Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 454, 574 (31 July 2008) | doi:10.1038/454574b; Published online 30 July 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
nature jobs
BE / BC Gastroenterologist
- Meadville Medical Center
- Meadville, PA
Faculty Positions
- University of Texas Medical Branch
- Galveston, TX United States
Integrity: juniors see leaders gain from calculated dishonesty
Ned Feder1 & Walter W. Stewart2
- Project On Government Oversight, 666 11th Street NW, Washington DC 20001, USA
Email: nfeder@pogo.org - Lone Rider Trail, Austin, Texas 78738, USA
Sandra Titus and her colleagues examine a problem that many scientists would prefer to ignore in their Commentary 'Repairing research integrity', (Nature 453, 980-982; 2008). Their survey of extramural scientists funded by the US National Institutes of Health indicates that many cases of scientific misconduct may not be reported to their institutions and that even fewer come to the attention of the government funding agency.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Integrity: misconduct by a few damages credibility for manyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: how to measure breaches effectivelyNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Integrity: Croatia's standards unusual in much of EuropeNature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)
Titus et al. reply:Nature Correspondence (31 Jul 2008)

