Access

Authors

Nature 453, x (5 June 2008) | doi:10.1038/7196xc; Published online 4 June 2008

Open Innovation Challenges

naturejobs

From the blogosphere

Does a scientist who has had three patents in the past five years, but only three papers, each cited just three times, deserve more recognition than one with five Nature papers and 1,000 citations? Does a scientist who works in a hot field and has made nice contributions deserve more credit than another working in a less glamorous, lonelier field, who has made equally profound contributions?

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Materials chemistry Liquid crystals stack up

Nature News and Views (17 Oct 2002)