Abstract
A central question in ecology with great importance for management, conservation and biological control is how changing connectivity affects the persistence and dynamics of interacting species. Researchers in many disciplines have used large systems of coupled oscillators to model the behaviour of a diverse array of fluctuating systems in nature1,2,3,4. In the well-studied regime of weak coupling, synchronization is favoured by increases in coupling strength and large-scale network structures (for example ‘small worlds’) that produce short cuts and clustering5,6,7,8,9. Here we show that, by contrast, randomizing the structure of dispersal networks in a model of predators and prey tends to favour asynchrony and prolonged transient dynamics, with resulting effects on the amplitudes of population fluctuations. Our results focus on synchronization and dynamics of clusters in models, and on timescales, more appropriate for ecology, namely smaller systems with strong interactions outside the weak-coupling regime, rather than the better-studied cases of large, weakly coupled systems. In these smaller systems, the dynamics of transients and the effects of changes in connectivity can be well understood using a set of methods including numerical reconstructions of phase dynamics, examinations of cluster formation and the consideration of important aspects of cyclic dynamics, such as amplitude.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Winfree, A. T. The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, 1980)
Kuramoto, Y. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, 1984)
Izhikevich, E. M. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting (MIT Press, 2007)
Blasius, B., Huppert, A. & Stone, L. Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems. Nature 399, 354–359 (1999)
Acebrón, J. A., Bonilla, L. L., Pérez Vicente, C. J., Ritort, F. & Spigler, R. The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137–185 (2005)
Watts, D. J. Small Worlds (Princeton Univ. Press, 1999)
Barahona, M. & Pecora, L. M. Synchronization in small-world systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 054101 (2002)
Hong, H., Choi, M. Y. & Kim, B. J. Synchronization on small-world networks. Phys. Rev. E 65, 026139 (2002)
Nishikawa, T., Motter, A. E., Lai, Y. C. & Hoppensteadt, F. C. Heterogeneity in oscillator networks: Are smaller worlds easier to synchronize? Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 014101 (2003)
Hassell, M. P. & May, R. M. Aggregation of predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J. Anim. Ecol. 43, 567–594 (1974)
Crowley, P. H. Dispersal and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat. 118, 673–701 (1981)
Comins, H. N. & Hassell, M. P. Persistence of multispecies host-parasitoid interactions in spatially distributed models with local dispersal. J. Theor. Biol. 183, 19–28 (1996)
Ellner, S. P. et al. Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community. Nature 412, 538–543 (2001)
Murdoch, W. W., Briggs, C. J. & Nisbet, R. M. Consumer-Resource Dynamics (Princeton Univ. Press, 2003)
Matthews, P. C., Mirollo, R. E. & Strogatz, S. H. Dynamics of a large system of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Physica D 52, 293–331 (1991)
Crooks, K. R. & Sanjayan, M. A. Connectivity Conservation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006)
Jansen, V. A. A. The dynamics of two diffusively coupled predator-prey populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 59, 119–131 (2001)
Hudgens, B. R. & Haddad, N. M. Predicting which species will benefit from corridors in fragmented landscapes from population growth models. Am. Nat. 161, 808–820 (2003)
Holyoak, M. Habitat patch arrangement and metapopulation persistence of predators and prey. Am. Nat. 156, 378–389 (2000)
Urban, D. & Keitt, T. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82, 1205–1218 (2001)
Tewksbury, J. J. et al. Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12923–12926 (2002)
Fortuna, M. A., Gómez-Rodriguez, C. & Bascompte, J. Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 1429–1434 (2006)
Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404, 755–758 (2000)
McIntire, E. J. B., Schultz, C. B. & Crone, E. E. Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 725–736 (2007)
Hastings, A. Transient dynamics and persistence of ecological systems. Ecol. Lett. 4, 215–220 (2001)
Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)
Rosenzweig, M. L. & MacArthur, R. H. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am. Nat. 97, 209–223 (1963)
Hilty, J. A., Lidicker, W. Z. & Merenlender, A. M. Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation (Island Press, 2006)
Cohen, S. D. & Hindmarsh, A. C. CVODE, a stiff/nonstiff ODE solver in C. Computers Phys. 10, 138–143 (1996)
Smith, S. W. The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing (California Technical Publishing, 1997)
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Holyoak for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and D. Wysham for discussions. M.D.H. was funded by a Quantitative Environmental and Integrative Biology grant to A.H. and M. Holyoak from the National Science Foundation.
Author Contributions M.D.H. wrote custom software, ran simulations and analyzed data. M.D.H. and A.H. designed the study and wrote the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains a Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Figures 1-15 with Legends. (PDF 3054 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holland, M., Hastings, A. Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics. Nature 456, 792–794 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07395
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07395
This article is cited by
-
Eco-evolutionary model on spatial graphs reveals how habitat structure affects phenotypic differentiation
Communications Biology (2022)
-
Asymmetric host movement reshapes local disease dynamics in metapopulations
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Chimera states and cluster solutions in Hindmarsh-Rose neural networks with state resetting process
Cognitive Neurodynamics (2022)
-
Patch isolation and periodic environmental disturbances have idiosyncratic effects on local and regional population variabilities in meta-food chains
Theoretical Ecology (2021)
-
Exploring the dimensions of metapopulation persistence: a comparison of structural and temporal measures
Theoretical Ecology (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.