Books and Arts

Nature 461, 596 (1 October 2009) | doi:10.1038/461596a; Published online 30 September 2009

Showcasing the evidence for evolution

Laurence D. Hurst1


Laurence D. Hurst compares two seasoned authors' strategies for explaining the difference between evolution fact and fantasy — Richard Dawkins's thunder and Carl Zimmer's poise.

BOOK REVIEWEDThe Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

by Richard Dawkins

Free Press/Bantam Press: 2009. 480 pp/406 pp. $30/£20

BOOK REVIEWEDThe Tangled Bank: An Introduction to Evolution

by Carl Zimmer

Roberts: 2009. 394 pp. $59.95/£29.99

Showcasing the evidence for evolution


Richard Dawkins's latest work is about more than just the theory.

I am usually reluctant to claim anything to be a 'fact'. Likewise, I shy away from the word 'proof' beyond the certainties of mathematics. But, as Richard Dawkins makes plain in The Greatest Show on Earth, cautious scientists like me should get off the fence. Our enterprise has established facts and we should have the confidence to say so. Evolution is one such fact, and the evidence for it is laid out in two new books by Dawkins and Carl Zimmer.

The Greatest Show on Earth is Dawkins on top form: unambiguous, beautifully argued, with prose flowing like quicksilver. He starts, as Charles Darwin did in On the Origin of Species, by coaxing the reader down a logical path, from artificial selection and domestication, through the ubiquity of the heritability of traits, to the inevitability of evolution by natural selection. Unlike many of his previous books, the logic of evolution plays second fiddle to the evidence for it and how that evidence is obtained. He explains what we have learnt from studying the relatedness between species (phylogenetics) and the way organisms develop (embryology), from the fossil record (palaeontology) and from the geographical distribution of species (biogeography). He is especially good on the unintelligent design of organisms.

As Dawkins makes clear, evolution is testable and has survived every test. Sometimes we need, he says, to be a detective, uncovering the incriminating evidence of an unseen event. We can also, through genetics and through experimental evolution in the laboratory and field, witness evolution directly and in real-time. Darwin surely would have been thrilled to read of in vitro evolution of new complex traits, such as citrate metabolism in bacteria.

The Greatest Show on Earth is not just about the facts. Dawkins asserts that his book is not anti-religious, although he hardly hides his opinions. He never wastes an opportunity to knock what he sees in creationists as intellectually corrupt. Some will criticize him for being uncompromising, but I applaud him for taking such a categorical — and entertaining — stance. Dawkins emerges like a prize-fighter, knocking out of the ring all objections.

Carl Zimmer's approach to explaining evolution in The Tangled Bank is rather different. In a non-confrontational way, he lays out the evidence for all to see. His prose, while authoritative and easy to read, is poised rather than animated. Dense with facts, the book is billed as the first textbook on evolution for the general reader, and in that framework it excels. Zimmer doesn't counterpoint the facts of evolution with creationist assertions but biblical literalism stalks the pages like the elephant in the room.

By necessity both authors cut corners. Both, for example, fail to explain why proteins accumulate changes at a steady rate regardless of an organism's lifespan, by using the same simplified explanation that predicts more rapid changes in short-lived species. While arguing that changes can accumulate in genomes by chance and irrespective of selection, Dawkins argues that 95% of our genome is effectively useless. This ignores unexpected recent findings that the majority of our genome is active making RNA transcripts, even though only a few of these go on to specify proteins.

A greater weakness is that neither book offers much perspective on unanswered questions. A reader could be forgiven for thinking that evolutionary biologists today are doing little more than dotting the proverbial 'i's. Although the fact of evolution is beyond doubt, the recent explosion of genetic sequence data means that the skills of evolutionists are needed now more than ever.

So which is the better strategy for explaining the difference between fact and fantasy: that of the quiet American or that of the British Rottweiler? Zimmer makes the facts palatable but Dawkins reminds us that some people persist in their beliefs even if they are profoundly contradicted by observation and logic. He relates his interview with a creationist who, when asked whether she had seen hominid skulls in the museum, asserts that such skulls simply do not exist. Such blithe disrespect for scientific evidence and for historical fact should concern us all.

  1. Laurence D. Hurst is a professor of evolutionary genetics at the University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.


These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

Readers' Comments

If you find something abusive or inappropriate or which does not otherwise comply with our Terms and Conditions or Community Guidelines, please select the relevant 'Report this comment' link.

There are currently no comments.

Add your own comment

This is a public forum. Please keep to our Community Guidelines. You can be controversial, but please don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Remember our threads are for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers, press releases or advertisements.

You need to be registered with Nature and agree to our Community Guidelines to leave a comment. Please log in or register as a new user. You will be re-directed back to this page.