Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The role of mentorship in protégé performance

Nature volume 465, pages 622–626 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The role of mentorship in protégé performance is a matter of importance to academic, business and governmental organizations. Although the benefits of mentorship for protégés, mentors and their organizations are apparent1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, the extent to which protégés mimic their mentors’ career choices and acquire their mentorship skills is unclear10,11,12,13,14,15,16. The importance of a science, technology, engineering and mathematics workforce to economic growth and the role of effective mentorship in maintaining a ‘healthy’ such workforce demand the study of the role of mentorship in academia. Here we investigate one aspect of mentor emulation by studying mentorship fecundity—the number of protégés a mentor trains—using data from the Mathematics Genealogy Project17, which tracks the mentorship record of thousands of mathematicians over several centuries. We demonstrate that fecundity among academic mathematicians is correlated with other measures of academic success. We also find that the average fecundity of mentors remains stable over 60 years of recorded mentorship. We further discover three significant correlations in mentorship fecundity. First, mentors with low mentorship fecundities train protégés that go on to have mentorship fecundities 37% higher than expected. Second, in the first third of their careers, mentors with high fecundities train protégés that go on to have fecundities 29% higher than expected. Finally, in the last third of their careers, mentors with high fecundities train protégés that go on to have fecundities 31% lower than expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Relationship between mentorship fecundity and other performance metrics.
Figure 2: Evolution of the fecundity distribution.
Figure 3: Branching process null models.
Figure 4: Effect of age difference between mentor and protégé, t c  −  t p , on protégé fecundity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kram, K. E. Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life (Scott Foresman, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M. & Gardner, P. D. Formal and informal mentorships: a comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Person. Psychol. 45, 619–635 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scandura, T. A. Mentorship and career mobility: an empirical investigation. J. Organ. Behav. 13, 169–174 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aryee, S., Chay, Y. W. & Chew, J. The motivation to mentor among managerial employees. Group Organ. Manage. 21, 261–277 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L., Russell, J. E. A. & Dobbins, G. H. A field study of factors related to supervisors’ willingness to mentor others. J. Vocat. Behav. 50, 1–22 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donaldson, S. I., Ensher, E. A. & Grant-Vallone, E. J. Longitudinal examination of mentoring relationships on organizational commitment and citizenship behavior. J. Career Dev. 26, 233–249 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Payne, S. C. & Huffman, A. H. A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover. Acad. Manage. J. 48, 158–168 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kram, K. E. & Isabella, L. A. Mentoring alternatives: the role of peer relationships in cancer development. Acad. Manage. J. 28, 110–132 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins, M. C. & Kram, K. E. Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 26, 264–283 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L. & Burroughs, S. M. The mentor’s perspective: a qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. J. Vocat. Behav. 51, 70–89 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, S. G. & Bauer, T. N. Supervisory mentoring by advisers: relationships with doctoral student potential, productivity, and commitment. Person. Psychol. 48, 537–562 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, R., Ragins, B. R. & Tharenou, P. Who gets a mentor? A longitudinal assessment of the rising star hypothesis. J. Vocat. Behav. 74, 11–17 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen, T. D., Poteet, M. L. & Russell, J. E. A. Protégé selection by mentors: what makes the difference? J. Organ. Behav. 21, 271–282 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allen, T. D. Protégé selection by mentors: contributing individual and organizational factors. J. Vocat. Behav. 65, 469–483 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragins, B. R. & Scandura, T. A. Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J. Organ. Behav. 20, 493–509 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G. & Bauer, T. N. Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Res. High. Ed. 47, 451–476 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. North. Dakota State University. The Mathematics Genealogy Project 〈http://genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu〉 (accessed, November 2007)

  18. Bourne, P. E. & Fink, J. L. I am not a scientist, I am a number. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000247 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Enserink, M. Are you ready to become a number? Science 323, 1662–1664 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. King, J. A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J. Inf. Sci. 13, 261–276 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moed, H. F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (Springer, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hirsch, J. E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Athreya, K. B. & Ney, P. E. Branching Processes (Courier Dover, 2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Milo, R., Kashtan, N., Itzkovitz, S., Newman, M. E. J. & Alon, U. On the uniform generation of random graphs with prescribed degree sequences. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0312028〉 (2004)

  26. Itzkovitz, S., Milo, R., Kashtan, N., Newman, M. E. J. & Alon, U. Reply to “Comment on ‘Subgraphs in random networks’”. Phys. Rev. E 70, 058102 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hardy, G. H. A Mathematician’s Apology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1940)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Stauffer, D. & Aharony, A. Introduction to Percolation Theory 2nd edn (Taylor & Francis, 1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Chapman, B. & Chang, J. Biopython: python tools for computational biology. ACM SIGBIO Newslett. 20, 15–19 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D’Agostino, R. B. & Stephens, M. A. Goodness-of-Fit Techniques (Dekker, 1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Guimerà, P. McMullen, A. Pah, M. Sales-Pardo, E. N. Sawardecker, D. B. Stouffer and M. J. Stringer for comments and suggestions. L.A.N.A. gratefully acknowledges the support of US National Science Foundation awards SBE 0830388 and IIS 0838564. All figures were generated using PYGRACE (http://pygrace.sourceforge.net) with colour schemes from ColorBrewer 2.0 (http://colorbrewer.org).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA,

    R. Dean Malmgren, Julio M. Ottino & Luís A. Nunes Amaral

  2. Datascope Analytics, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA ,

    R. Dean Malmgren

  3. Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA ,

    Julio M. Ottino & Luís A. Nunes Amaral

  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA ,

    Luís A. Nunes Amaral

Authors
  1. R. Dean Malmgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julio M. Ottino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luís A. Nunes Amaral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.D.M. analyzed data, designed the study and wrote the paper. J.M.O. and L.A.N.A. designed the study and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Julio M. Ottino or Luís A. Nunes Amaral.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-4 with legends and a Supplementary Discussion. (PDF 527 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malmgren, R., Ottino, J. & Nunes Amaral, L. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature 465, 622–626 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09040

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing