Access

Letter

Nature 459, 842-846 (11 June 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature08000; Received 17 December 2008; Accepted 18 March 2009; Published online 6 May 2009

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

  • Director

    • The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM)
    • Bethesda, MD
  • Medical Writer

    • Cactus Global
    • Mumbai 400053 India

Specificity of sensory–motor connections encoded by Sema3e–Plxnd1 recognition

Eline Pecho-Vrieseling1, Markus Sigrist1, Yutaka Yoshida2,3, Thomas M. Jessell2 & Silvia Arber1

  1. Biozentrum, Department of Cell Biology, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland, and Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Departments of Neuroscience and Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, USA
  3. Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA

Correspondence to: Thomas M. Jessell2Silvia Arber1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.A. (Email: silvia.arber@unibas.ch) or T.M.J. (Email: tmj1@columbia.edu).

Top

Spinal reflexes are mediated by synaptic connections between sensory afferents and motor neurons1, 2, 3. The organization of these circuits shows several levels of specificity. Only certain classes of proprioceptive sensory neurons make direct, monosynaptic connections with motor neurons4. Those that do are bound by rules of motor pool specificity: they form strong connections with motor neurons supplying the same muscle, but avoid motor pools supplying antagonistic muscles1, 5, 6, 7. This pattern of connectivity is initially accurate and is maintained in the absence of activity8, implying that wiring specificity relies on the matching of recognition molecules on the surface of sensory and motor neurons. However, determinants of fine synaptic specificity here, as in most regions of the central nervous system, have yet to be defined. To address the origins of synaptic specificity in these reflex circuits we have used molecular genetic methods to manipulate recognition proteins expressed by subsets of sensory and motor neurons. We show here that a recognition system involving expression of the class 3 semaphorin Sema3e by selected motor neuron pools, and its high-affinity receptor plexin D1 (Plxnd1) by proprioceptive sensory neurons, is a critical determinant of synaptic specificity in sensory–motor circuits in mice. Changing the profile of Sema3e–Plxnd1 signalling in sensory or motor neurons results in functional and anatomical rewiring of monosynaptic connections, but does not alter motor pool specificity. Our findings indicate that patterns of monosynaptic connectivity in this prototypic central nervous system circuit are constructed through a recognition program based on repellent signalling.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Sensory-motor control: a long-awaited behavioral correlate of presynaptic inhibition

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Dec 2003)