Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers

Nature volume 466, pages 490–493 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Genes include cis-regulatory regions that contain transcriptional enhancers. Recent reports have shown that developmental genes often possess multiple discrete enhancer modules that drive transcription in similar spatio-temporal patterns1,2,3,4: primary enhancers located near the basal promoter and secondary, or ‘shadow’, enhancers located at more remote positions. It has been proposed that the seemingly redundant activity of primary and secondary enhancers contributes to phenotypic robustness1,5. We tested this hypothesis by generating a deficiency that removes two newly discovered enhancers of shavenbaby (svb, a transcript of the ovo locus), a gene encoding a transcription factor that directs development of Drosophila larval trichomes6. At optimal temperatures for embryonic development, this deficiency causes minor defects in trichome patterning. In embryos that develop at both low and high extreme temperatures, however, absence of these secondary enhancers leads to extensive loss of trichomes. These temperature-dependent defects can be rescued by a transgene carrying a secondary enhancer driving transcription of the svb cDNA. Finally, removal of one copy of wingless, a gene required for normal trichome patterning7, causes a similar loss of trichomes only in flies lacking the secondary enhancers. These results support the hypothesis that secondary enhancers contribute to phenotypic robustness in the face of environmental and genetic variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The svb cis -regulatory region in D. melanogaster.
Figure 2: Effect of Df(X)svb 108 on the number of quaternary trichomes.
Figure 3: Rescue of the temperature-dependent trichome loss in the lateral patch by a Z::svb transgene.
Figure 4: Effect of Df(X)svb108 ; wg−/+ on the number of quaternary trichomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hong, J. W., Hendrix, D. A. & Levine, M. S. Shadow enhancers as a source of evolutionary novelty. Science 321, 1314 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Werner, T., Hammer, A., Wahlbuhl, M., Bosl, M. R. & Wegner, M. Multiple conserved regulatory elements with overlapping functions determine Sox10 expression in mouse embryogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 6526–6538 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zeitlinger, J. et al. Whole-genome ChIP-chip analysis of Dorsal, Twist, and Snail suggests integration of diverse patterning processes in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21, 385–390 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeong, Y., El-Jaick, K., Roessler, E., Muenke, M. & Epstein, D. J. A functional screen for sonic hedgehog regulatory elements across a 1 Mb interval identifies long-range ventral forebrain enhancers. Development 133, 761–772 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perry, M. W., Cande, J. D., Boettiger, A. N. & Levine, M. Evolution of insect dorsoventral patterning mechanisms. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. advance online publication, 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.021 (20 October 2009)

  6. Payre, F., Vincent, A. & Carreno, S. ovo/svb integrates Wingless and DER pathways to control epidermis differentiation. Nature 400, 271–275 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bokor, P. & DiNardo, S. The roles of hedgehog, wingless and lines in patterning the dorsal epidermis in Drosophila . Development 122, 1083–1092 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Overton, P. M., Chia, W. & Buescher, M. The Drosophila HMG-domain proteins SoxNeuro and Dichaete direct trichome formation via the activation of shavenbaby and the restriction of Wingless pathway activity. Development 134, 2807–2813 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chanut-Delalande, H., Fernandes, I., Roch, F., Payre, F. & Plaza, S. Shavenbaby couples patterning to epidermal cell shape control. PLoS Biol. 4, e290 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandes, I. et al. Zona pellucida domain proteins remodel the apical compartment for localized cell shape changes. Dev. Cell 18, 64–76 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGregor, A. P. et al. Morphological evolution through multiple cis-regulatory mutations at a single gene. Nature 448, 587–590 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sucena, E., Delon, I., Jones, I., Payre, F. & Stern, D. L. Regulatory evolution of shavenbaby/ovo underlies multiple cases of morphological parallelism. Nature 424, 935–938 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Crane-Robinson, C., Dragan, A. I. & Read, C. M. Defining the thermodynamics of protein/DNA complexes and their components using micro-calorimetry. Methods Mol. Biol. 543, 625–651 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochachka, P. W. & Somero, G. N. Biochemical Adaptation: Mechanism and Process in Physiological Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Powsner, L. The effects of temperature on the durations of the developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster . Physiol. Zool. 8, 474–520 (1935)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Delon, I., Chanut-Delalande, H. & Payre, F. The Ovo/Shavenbaby transcription factor specifies actin remodelling during epidermal differentiation in Drosophila . Mech. Dev. 120, 747–758 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nijhout, H. F. & Davidowitz, G. in Developmental Instability: Causes and Consequences (ed. M. Polak) Ch. 1 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boettiger, A. N. & Levine, M. Synchronous and stochastic patterns of gene activation in the Drosophila embryo. Science 325, 471–473 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cretekos, C. J. et al. Regulatory divergence modifies limb length between mammals. Genes Dev. 22, 141–151 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiong, N., Kang, C. & Raulet, D. H. Redundant and unique roles of two enhancer elements in the TCRγ locus in gene regulation and γδ T cell development. Immunity 16, 453–463 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, X., Cassidy, J. J., Reinke, C. A., Fischboeck, S. & Carthew, R. W. A microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation during development. Cell 137, 273–282 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Crickmore, M. A., Ranade, V. & Mann, R. S. Regulation of Ubx expression by epigenetic enhancer silencing in response to Ubx levels and genetic variation. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000633 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raser, J. M. & O’Shea, E. K. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309, 2010–2013 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. van den Heuvel, M., Harryman-Samos, C., Klingensmith, J., Perrimon, N. & Nusse, R. Mutations in the segment polarity genes wingless and porcupine impair secretion of the wingless protein. EMBO J. 12, 5293–5302 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bischof, J., Maeda, R. K., Hediger, M., Karch, F. & Basler, K. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3312–3317 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Parks, A. L. et al. Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nature Genet. 36, 288–292 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Chien and D. Erezyilmaz for assistance with early experiments, L. Kruglyak, S. Levin and S. Tavazoie for helpful comments on the manuscript, and E. Wieschaus for providing the wg mutant flies. This work was supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts Latin American Fellows Program in the Biomedical Sciences Fellowship to N.F., Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Blanc 2008, Netoshape) to F.P., and NIH (GM063622-06A1) and NSF (IOS-0640339) grants to D.L.S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA,

    Nicolás Frankel, Diego Vargas, Shu Wang & David L. Stern

  2. Department of Biology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N. Merion Ave, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, USA,

    Gregory K. Davis

  3. Université de Toulouse and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Biologie du Développement, UMR5547, Toulouse, F-31062, France ,

    François Payre

Authors
  1. Nicolás Frankel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory K. Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diego Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. François Payre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. David L. Stern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.F., G.K.D. and D.L.S. designed the experiments. N.F., G.K.D., D.V., S.W., F.P. and D.L.S. performed the experimental work. N.F. and D.L.S. wrote the manuscript. G.K.D. and F.P. commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Stern.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-3 with legends. (PDF 2343 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankel, N., Davis, G., Vargas, D. et al. Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466, 490–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09158

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09158

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research