Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation

Abstract

Bridging the traditional gap between the spatio-temporal scales of weather and climate is a significant challenge facing the atmospheric community. In particular, progress in both medium-range and seasonal-to-interannual climate prediction relies on our understanding of recurrent weather patterns and the identification of specific causes responsible for their favoured occurrence, persistence or transition. Within this framework, I here present evidence that the main climate intra-seasonal oscillation in the tropics—the Madden–Julian Oscillation1,2 (MJO)—controls part of the distribution and sequences of the four daily weather regimes defined over the North Atlantic–European region in winter3. North Atlantic Oscillation4 (NAO) regimes are the most affected, allowing for medium-range predictability of their phase far exceeding the limit of around one week that is usually quoted. The tropical–extratropical lagged relationship is asymmetrical. Positive NAO events mostly respond to a mid-latitude low-frequency wave train initiated by the MJO in the western–central tropical Pacific and propagating eastwards. Precursors for negative NAO events are found in the eastern tropical Pacific–western Atlantic, leading to changes along the North Atlantic storm track. Wave-breaking diagnostics tend to support the MJO preconditioning and the role of transient eddies in setting the phase of the NAO. I present a simple statistical model to quantitatively assess the potential predictability of the daily NAO index or the sign of the NAO regimes when they occur. Forecasts are successful in 70 per cent of the cases based on the knowledge of the previous 12-day MJO phase used as a predictor. This promising skill could be of importance considering the tight link4 between weather regimes and both mean conditions and the chances of extreme events occurring over Europe. These findings are useful for further stressing the need to better simulate and forecast the tropical coupled ocean–atmosphere dynamics, which is a source of medium-to-long range predictability and is the Achilles’ heel of the current seamless prediction suites5,6,7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Wintertime North Atlantic weather regimes.
Figure 2: Dynamical and thermodynamical signatures of the eight phases of the MJO.
Figure 3: Lagged relationships between the eight phases of the MJO and the four North Atlantic weather regimes.
Figure 4: Asymmetrical tropical–extratropical connection between two specific phases of the MJO leading to NAO+ and NAO- events.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madden, R. A. & Julian, P. R. Observations of the 40–50 day tropical oscillation. Mon. Weath. Rev. 112, 1109–1123 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, C. Madden-Julian oscillation. Rev. Geophys. 43 10.1029/2004RG000158 (2005)

  3. Vautard, R. Multiple weather regimes over the North Atlantic: Analysis of precursors and successors. Mon. Weath. Rev. 118, 2056–2081 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G. & Visbeck, M. in North Atlantic Oscillation: Climate Significance and Environmental Impact (eds Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G. & Visbeck, M.) 1–35 (Geophys. Monogr. 134, American Geophysical Union, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vitard, F., Woolnough, S., Balmaseda, M. A. & Tompkins, A. M. Monthly forecast of the Madden-Julian Oscillation using a coupled GCM. Mon. Weath. Rev. 135, 2700–2715 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, J.-L. et al. Tropical intraseasonal variability in 14 IPCC AR4 climate models. Part I: convective signals. J. Clim. 19, 2665–2690 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Waliser, D. et al. The experimental MJO prediction project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 87, 425–431 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhold, B. & Pierrehumbert, R. Dynamics of weather regimes: quasi-stationary waves and blocking. Mon. Weath. Rev. 110, 1105–1145 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Straus, D., Corti, S. & Molteni, F. Circulation regimes: chaotic variability versus SST-forced predictability. J. Clim. 20, 2251–2272 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Molteni, F., Kuscharski, F. & Corti, S. in Predictability of Weather and Climate (eds Palmer, T. & Hagedorn, R.) 365–389 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Michelangeli, P., Vautard, R. & Legras, B. Weather regimes: recurrence and quasi-stationarity. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 1237–1256 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Philipp, A. et al. Long term variability of daily North Atlantic-European pressure patterns since 1850 classified by simulated annealing clustering. J. Clim. 20, 4065–4095 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slonosky, V. C. & Yiou, P. The North Atlantic Oscillation and its relationship with near surface temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 807–810 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hurrell, J. W. Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 26, 676–679 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wheeler, M. C. & Hendon, H. H. An all-season real-time multivariate MJO index: development of an index for monitoring and prediction. Mon. Weath. Rev. 132, 1917–1932 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matthews, A. J., Hoskins, B. J. & Masutani, M. The global response to tropical heating in the Madden-Julian Oscillation during northern winter. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 1991–2011 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferranti, L., Palmer, T. N., Molteni, F. & Klinker, E. Tropical-extratropical interaction associated with the 30–60 day oscillation and its impact on medium and extended range prediction. J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 2177–2199 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins, R. W. & Mo, K. C. Persistent North Pacific circulation anomalies and the tropical intraseasonal oscillation. J. Clim. 10, 223–244 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, S. & Miller, A. J. The interaction of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation. J. Clim. 18, 143–159 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Benedict, J. J., Lee, S. & Feldstein, S. B. Synoptic view of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 121–144 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Franske, C., Lee, S. & Feldstein, S. B. Is the North Atlantic Oscillation a breaking wave? J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 145–160 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rivière, G. & Orlanski, I. Characteristics of the Atlantic storm track eddy activity and its relationship with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 241–266 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Feldstein, S. B. The dynamics of NAO teleconnection pattern growth and decay. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129, 901–924 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Croci-Maspoli, M., Schwierz, C. & Davies, H. Atmospheric blocking: space-time links to the NAO and PNA. Clim. Dyn. 29, 713–725 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scherrer, S. C., Croci-Maspoli, M., Schwierz, C. & Appenzeller, C. Two dimensional indices of atmospheric blocking and their relationship with winter climate patterns in the Euro-Atlantic region. Int. J. Climatol. 26, 233–249 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tyrrell, G. C., Karoly, D. J. & McBride, J. L. Links between tropical convection and variations of the extratropical circulation during TOGA-CORE. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 2735–2748 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sardeshmukh, P. & Hoskins, B. The generation of global rotational flow by steady idealized tropical divergence. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 1228–1251 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoskins, B. J. & Ambrizzi, T. Rossby wave propagation on a realistic longitudinally varying flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 1661–1671 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Woollings, T., Hoskins, B., Blackburn, M. & Berrisford, P. A new Rossby wave-breaking interpretation of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 609–626 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, S. J. & Baddour, O. in Seasonal Climate: Forecasting and Managing Risk (eds Troccoli, A., Harrison, M., Anderson, D. L. T. & Mason, S. J.) 163–201 (Springer, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank L. Terray, G. Rivière, R. Madden, G. Madec and C. Périgaud for discussions. The author also thanks F. Chauvin, H. Douville and S. Valcke for comments on the manuscript. The author is very grateful to O. Mestre and J.-P. Céron for their help with statistics. The figures were produced using the NCL software developed at NCAR. This work was supported by CNRS and by the European Union’s Sixth Framework Programme (DYNAMITE and ENSEMBLES).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Cassou.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods with Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Discussion with Supplementary Figures 2-9 and Supplementary Notes (PDF 1139 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassou, C. Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden–Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature 455, 523–527 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing