Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 458, 865-867 (16 April 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature07934; Received 12 July 2008; Accepted 11 February 2009; Published online 22 March 2009
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Project Director, Nouabalé-Ndoki Park Project
- Wildlife Conservation Society
- Congo Republic
Senior Scientific Manager / Chief Scientific Manager for Metabolic Disorder and Cardiavascular Area In Vivo Pharmacology / Biology
- Syngene International
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India
A massive hypergiant star as the progenitor of the supernova SN 2005gl
- Benoziyo Center for Astrophysics , Faculty of Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
- Department of Astronomy, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, USA
Correspondence to: A. Gal-Yam1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.G.-Y. (Email: avishay.gal-yam@weizmann.ac.il.).
Abstract
Our understanding of the evolution of massive stars before their final explosions as supernovae is incomplete, from both an observational and a theoretical standpoint. A key missing piece in the supernova puzzle is the difficulty of identifying and studying progenitor stars. In only a single case—that of supernova SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud—has a star been detected at the supernova location before the explosion, and been subsequently shown to have vanished after the supernova event1. The progenitor of SN 1987A was a blue supergiant, which required a rethink of stellar evolution models2. The progenitor of supernova SN 2005gl was proposed to be an extremely luminous object3, but the association was not robustly established (it was not even clear that the putative progenitor was a single luminous star). Here we report that the previously proposed3 object was indeed the progenitor star of SN 2005gl. This very massive star was likely a luminous blue variable that standard stellar evolution predicts should not have exploded in that state.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Astronomy Champagne supernovaNature News and Views (21 Sep 2006)
Nuclear astrophysics Among the super brilliantNature Physics News and Views (01 Sep 2007)
See all 15 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
A giant outburst two years before the core-collapse of a massive starNature Letters to Editor (14 Jun 2007)
A blast wave from the 1843 eruption of &eegr; CarinaeNature Letters to Editor (11 Sep 2008)
See all 51 matches for Research
