Books and Arts

Nature 460, 461 (23 July 2009) | doi:10.1038/460461a; Published online 22 July 2009

Digesting evolution

Randolph M. Nesse1

BOOK REVIEWEDThe Evolution of Obesity

by Michael L. Power and & Jay Schulkin

Johns Hopkins University Press: 2009. 408 pp. $40, £21

The Evolution of Obesity is a fusion cuisine that brings together proximate explanations of weight-regulation mechanisms and the evolutionary reasons for why these can fail. The result is a rich meal that is memorable, if slightly hard to digest. The book is one of the first to use an evolutionary framework to analyse a major body of neuroendocrine knowledge about a specific condition.

By considering the adaptive functions of the physiological mechanisms of weight regulation, Michael Power and Jay Schulkin construct this framework to try to make sense of a huge amount of disconnected knowledge. They are in the vanguard of those who recognize a disturbing fundamental principle: natural selection shapes systems that are nearly indescribably complex. After millions of years of selection and genetic drift, the mechanisms responsible for a particular biological function are so intertwined and multifunctional that no simple description can be accurate.

Attributing one function to a hormone is attractive, but often wrong. For example, the strong correlation of leptin levels with body-fat mass seems to suggest that leptin exists mainly to limit body weight. But its role is not so clear: administering it to people who are obese does not reduce appetite or weight. Low leptin levels signal the need to seek food, but leptin is only one part of the complex system that regulates eating. Power and Schulkin provide the real story: leptin's functions depend "on the tissue, the state of the organism, especially the expression of other information molecules such as insulin, glucocorticoids, and CRH, and also on the age of the organism. Leptin has many functions, which change with time, tissue, and circumstances."

Attributing one function to a hormone is attractive, but often wrong.

The authors come to similar conclusions for dozens of information molecules that are involved in feeding regulation — including the hormones ghrelin, corticotropin-releasing hormone and cholecystokinin. Although their conclusion about the complexity of systems shaped by selection will distress readers who want a simple story, it is profound beyond the realm of weight regulation. Power and Schulkin argue that a full understanding will come only from "integrating the reductionist methodology into a more all-inclusive approach".

The book covers nearly all the main issues in obesity research. Geneticist James Neel's theory of the 'thrifty genotype' — shaped to store fat to cope with food scarcity — receives a full critique. Similarly detailed is the authors' treatment of new suggestions that thrifty phenotypes might be induced in developing embryos whose calorie intake is limited. They discuss adipose tissue, where fat is stored, as an endocrine organ that secretes at least ten information molecules, and describe the role of cytokines as mediators of the tissue damage associated with abdominal obesity.

The epidemiology of the recent obesity epidemic — manifesting as a threefold increase in obesity in the United States in just 50 years — is covered well. In an insightful section, Power and Schulkin ask why humans eat meals instead of feeding continuously. They eruditely connect explanations from behavioural ecology with the brain mechanisms responsible and with the social functions of sharing meals. Changes in diet since the Palaeolithic era are reviewed carefully, as are the interactions between meat eating and brain evolution.

Most books on obesity are heavy on opinion and light on facts. The Evolution of Obesity is the reverse. I wanted to hear the authors' considered views on the relative contributions of fructose-based beverages, exercise and other factors to the obesity epidemic. They might also have discussed in more depth how mechanisms that limit body weight are shaped by selection forces. The authors mention the increased rates of predation for heavy, slow individuals, but they do not analyse other trade-offs, such as the risks associated with increased foraging time, the caloric costs of maintaining extra weight or the costs of those calories not being available to kin.

The ingredients in The Evolution of Obesity are somewhat unbalanced, favouring proximate over evolutionary causes. Yet the book goes far beyond anything else that is available on obesity. Power and Schulkin deserve much credit for their bold attempt to combine evolutionary and reductionist explanations, and for their unflinching acknowledgement of complexity.

  1. Randolph M. Nesse is professor of psychiatry and of psychology at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1043, USA.
    Email: nesse@umich.edu


Readers' Comments

If you find something abusive or inappropriate or which does not otherwise comply with our Terms and Conditions or Community Guidelines, please select the relevant 'Report this comment' link.

There are currently no comments.

Add your own comment

This is a public forum. Please keep to our Community Guidelines. You can be controversial, but please don't get personal or offensive and do keep it brief. Remember our threads are for feedback and discussion - not for publishing papers, press releases or advertisements.

You need to be registered with Nature and agree to our Community Guidelines to leave a comment. Please log in or register as a new user. You will be re-directed back to this page.