Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries

Abstract

One billion people depend on seafood as their primary source of protein and 25% of the world’s total animal protein comes from fisheries1. Yet a third of fish stocks worldwide are overexploited or depleted1,2. Using individual case studies, many have argued that community-based co-management3 should prevent the tragedy of the commons4 because cooperative management by fishers, managers and scientists often results in sustainable fisheries3,5,6. However, general and multidisciplinary evaluations of co-management regimes and the conditions for social, economic and ecological success within such regimes are lacking. Here we examine 130 co-managed fisheries in a wide range of countries with different degrees of development, ecosystems, fishing sectors and type of resources. We identified strong leadership as the most important attribute contributing to success, followed by individual or community quotas, social cohesion and protected areas. Less important conditions included enforcement mechanisms, long-term management policies and life history of the resources. Fisheries were most successful when at least eight co-management attributes were present, showing a strong positive relationship between the number of these attributes and success, owing to redundancy in management regulations. Our results demonstrate the critical importance of prominent community leaders and robust social capital7, combined with clear incentives through catch shares and conservation benefits derived from protected areas, for successfully managing aquatic resources and securing the livelihoods of communities depending on them. Our study offers hope that co-management, the only realistic solution for the majority of the world’s fisheries, can solve many of the problems facing global fisheries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Location and success score for all study cases of fisheries co-management.
Figure 2: Fisheries co-management performance.
Figure 3: Key co-management attributes for fisheries success.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Yearbook: Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2007 (FAO, 2009)

  2. Worm, B. et al. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325, 578–585 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Costanza, R. et al. Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science 281, 198–199 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907–1912 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pretty, J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302, 1912–1914 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beddington, J. R., Agnew, D. J. & Clark, C. W. Current problems in the management of marine fisheries. Science 316, 1713–1716 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkes, F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15188–15193 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pomeroy, R. S. & Williams, M. J. Fisheries Co-Management and Small-Scale Fisheries: A Policy Brief (ICLARM, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M. T., Kothari, A. & Renard, Y. Sharing Power: Learning by Doing in Co-Management of Natural Resources Throughout the World (IIED and IUCN/CEESP/CMWG, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Defeo, O. & Castilla, J. C. More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheries. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 15, 265–283 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, J., Yan, L. & Wilson, C. The precursors of governance in the Maine lobster fishery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15212–15217 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Basurto, X. & Ostrom, E. The core challenges of moving beyond Garrett Hardin. J. Nat. Resour. Pol. Res. 1, 255–259 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations Development Programme. The Human Development Index (UNDP, 2009)

  16. Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilborn, R. Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Mar. Policy 31, 153–158 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chetty, R. K. et al. A systematic approach to preclinical and clinical safety biomarker qualification incorporating Bradford Hill’s principles of causality association. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 88, 260–262 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Castilla, J. C. & Defeo, O. Paradigm shifts needed for world fisheries. Science 309, 1324–1325 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefansson, G. & Rosenberg, A. A. Combining control measures for more effective management of fisheries under uncertainty: quotas, effort limitation and protected areas. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 133–146 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hilborn, R. Managing fisheries is managing people: what has been learned? Fish Fish. 8, 285–296 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Hahn, T. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecol. Soc. 9, 2 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sigmund, K., De Silva, H., Traulsen, A. & Hauert, C. Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons. Nature 466, 861–863 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Berkes, F. Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ. Manage. 34, 75–90 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costello, C., Gaines, S. D. & Lynham, J. Can catch shares prevent fisheries collapse? Science 321, 1678–1681 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Essington, T. E. Ecological indicators display reduced variation in North American catch share fisheries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 754–759 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Branch, T. A. How do individual transferable quotas affect marine ecosystems? Fish Fish. 10, 39–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollnac, R. et al. Marine reserves as linked social–ecological systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (2010)

  30. Levin, S. Crossing scales, crossing disciplines: collective motion and collective action in the Global Commons. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 13–18 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.L.G. was partially funded by the National Science Foundation (award 0308440) and a Fulbright–OAS Initiative in Ecology fellowship. O.D. acknowledges support by the Pew Charitable Trusts. We thank E. Ostrom, T. A. Branch, and X. Basurto for comments on the manuscript and A. E. Punt, W. N. Venables, R. Perera and S. Sethi for discussions on the methodological and statistical approach.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.L.G. designed the study, compiled and analysed the data and performed the statistical analyses; O.D. compiled and analysed the data. All authors discussed the results and jointly wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolás L. Gutiérrez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary References, Supplementary Tables 1-6 and Supplementary Figures 1-7 with legends. (PDF 1247 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gutiérrez, N., Hilborn, R. & Defeo, O. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470, 386–389 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing