Letter

Nature 457, 463-466 (22 January 2009) | doi:10.1038/nature07532; Received 5 June 2008; Accepted 10 October 2008; Published online 3 December 2008

A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks

Serguei Saavedra1,2,3, Felix Reed-Tsochas2,4 & Brian Uzzi5,6

  1. Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
  2. CABDyN Complexity Centre,
  3. Corporate Reputation Centre,
  4. James Martin Institute, Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1HP, UK
  5. Kellogg School of Management and Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  6. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Correspondence to: Felix Reed-Tsochas2,4 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to F.R-T. (Email: felix.reed-tsochas@sbs.ox.ac.uk).

In theoretical ecology, simple stochastic models that satisfy two basic conditions about the distribution of niche values and feeding ranges have proved successful in reproducing the overall structural properties of real food webs, using species richness and connectance as the only input parameters1, 2, 3, 4. Recently, more detailed models have incorporated higher levels of constraint in order to reproduce the actual links observed in real food webs5, 6. Here, building on previous stochastic models of consumer–resource interactions between species1, 2, 3, we propose a highly parsimonious model that can reproduce the overall bipartite structure of cooperative partner–partner interactions, as exemplified by plant–animal mutualistic networks7. Our stochastic model of bipartite cooperation uses simple specialization and interaction rules, and only requires three empirical input parameters. We test the bipartite cooperation model on ten large pollination data sets that have been compiled in the literature, and find that it successfully replicates the degree distribution, nestedness and modularity of the empirical networks. These properties are regarded as key to understanding cooperation in mutualistic networks8, 9, 10. We also apply our model to an extensive data set of two classes of company engaged in joint production in the garment industry. Using the same metrics, we find that the network of manufacturer–contractor interactions exhibits similar structural patterns to plant–animal pollination networks. This surprising correspondence between ecological and organizational networks suggests that the simple rules of cooperation that generate bipartite networks may be generic, and could prove relevant in many different domains, ranging from biological systems to human society11, 12, 13, 14.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

REVIEWS

Ecological networks and their fragility

Nature Review (20 Jul 2006)

NEWS AND VIEWS

Complex systems Cooperative network dynamics

Nature News and Views (23 Apr 2009)

Evolutionary biology Structure in mutualistic networks

Nature News and Views (23 Aug 2007)