FIGURE 2. The coupled variable-resistor model for a memristor.
From the following article:
Dmitri B. Strukov, Gregory S. Snider, Duncan R. Stewart & R. Stanley Williams
Nature 453, 80-83(1 May 2008)
doi:10.1038/nature06932

a, Diagram with a simplified equivalent circuit. V, voltmeter; A, ammeter. b, c, The applied voltage (blue) and resulting current (green) as a function of time t for a typical memristor. In b the applied voltage is v0sin(
0t) and the resistance ratio is
, and in c the applied voltage is
v0sin2(
0t) and
, where v0 is the magnitude of the applied voltage and
0 is the frequency. The numbers 1–6 label successive waves in the applied voltage and the corresponding loops in the i–v curves. In each plot the axes are dimensionless, with voltage, current, time, flux and charge expressed in units of v0 = 1 V,
, t0
2
/
0
D2/
Vv0 = 10 ms, v0t0 and i0t0, respectively. Here i0 denotes the maximum possible current through the device, and t0 is the shortest time required for linear drift of dopants across the full device length in a uniform field v0/D, for example with D = 10 nm and
V = 10-10 cm2 s-1 V-1. We note that, for the parameters chosen, the applied bias never forces either of the two resistive regions to collapse; for example, w/D does not approach zero or one (shown with dashed lines in the middle plots in b and c). Also, the dashed i–v plot in b demonstrates the hysteresis collapse observed with a tenfold increase in sweep frequency. The insets in the i–v plots in b and c show that for these examples the charge is a single-valued function of the flux, as it must be in a memristor.
