Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 459, 506 (28 May 2009) | doi:10.1038/459506b; Published online 27 May 2009
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Scientist (Bioinformatics)
- Polyclone Bioservices Pvt. Ltd
- Bangalore India
Postdoctoral Fellows
- The Mathematical Biosciences Institute
- Ohio, USA
Cognition: theories of mind in animals and humans
Sara J Shettleworth1
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G3, Canada
Email: shettle@psych.utoronto.ca
I believe that Johan Bolhuis and Clive Wynne, in their Essay 'Can evolution explain how minds work?' (Nature 458, 832–833; 2009), profoundly misrepresent the burgeoning interdisciplinary field of comparative cognition research as being rife with anthropomorphism and ignorance of evolutionary principles.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
