Access

Correspondence

Nature 454, 575 (31 July 2008) | doi:10.1038/454575a; Published online 30 July 2008

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

Integrity: how to measure breaches effectively

Judith P. Swazey1

  1. PO Box 243, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA
    Email: jswazey@verizon.net

When suspected scientific misconduct occurs in a research department, it is likely that more than one person knows about it. In their Commentary (Nature 453, 980—982; 2008), Sandra Titus and colleagues avoid the multiple-reporting problem in estimating the incidence of misconduct by surveying one person per academic department about suspected misconduct within that department.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

RESEARCH

Titus et al. reply:

Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)

Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonesty

Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)

Integrity: Croatia's standards unusual in much of Europe

Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)

Integrity: misconduct by a few damages credibility for many

Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)