Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair

Abstract

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination is crucial for cell proliferation and tumour suppression. However, despite its importance, the molecular intermediates of mitotic DSB repair remain undefined. The double Holliday junction (DHJ), presupposed to be the central intermediate for more than 25 years1, has only been identified during meiotic recombination2. Moreover, evidence has accumulated for alternative, DHJ-independent mechanisms3,4,5,6, raising the possibility that DHJs are not formed during DSB repair in mitotically cycling cells. Here we identify intermediates of DSB repair by using a budding-yeast assay system designed to mimic physiological DSB repair. This system uses diploid cells and provides the possibility for allelic recombination either between sister chromatids or between homologues, as well as direct comparison with meiotic recombination at the same locus. In mitotically cycling cells, we detect inter-homologue joint molecule (JM) intermediates whose strand composition and size are identical to those of the canonical DHJ structures observed in meiosis2. However, in contrast to meiosis, JMs between sister chromatids form in preference to those between homologues. Moreover, JMs seem to represent a minor pathway of DSB repair in mitotic cells, being detected at about tenfold lower levels (per DSB) than during meiotic recombination. Thus, although DHJs are identified as intermediates of DSB-promoted recombination in both mitotic and meiotic cells, their formation is distinctly regulated according to the specific dictates of the two cellular programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inducible DSB repair system.
Figure 2: Detection of JMs during DSB repair.
Figure 3: Analysis of JM composition.
Figure 4: Temporal analysis of JMs in wild-type and sgs1 cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Szostak, J. W., Orr-Weaver, T. L., Rothstein, R. J. & Stahl, F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33, 25–35 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwacha, A. & Kleckner, N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83, 783–791 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Resnick, M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J. Theor. Biol. 59, 97–106 (1976)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nassif, N., Penney, J., Pal, S., Engels, W. R. & Gloor, G. B. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1613–1625 (1994)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McMahill, M. S., Sham, C. W. & Bishop, D. K. Synthesis-dependent strand annealing in meiosis. PLoS Biol. 5, e299 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heyer, W. D., Ehmsen, K. T. & Solinger, J. A. Holliday junctions in the eukaryotic nucleus: resolution in sight? Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 548–557 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter, N. & Kleckner, N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106, 59–70 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haber, J. E. Uses and abuses of HO endonuclease. Methods Enzymol. 350, 141–164 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Monteilhet, C., Perrin, A., Thierry, A., Colleaux, L. & Dujon, B. Purification and characterization of the in vitro activity of I-Sce I, a novel and highly specific endonuclease encoded by a group I intron. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 1407–1413 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galli, A. & Schiestl, R. H. Effects of DNA double-strand and single-strand breaks on intrachromosomal recombination events in cell-cycle-arrested yeast cells. Genetics 149, 1235–1250 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh, S. D. et al. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130, 259–272 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bell, L. & Byers, B. Separation of branched from linear DNA by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 130, 527–535 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cromie, G. A. et al. Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell 127, 1167–1178 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roman, H. & Fabre, F. Gene conversion and associated reciprocal recombination are separable events in vegetative cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 6912–6916 (1983)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, P. S. et al. A fine-structure map of spontaneous mitotic crossovers in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . PLoS Genet. 5, e1000410 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ira, G. et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431, 1011–1017 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aylon, Y., Liefshitz, B. & Kupiec, M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23, 4868–4875 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sjogren, C. & Nasmyth, K. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Curr. Biol. 11, 991–995 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fabre, F., Boulet, A. & Roman, H. Gene conversion at different points in the mitotic cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol. Gen. Genet. 195, 139–143 (1984)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kadyk, L. C. & Hartwell, L. H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genetics 132, 387–402 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, R. D. & Jasin, M. Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 29, 196–201 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Borner, G. V., Kleckner, N. & Hunter, N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117, 29–45 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jessop, L., Allers, T. & Lichten, M. Infrequent co-conversion of markers flanking a meiotic recombination initiation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genetics 169, 1353–1367 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Y. & West, S. C. More complexity to the Bloom's syndrome complex. Genes Dev. 22, 2737–2742 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunter, N. in Molecular Genetics of Recombination (eds Aguilera, A. & Rothstein, R.) 381–442 (Springer, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mullen, J. R., Kaliraman, V. & Brill, S. J. Bipartite structure of the SGS1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Genetics 154, 1101–1114 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, L. & Hickson, I. D. The Bloom’s syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426, 870–874 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, L. et al. The HRDC domain of BLM is required for the dissolution of double Holliday junctions. EMBO J. 24, 2679–2687 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shinohara, A., Ogawa, H. & Ogawa, T. Rad51 protein involved in repair and recombination in S. cerevisiae is a RecA-like protein. Cell 69, 457–470 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oh, S. D., Jessop, L., Lao, J. P., Lichten, M. J. & Hunter, N. H. in Methods in Molecular Biology, Meiosis: Molecular and Genetic Methods (ed. Keeney, S.) 209–234 (Humana, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Schiestl for plasmid pWY203, and W. Heyer for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of General Medical Sciences grants GM025326 to N.K. and GM074223 to N.H.

Author Contributions M.B. performed the experiments, assisted by S.D.O. and N.T. M.B., N.K. and N.H. designed the experiments, discussed the results and prepared the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Hunter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S7 with legends, Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary References. (PDF 1823 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bzymek, M., Thayer, N., Oh, S. et al. Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 464, 937–941 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08868

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08868

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing