers in each column are the pooled results of two to four separate experiments.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jandzik, D., Garnett, A., Square, T. et al. Evolution of the new vertebrate head by co-option of an ancient chordate skeletal tissue. Nature 518, 534–537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14000

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14000

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing