Control of somatic tissue differentiation by the long non-coding RNA TINCR

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
493,
Pages:
231–235
Date published:
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature11661
Received
Accepted
Published online

Several of the thousands of human long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been functionally characterized1, 2, 3, 4; however, potential roles for lncRNAs in somatic tissue differentiation remain poorly understood. Here we show that a 3.7-kilobase lncRNA, terminal differentiation-induced ncRNA (TINCR), controls human epidermal differentiation by a post-transcriptional mechanism. TINCR is required for high messenger RNA abundance of key differentiation genes, many of which are mutated in human skin diseases, including FLG, LOR, ALOXE3, ALOX12B, ABCA12, CASP14 and ELOVL3. TINCR-deficient epidermis lacked terminal differentiation ultrastructure, including keratohyalin granules and intact lamellar bodies. Genome-scale RNA interactome analysis revealed that TINCR interacts with a range of differentiation mRNAs. TINCR–mRNA interaction occurs through a 25-nucleotide ‘TINCR box’ motif that is strongly enriched in interacting mRNAs and required for TINCR binding. A high-throughput screen to analyse TINCR binding capacity to approximately 9,400 human recombinant proteins revealed direct binding of TINCR RNA to the staufen1 (STAU1) protein. STAU1-deficient tissue recapitulated the impaired differentiation seen with TINCR depletion. Loss of UPF1 and UPF2, both of which are required for STAU1-mediated RNA decay, however, did not have differentiation effects. Instead, the TINCR–STAU1 complex seems to mediate stabilization of differentiation mRNAs, such as KRT80. These data identify TINCR as a key lncRNA required for somatic tissue differentiation, which occurs through lncRNA binding to differentiation mRNAs to ensure their expression.

At a glance

Figures

  1. TINCR is induced during epidermal differentiation.
    Figure 1: TINCR is induced during epidermal differentiation.

    a, Mean-centred, hierarchical clustering of 258 annotated non-coding RNAs altered (>twofold change) in undifferentiated cells (day 0) and during days of calcium-induced differentiation in vitro. b, Schematic of TINCR genomic locus on chromosome 19. Day 0, 3 and 6 of keratinocyte (KC) differentiation; blue rectangles represent exons. c, Relative TINCR abundance in fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM). d, TINCR qRT–PCR. Error bars are s.d., n = 4. e, Northern blot analysis, with TINCR the single band seen in differentiation; bp, base pairs.

  2. TINCR regulates epidermal differentiation genes involved in barrier formation.
    Figure 2: TINCR regulates epidermal differentiation genes involved in barrier formation.

    a, Loss of differentiation proteins in TINCR-depleted organotypic human epidermis by independent TINCR siRNAs (siTINCRA and siTINCRB) versus scrambled control (siControl); nuclei stained blue (Hoechst 33342). Scale bars,50μm. b, mRNA expression in TINCR-deficient tissue versus control; duplicate biological replicates for duplicate independent TINCR siRNAs. Error bars are s.d., n = 6. c, GO terms significantly enriched in the TINCR-depleted gene subset. d, mRNA expression of lipid barrier synthesis genes in TINCR-depleted tissue. Error bars denote s.d., n = 4. e, Loss of protein-rich keratohyalin granules (arrows in control) in TINCR-deficient organotypic human epidermis. St, stratum. Scale bars, 10μm. f, Loss of normal lipid-containing lamellar bodies (arrows in control, top image) in TINCR-depleted tissue (bottom image) (n = 3). Scale bars, 100nm.

  3. TINCR interacts with differentiation mRNAs and STAU1 protein.
    Figure 3: TINCR interacts with differentiation mRNAs and STAU1 protein.

    a, Enriched GO terms in TINCR-interacting genes detected by RIA-Seq. b, Protein microarray analysis detects TINCR RNA binding to STAU1 protein. Human recombinant protein microarray spotted with approximately 9,400 proteins (left); enlarged 144 protein spot subarray (middle) demonstrating strand-specific binding of TINCR sense strand to STAU1 protein (right); DUPD1 protein negative control is shown. Alexa-Fluor-647-labelled rabbit anti-mouse IgG in the top left corner of each subarray. c, STAU1 protein immunoprecipitation pulls down TINCR RNA. ANCR and LINC1 (also known as XIST) represent lncRNA controls. d, Streptavidin precipitation of in vitro synthesized biotinylated TINCR RNA pulls down STAU1 protein. HA, haemagglutinin; WB, western blot.

  4. Differentiation regulation by TINCR RNA and STAU1 protein.
    Figure 4: Differentiation regulation by TINCR RNA and STAU1 protein.

    a, Diminished expression of TINCR-regulated genes in STAU1-depleted organotypic tissue in independent biological replicates for duplicate independent STAU1 siRNA treatments. Error bars are s.d., n = 3. b, Overlap of 672 genes regulated by TINCR and STAU1 c, Location of the TINCR box motif in TINCR as well as selected TINCR-associated differentiation mRNAs. RIA, RNA interactome analysis. d, TINCR motif base-pairing between the TINCR transcript and PGLYRP3 differentiation gene mRNA. e, Biotinylated TINCR RNA with or without STAU1 protein pulls down the full-length 1,077-bp PGLYRP3 mRNA at higher efficiency than TINCR box-depleted PGLYRP3 (PGLYRP3Δ96bp). Error bars denote s.d. and are too small to be visible for the PGLYRP3Δ96 samples; n = 3.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223227 (2009)
  2. Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1166711672 (2009)
  3. Rinn, J. L. et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell 129, 13111323 (2007)
  4. Martianov, I., Ramadass, A., Serra Barros, A., Chow, N. & Akoulitchev, A. Repression of the human dihydrofolate reductase gene by a non-coding interfering transcript. Nature 445, 666670 (2007)
  5. Pauli, A., Rinn, J. L. & Schier, A. F. Non-coding RNAs as regulators of embryogenesis. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 136149 (2011)
  6. Wan, D. et al. Large-scale cDNA transfection screening for genes related to cancer development and progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1572415729 (2004)
  7. Sen, G. L., Reuter, J. A., Webster, D. E., Zhu, L. & Khavari, P. A. DNMT1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue. Nature 463, 563567 (2010)
  8. Truong, A. B., Kretz, M., Ridky, T. W., Kimmel, R. & Khavari, P. A. p63 regulates proliferation and differentiation of developmentally mature keratinocytes. Genes Dev. 20, 31853197 (2006)
  9. O’Driscoll, J. et al. A recurrent mutation in the loricrin gene underlies the ichthyotic variant of Vohwinkel syndrome. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 27, 243246 (2002)
  10. Smith, F. J. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin cause ichthyosis vulgaris. Nature Genet. 38, 337–342 (2006)
  11. Virtanen, M., Smith, S. K., Gedde-Dahl, T., Jr, Vahlquist, A. & Bowden, P. E. Splice site and deletion mutations in keratin (KRT1 and KRT10) genes: unusual phenotypic alterations in Scandinavian patients with epidermolytic hyperkeratosis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 121, 10131020 (2003)
  12. Elias, P. M. Stratum corneum defensive functions: an integrated view. J. Invest. Dermatol. 125, 183200 (2005)
  13. Eckl, K. M. et al. Molecular analysis of 250 patients with autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis: evidence for mutation hotspots in ALOXE3 and allelic heterogeneity in ALOX12B. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 14211428 (2009)
  14. Sakai, K. et al. ABCA12 is a major causative gene for non-bullous congenital ichthyosiform erythroderma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 23062309 (2009)
  15. Westerberg, R. et al. Role for ELOVL3 and fatty acid chain length in development of hair and skin function. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 56215629 (2004)
  16. Denecker, G. et al. Caspase-14 protects against epidermal UVB photodamage and water loss. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 666674 (2007)
  17. Raj, A., van den Bogaard, P., Rifkin, S. A., van Oudenaarden, A. & Tyagi, S. Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nature Methods 5, 877879 (2008)
  18. Chu, C., Qu, K., Zhong, F. L., Artandi, S. E. & Chang, H. Y. Genomic maps of long noncoding RNA occupancy reveal principles of RNA-chromatin interactions. Mol. Cell 44, 667678 (2011)
  19. Huarte, M. et al. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142, 409419 (2010)
  20. Nagano, T. et al. The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science 322, 17171720 (2008)
  21. Tsai, M. C. et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science 329, 689693 (2010)
  22. Dugré-Brisson, S. et al. Interaction of Staufen1 with the 5′ end of mRNA facilitates translation of these RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 47974812 (2005)
  23. Gong, C. & Maquat, L. E. lncRNAs transactivate STAU1-mediated mRNA decay by duplexing with 3′ UTRs via Alu elements. Nature 470, 284288 (2011)
  24. Kiebler, M. A. et al. The mammalian staufen protein localizes to the somatodendritic domain of cultured hippocampal neurons: implications for its involvement in mRNA transport. J. Neurosci. 19, 288297 (1999)
  25. St Johnston, D., Beuchle, D. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. Staufen, a gene required to localize maternal RNAs in the Drosophila egg. Cell 66, 5163 (1991)
  26. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1554515550 (2005)
  27. Furic, L., Maher-Laporte, M. & DesGroseillers, L. A genome-wide approach identifies distinct but overlapping subsets of cellular mRNAs associated with Staufen1- and Staufen2-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes. RNA 14, 324335 (2008)
  28. Merino, E. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Coughlan, J. L. & Weeks, K. M. RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 42234231 (2005)
  29. Bond, A. M. et al. Balanced gene regulation by an embryonic brain ncRNA is critical for adult hippocampal GABA circuitry. Nature Neurosci. 12, 10201027 (2009)
  30. Young, T. L., Matsuda, T. & Cepko, C. L. The noncoding RNA Taurine Upregulated Gene 1 is required for differentiation of the murine retina. Curr. Biol. 15, 501512 (2005)
  31. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 11051111 (2009)
  32. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841842 (2010)
  33. Bailey, T. L. et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202W208 (2009)
  34. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols 4, 4457 (2009)
  35. Das, R., Laederach, A., Pearlman, S. M., Herschlag, D. & Altman, R. B. SAFA: semi-automated footprinting analysis software for high-throughput quantification of nucleic acid footprinting experiments. RNA 11, 344354 (2005)
  36. Deigan, K. E., Li, T. W., Mathews, D. H. & Weeks, K. M. Accurate SHAPE-directed RNA structure determination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 97102 (2009)
  37. Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 34063415 (2003)

Download references

Author information

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • Zurab Siprashvili,
    • Ci Chu &
    • Dan E. Webster

Affiliations

  1. The Program in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • Markus Kretz,
    • Zurab Siprashvili,
    • Ci Chu,
    • Dan E. Webster,
    • Ashley Zehnder,
    • Kun Qu,
    • Carolyn S. Lee,
    • Ross J. Flockhart,
    • Abigail F. Groff,
    • Jennifer Chow,
    • Danielle Johnston,
    • Grace E. Kim,
    • Robert C. Spitale,
    • Ryan A. Flynn,
    • Grace X. Y. Zheng,
    • Howard Y. Chang &
    • Paul A. Khavari
  2. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

    • Subhadra Aiyer &
    • Arjun Raj
  3. Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    • John L. Rinn
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • Howard Y. Chang
  5. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California 94304, USA

    • Paul A. Khavari

Contributions

M.K. designed and executed experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript. D.E.W., Z.S., C.C., A.Z., C.S.L., R.J.F., K.Q., J.C., D.J., G.X.Y.Z., G.E.K., A.F.G., R.C.S., R.A.F. and S.A. executed experiments, analysed data and contributed to design of experimentation. A.R. and J.L.R. helped design experiments and analysed data. P.A.K. and H.Y.C. designed experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to:

Sequence and array data are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under the accession number GSE35468.

Author details

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. Supplementary Information (966K)

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-7 and Supplementary Tables 1-8.

Additional data