An independent thinker, willing to say what he thought

Journal name:
Date published:
Published online

We object to the inaccurate and misleading characterization of William Nierenberg by Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway (Nature 465, 686687; 2010). Their claim that the peer-review panel chaired by Nierenberg “played down the severity of acid rain” is a contradiction of the panel report itself (see W. A. Nierenberg, chairman, Report of the Acid Rain Peer Review Panel; White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1984).

Commenting on an interim version of this report, The New York Times wrote on 27 June 1983 that it “concludes that action should be taken immediately to curb acid rain ... It is the first recommendation by an official Government panel calling for action and not just more study to deal with acid rain, according to William A. Nierenberg.”

Nierenberg, who died in September 2000, was an independent thinker who was always willing to say what he thought, regardless of what was popular or expected. He knew that building public support for science begins with a constant regard for the truth.

Author information


  1. Nierenberg Foundation, 9494 La Jolla Farms Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA

    • Nicolas Nierenberg
  2. Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4370, USA

    • Walter R. Tschinkel
  3. 1561 Marion Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32314-5948, USA

    • Victoria J. Tschinkel

Author details


  1. Report this comment #12152

    Nicolas Nierenberg said:

    We note that this was not an isolated incident. The Times On Line had to correct a story written by Naomi Oreskes about Nierenberg . And just recently the BBC issued a correction to a program segment about Nierenberg that was based on information from Oreskes . In addition our recently published peer reviewed paper demonstrates numerous issues with Oreskes earlier paper on Nierenberg. (Early Climate Change Consensus at the National Academy: The Origins and Making of Changing Climate Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Vol. 40, Number 3, pps. 318?349). Despite having been notified of these errors Oreskes repeated them in chapter 6 of her book Merchants of Doubt.

Subscribe to comments

Additional data