Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 453, 910-913 (12 June 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature07073; Received 21 December 2007; Accepted 28 April 2008
nature jobs
Chief Scientific Manager - Medicinal Chemistry
- Syngene International
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India
System Engineer (Mechanical)
- Praj Matrix - Praj Industries Ltd
- Pune, Maharashtra Pune-411021 India
Continental mantle signature of Bushveld magmas and coeval diamonds
Stephen H. Richardson1 & Steven B. Shirey2
- Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
- Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington DC 20015, USA
Correspondence to: Stephen H. Richardson1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.H.R. (Email: steve.richardson@uct.ac.za).
Abstract
The emplacement of the 2.05-billion-year-old Bushveld complex, the world's largest layered intrusion and platinum-group element (PGE) repository1, is a singular event in the history of the Kaapvaal craton of southern Africa2, 3, 4, one of Earth's earliest surviving continental nuclei. In the prevailing model for the complex's mineralization, the radiogenic strontium and osmium isotope signatures of Bushveld PGE ores are attributed to continental crustal contamination of the host magmas5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. The scale of the intrusion and lateral homogeneity of the PGE-enriched layers1, however, have long been problematical for the crustal contamination model, given the typically heterogeneous nature of continental crust. Furthermore, the distribution of Bushveld magmatism matches that of seismically anomalous underlying mantle3, 12, implying significant interaction before emplacement in the crust. Mineral samples of the ancient 200-km-deep craton keel, encapsulated in macrodiamonds and entrained by proximal kimberlites, reveal the nature of continental mantle potentially incorporated by Bushveld magmas13, 14. Here we show that sulphide inclusions in
2-billion-year-old diamonds from the 0.5-billion-year-old Venetia and 1.2-billion-year-old Premier kimberlites (on opposite sides of the complex) have initial osmium isotope ratios even more radiogenic than those of Bushveld sulphide ore minerals6, 15. Sulphide Re–Os and silicate Sm–Nd and Rb–Sr isotope compositions indicate that continental mantle harzburgite and eclogite components, in addition to the original convecting mantle magma, most probably contributed to the genesis of both the diamonds and the Bushveld complex. Coeval diamonds provide key evidence that the main source of Bushveld PGEs is the mantle rather than the crust.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Earth science Journey beneath southern AfricaNature News and Views (23 Aug 2001)
Growth of lithospheric mantleNature News and Views (17 Aug 1989)
See all 3 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Three generations of diamonds from old continental mantleNature Letters to Editor (18 Nov 1993)
40 Ar/ 39 Ar laser-probe dating of diamond inclusions from the Premier kimberliteNature Letters to Editor (10 Aug 1989)
See all 36 matches for Research
