Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 454, 575 (31 July 2008) | doi:10.1038/454575a; Published online 30 July 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Scientist (Bioinformatics)
- Polyclone Bioservices Pvt. Ltd
- Bangalore India
Postdoctoral Fellows
- The Mathematical Biosciences Institute
- Ohio, USA
Integrity: how to measure breaches effectively
Judith P. Swazey1
- PO Box 243, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA
Email: jswazey@verizon.net
When suspected scientific misconduct occurs in a research department, it is likely that more than one person knows about it. In their Commentary (Nature 453, 980—982; 2008), Sandra Titus and colleagues avoid the multiple-reporting problem in estimating the incidence of misconduct by surveying one person per academic department about suspected misconduct within that department.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Titus et al. reply:Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonestyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: Croatia's standards unusual in much of EuropeNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: misconduct by a few damages credibility for manyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
