Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Worldwide acceleration of mountain erosion under a cooling climate

Subjects

Abstract

Climate influences the erosion processes acting at the Earth’s surface. However, the effect of cooling during the Late Cenozoic era, including the onset of Pliocene–Pleistocene Northern Hemisphere glaciation (about two to three million years ago), on global erosion rates remains unclear1,2,3,4. The uncertainty arises mainly from a lack of consensus on the use of the sedimentary record as a proxy for erosion3,4 and the difficulty of isolating the respective contributions of tectonics and climate to erosion5,6,7. Here we compile 18,000 bedrock thermochronometric ages from around the world and use a formal inversion procedure8 to estimate temporal and spatial variations in erosion rates. This allows for the quantification of erosion for the source areas that ultimately produce the sediment record on a timescale of millions of years. We find that mountain erosion rates have increased since about six million years ago and most rapidly since two million years ago. The increase of erosion rates is observed at all latitudes, but is most pronounced in glaciated mountain ranges, indicating that glacial processes played an important part. Because mountains represent a considerable fraction of the global production of sediments9, our results imply an increase in sediment flux at a global scale that coincides closely with enhanced cooling during the Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs10,11.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Erosion rates and their variations over the past 6 Myr, resolved into 2-Myr time steps.
Figure 2: Relative frequency and cumulative distributions of the ratio of erosion rates between 2–0 Myr ago and 6–4 Myr ago.
Figure 3: Mountain erosion rates and δ18O measurements during the Late Cenozoic era.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang, P., Molnar, P. & Downs, W. R. Increased sedimentation rates and grain sizes 2–4 Myr ago due to the influence of climate change on erosion rates. Nature 410, 891–897 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Molnar, P. Late Cenozoic increase in accumulation rates of terrestrial sediment: how might climate change have affected erosion rates? Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 32, 67–89 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schumer, R. & Jerolmack, D. J. Real and apparent changes in sediment deposition rates through time. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F00A06 (2009)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Willenbring, J. K. & von Blanckenburg, F. Long-term stability of global erosion rates and weathering during late-Cenozoic cooling. Nature 465, 211–214 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Blanckenburg, F. The control mechanism of erosion and weathering at basin scale from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 462–479 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Whipple, K. X. The influence of climate on the tectonic evolution of mountain belts. Nature Geosci. 2, 97–104 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Champagnac, J.-D., Molnar, P., Sue, C. & Herman, F. Tectonics, climate, and mountain topography. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B02403 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, M., Herman, F., Willett, S. D. & May, A. D. A linear inversion method to infer exhumation rates in space and time from thermochronometric data. Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss. 1, 207–259 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Milliman, J. D. & Syvitski, J. P. M. Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers. J. Geol. 100, 525–544 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shackleton, N. J. & Opdyke, N. D. Oxygen isotope and paleomagnetic evidence for early Northern Hemisphere glaciation. Nature 270, 216–219 (1977)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuster, D. L., Ehlers, T. A., Rusmore, M. E. & Farley, K. A. Rapid glacial erosion at 1.8 Ma revealed by 4He/3He thermochronometry. Science 310, 1668–1670 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger, A. L. et al. Quaternary tectonic response to intensified glacial erosion in an orogenic wedge. Nature Geosci. 1, 793–799 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vernon, A. J., van der Beek, P. A., Sinclair, H. D. & Rahn, M. K. Increase in late Neogene denudation of the European Alps confirmed by analysis of a fission track thermochronology database. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 270, 316–329 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson, S. N. et al. Glaciation as a destructive and constructive control on mountain building. Nature 467, 313–317 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shuster, D. L., Cuffey, K. M., Sanders, J. W. & Balco, G. Thermochronometry reveals headward propagation of erosion in an alpine landscape. Science 332, 84–88 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valla, P. G. et al. Late Neogene exhumation and relief development of the Aar and Aiguilles Rouges massifs (Swiss Alps) from low-temperature thermochronology modeling and 4He/3He thermochronometry. J. Geophys. Res. 117, F01004 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steer, P., Huismans, R. S., Valla, P. G., Gac, S. & Herman, F. Bimodal Plio-Quaternary glacial erosion of fjords and low-relief surfaces in Scandinavia. Nature Geosci. 5, 635–639 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reiners, P. W. & Brandon, M. T. Using thermochronology to understand orogenic erosion. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 419–466 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Montgomery, D. R. & Brandon, M. T. Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 201, 481–489 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thiede, R. C. & Ehlers, T. A. Large spatial and temporal variations in Himalayan denudation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 371–372, 278–293 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lague, D., Hovius, N. & Davy, P. Discharge, discharge variability, and the bedrock channel profile. J. Geophys. Res. 110, F04006 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. DiBiase, R. A. & Whipple, K. X. The influence of erosion thresholds and runoff variability on the relationships among topography, climate, and erosion rate. J. Geophys. Res. 116, F04036 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pedersen, V. K. & Egholm, D. L. Glaciations in response to climate variations preconditioned by evolving topography. Nature 493, 206–210 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sternai, P., Herman, F., Valla, P. G. & Champagnac, J.-D. Spatial and temporal variations of glacial erosion in the Rhone valley (Swiss Alps): insights from numerical modeling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 368, 119–131 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Willenbring, J. K., Codilean, A. T. & McElroy, B. Earth is (mostly) flat: apportionment of the flux of continental sediment over millennial time scales. Geology 41, 343–346 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seki, O. et al. Alkenone and boron-based Pliocene pCO2 records. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 292, 201–211 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bartoli, G., Hönisch, B. & Zeebe, R. E. Atmospheric CO2 decline during the Pliocene intensification of Northern Hemisphere glaciations. Paleoceanography 26, PA4213 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Raymo, M. E., Ruddiman, W. F. & Froelich, P. N. Influence of late Cenozoic mountain building on ocean geochemical cycles. Geology 16, 649–653 (1988)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moore, J., Jacobson, A. D., Holmden, C. & Craw, D. Tracking the relationship between mountain uplift, silicate weathering, and long-term CO2 consumption with Ca isotopes: southern Alps, New Zealand. Chem. Geol. 341, 110–127 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. West, A. J., Galy, A. & Bickle, M. Tectonic and climatic controls on silicate weathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 235, 211–228 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Galy, V. et al. Efficient organic carbon burial in the Bengal fan sustained by the Himalayan erosional system. Nature 450, 407–410 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mancktelow, N. S. & Grasemann, B. Time-dependent effects of heat advection and topography on cooling histories during erosion. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 270, 167–195 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dodson, M. H. Closure temperatures in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 40, 259–274 (1973)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Aster, R., Borchers, B. & Thurber, C. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tarantola, A. Inverse Problem Theory (SIAM, 2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Farley, K. A. Helium diffusion from apatite: general behavior as illustrated by Durango fluorapatite. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 2903–2914 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gleadow, A. J. W. & Duddy, I. R. A natural long-term track annealing experiment for apatite. Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 5, 169–174 (1981)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Green, P. F. et al. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite IV: quantitative modelling techniques and extension to geological timescales. Chem. Geol. 79, 155–182 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hurford, A. J. Uplift and cooling pathways derived from fission track analysis and mica dating: a review. Geol. Rundsch. 80, 349–368 (1991)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hurford, A. J. & Green, P. F. A users’ guide to fission track dating calibration. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 59, 343–354 (1982)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Farr, T. G. et al. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG2004 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Farley, K. A., Wolf, R. & Silver, L. The effect of long alpha-stopping distances on (U-Th)/He dates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 4223–4229 (1996)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Menke, W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory MATLAB edn, 3rd edn (Elsevier, 2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Ehlers, T. A. & Farley, K. A. Apatite (U-Th)/He thermochronometry: methods and applications to problems in tectonic and surface processes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 206, 1–14 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ehlers, T. A. Crustal thermal processes and thermochronometer interpretation. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 58, 315–350 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Braun, J., van der Beek, P. A. & Batt, G. Quantitative Thermochronology: Numerical Methods for the Interpretation of Thermochronological Data (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Wagner, G. A. & Reimer, G. M. Fission track tectonics: the tectonic interpretation of fission track apatite ages. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 14, 263–268 (1972)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gallagher, K., Stephenson, J., Brown, R., Holmes, C. & Fitzgerald, P. Low temperature thermochronology and modeling strategies for multiple samples. 1: Vertical profiles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 193–208 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mancktelow, N. & Grasemann, B. Time-dependent effects of heat advection and topography on cooling histories during erosion. Tectonophysics 270, 167–195 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Braun, J. et al. Quantifying rates of landscape evolution and tectonic processes by thermochronology and numerical modeling of crustal heat transport using PECUBE. Tectonophysics 524–525, 1–28 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sambridge, M. Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int. 138, 479–494 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sambridge, M. Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophys. J. Int. 138, 727–746 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Herman, F. et al. Exhumation, crustal deformation, and thermal structure of the Nepal Himalaya derived from the inversion of thermochronological and thermobarometric data and modeling of the topography. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B06407 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Shuster, D. L., Farley, K. A., Sisteron, J. M. & Burnett, D. S. Quantifying the diffusion kinetics and spatial distributions of radiogenic 4He in minerals containing proton-induced 3He. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 217, 19–32 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Guralnik, B. et al. Effective closure temperature in leaky or saturating thermochronometers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 384, 209–218 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Li, B. & Li, S.-H. Determining the cooling age using luminescence-thermochronology. Tectonophysics 580, 242–248 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Suppe, J. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding. Am. J. Sci. 283, 684–721 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.-D. Champagnac and M. Brandon for discussions throughout the study. We also thank S. Jaccard and P. Molnar for their feedback on the manuscript and K. Huntington for her constructive review. The computations presented here were performed on the Brutus facility at ETH Zurich, Switzerland. F.H. was funded by SNF grant PP00P2_138956.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.H. designed the study and carried out the data interpretation. F.H., D.S., P.G.V., A.C., B.K. and T.A.E. contributed to compiling the data. All authors contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Herman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Compilation of thermochronometric ages.

See the source data and associated references in the Supplementary Information for sample locations, elevations, ages and standard error measurements.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 2 Global inversion sensitivity tests.

a, Same as Fig. 3b, but using different prior erosion rates eP (equation (4) in Methods), as indicated on the figure. b, Same as Fig. 3b, but using different initial near-surface unperturbed geothermal gradients G0. See text for details.

Extended Data Figure 3 One-dimensional inversion results for four different erosion histories.

The red curve is the erosion history used to generate synthetic thermochronometric ages. The ages (Myr) for each test are indicated on the figure. The black lines are the most likely solution obtained from the Bayesian inversion. The grey areas represent the 1σ uncertainty around the most likely erosion rate solution. The blue lines are the results of the linear inversion (Methods and ref. 8). The panels on the left depict inversion results using all four systems; the middle panels use AHe and AFT only; and the right panels use AFT only. See text for details.

Extended Data Figure 4 Thermochronometric data from Patagonia15.

See Extended Data Fig. 1 and ref. 15 for further details.

Extended Data Figure 5 Inversion results of Patagonia thermochronometric data set15.

The upper panels are erosion rates predicted by the inverse method8. The lower panels are resolution estimates (with 0.25 contours).

Extended Data Figure 6 Inversion results of ZFT Patagonia data only.

Upper panels are predicted erosion rates with the inverse method8. Lower panels are resolution estimates (with 0.25 contours).

Extended Data Figure 7 Set-up for the three-dimensional thermo-kinematic model.

a, Topography and horizontal extent. b, Vertical extent, initial unperturbed temperature field and imposed kinematic field.

Extended Data Figure 8 Inversion results on three-dimensional synthetic data.

a, Inversion on synthetic data produced with constant 5 mm yr−1 slip rates. b, Same as a using a 1 mm yr−1 slip rate. c, Same as b, but with a slip rate that increases from 1 mm yr−1 to 5 mm yr−1 in the past 2 Myr. Left panels are erosion rates and right panels are resolution estimates.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the references of the compiled thermochronometric data. (PDF 414 kb)

Supplementary Table

This file contains the erosion rate model Supplementary Table. It includes longitude (°), latitude (°), erosion rates (mm/yr) and resolution. These are the values used for Figures 1, 2 and 3. Note the rates are reported at grid points around existing data location for ease of visualization and reduce weight due the sampling density. Only points from fast eroding areas and with resolution higher than 0.25 for all four time steps are used in Figure 2 and 3b. This file was replaced on 20 December 2013. (PDF 4347 kb)

The time evolution of global erosion rates over the last 8 Myr, resolved into 2 Myr time steps

The time evolution of global erosion rates over the last 8 Myr, resolved into 2 Myr time steps (see main manuscript and Figure 1 for details). (MOV 1653 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herman, F., Seward, D., Valla, P. et al. Worldwide acceleration of mountain erosion under a cooling climate. Nature 504, 423–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12877

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing