Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 459, 253-256 (14 May 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature07921; Received 23 November 2008; Accepted 11 February 2009; Published online 6 April 2009
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Molecular Biologists and Biochemists
- University of Minnesota
- Minnesota, USA
Faculty Position - Center for Viral Oncology
- University of Kansas Medical Center
- Kansas City, KS
Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast
Jeff Gore1, Hyun Youk1 & Alexander van Oudenaarden1
- Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Correspondence to: Alexander van Oudenaarden1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.v.O. (Email: avano@mit.edu).
Abstract
The origin of cooperation is a central challenge to our understanding of evolution1, 2, 3. The fact that microbial interactions can be manipulated in ways that animal interactions cannot has led to a growing interest in microbial models of cooperation4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and competition11, 12. For the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to grow on sucrose, the disaccharide must first be hydrolysed by the enzyme invertase13, 14. This hydrolysis reaction is performed outside the cytoplasm in the periplasmic space between the plasma membrane and the cell wall. Here we demonstrate that the vast majority (
99 per cent) of the monosaccharides created by sucrose hydrolysis diffuse away before they can be imported into the cell, serving to make invertase production and secretion a cooperative behaviour15, 16. A mutant cheater strain that does not produce invertase is able to take advantage of and invade a population of wild-type cooperator cells. However, over a wide range of conditions, the wild-type cooperator can also invade a population of cheater cells. Therefore, we observe steady-state coexistence between the two strains in well-mixed culture resulting from the fact that rare strategies outperform common strategies—the defining features of what game theorists call the snowdrift game17. A model of the cooperative interaction incorporating nonlinear benefits explains the origin of this coexistence. We are able to alter the outcome of the competition by varying either the cost of cooperation or the glucose concentration in the media. Finally, we note that glucose repression of invertase expression in wild-type cells produces a strategy that is optimal for the snowdrift game—wild-type cells cooperate only when competing against cheater cells.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Behavioural evolution Cooperate with thy neighbour?Nature News and Views (08 Apr 2004)
Evolution The good, the bad and the lonelyNature News and Views (17 Oct 2002)
See all 5 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift gameNature Letters to Editor (08 Apr 2004)
Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeastNature Letters to Editor (25 May 2006)
See all 12 matches for Research
