Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 454, 575 (31 July 2008) | doi:10.1038/454575a; Published online 30 July 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Deputy Manager-Pharma / CRO -Global Strategic Sourcing / Business Development
- Varda Biotech
- Mumbai India
30 Doctoral Stipends for Outstanding Young Researchers
- Christian-Albrechts-Universitat zu Kiel
- Kiel, Germany
Integrity: how to measure breaches effectively
Judith P. Swazey1
- PO Box 243, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA
Email: jswazey@verizon.net
When suspected scientific misconduct occurs in a research department, it is likely that more than one person knows about it. In their Commentary (Nature 453, 980—982; 2008), Sandra Titus and colleagues avoid the multiple-reporting problem in estimating the incidence of misconduct by surveying one person per academic department about suspected misconduct within that department.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Titus et al. reply:Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonestyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: Croatia's standards unusual in much of EuropeNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: misconduct by a few damages credibility for manyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
