Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 456, 792-794 (11 December 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature07395; Received 17 July 2008; Accepted 5 September 2008; Published online 19 October 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Academic Neuropathologist
- University Hospitals Case Medical Center
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Natural Products Chemist
- Praj Matrix - Praj Industries Ltd
- Pune, Maharashtra Pune-411021 India
Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics
Matthew D. Holland1 & Alan Hastings1
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
Correspondence to: Matthew D. Holland1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.D.H. (Email: mdholland@ucdavis.edu).
Abstract
A central question in ecology with great importance for management, conservation and biological control is how changing connectivity affects the persistence and dynamics of interacting species. Researchers in many disciplines have used large systems of coupled oscillators to model the behaviour of a diverse array of fluctuating systems in nature1, 2, 3, 4. In the well-studied regime of weak coupling, synchronization is favoured by increases in coupling strength and large-scale network structures (for example 'small worlds') that produce short cuts and clustering5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Here we show that, by contrast, randomizing the structure of dispersal networks in a model of predators and prey tends to favour asynchrony and prolonged transient dynamics, with resulting effects on the amplitudes of population fluctuations. Our results focus on synchronization and dynamics of clusters in models, and on timescales, more appropriate for ecology, namely smaller systems with strong interactions outside the weak-coupling regime, rather than the better-studied cases of large, weakly coupled systems. In these smaller systems, the dynamics of transients and the effects of changes in connectivity can be well understood using a set of methods including numerical reconstructions of phase dynamics, examinations of cluster formation and the consideration of important aspects of cyclic dynamics, such as amplitude.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Ecology Water fleas on cyclesNature News and Views (09 Dec 1999)
Ecology Evolution in population dynamicsNature News and Views (17 Jul 2003)
See all 8 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator?prey communityNature Letters to Editor (20 Aug 2009)
Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systemsNature Letters to Editor (27 May 1999)
See all 30 matches for Research
