Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition

Abstract

The retinotectal projection has long been studied experimentally and theoretically, as a model for the formation of topographic brain maps1,2,3. Neighbouring retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project their axons to neighbouring positions in the optic tectum, thus re-establishing a continuous neural representation of visual space. Mapping along this axis requires chemorepellent signalling from tectal cells, expressing ephrin-A ligands, to retinal growth cones, expressing EphA receptors4. High concentrations of ephrin A, increasing from anterior to posterior, prevent temporal axons from invading the posterior tectum. However, the force that drives nasal axons to extend past the anterior tectum and terminate in posterior regions remains to be identified. We tested whether axon–axon interactions, such as competition, are required for posterior tectum innervation. By transplanting blastomeres from a wild-type (WT) zebrafish into a lakritz (lak) mutant, which lacks all RGCs5, we created chimaeras with eyes that contained single RGCs. These solitary RGCs often extended axons into the tectum, where they branched to form a terminal arbor. Here we show that the distal tips of these arbors were positioned at retinotopically appropriate positions, ruling out an essential role for competition in innervation of the ephrin-A-rich posterior tectum. However, solitary arbors were larger and more complex than under normal, crowded conditions, owing to a lack of pruning of proximal branches during refinement of the retinotectal projection. We conclude that dense innervation is not required for targeting of retinal axons within the zebrafish tectum but serves to restrict arbor size and shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Two potential mechanisms for formation of the retinotectal map.
Figure 2: Retinotectal mapping functions in the presence or absence of axon–axon interactions.
Figure 3: Evidence for normal patterning of retina and tectum in lak mutants.
Figure 4: Axon competition restricts axon arbor size and complexity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodhill, G. J. Contributions of theoretical modeling to the understanding of neural map development. Neuron 56, 301–311 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruthazer, E. S. & Cline, H. T. Insights into activity-dependent map formation from the retinotectal system: a middle-of-the-brain perspective. J. Neurobiol. 59, 134–146 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemke, G. & Reber, M. Retinotectal mapping: new insights from molecular genetics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 551–580 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Flanagan, J. G. Neural map specification by gradients. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 59–66 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kay, J. N., Finger-Baier, K. C., Roeser, T., Staub, W. & Baier, H. Retinal ganglion cell genesis requires lakritz, a zebrafish atonal homolog. Neuron 30, 725–736 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hornberger, M. R. et al. Modulation of EphA receptor function by coexpressed ephrinA ligands on retinal ganglion cell axons. Neuron 22, 731–742 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvalho, R. F. et al. Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5. Nature Neurosci. 9, 322–330 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Monschau, B. et al. Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons. EMBO J. 16, 1258–1267 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sperry, R. W. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50, 703–710 (1963)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gierer, A. Model for the retino-tectal projection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 218, 77–93 (1983)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Honda, H. Competition between retinal ganglion axons for targets under the servomechanism model explains abnormal retinocollicular projection of Eph receptor-overexpressing or ephrin-lacking mice. J. Neurosci. 23, 10368–10377 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yates, P. A., Holub, A. D., McLaughlin, T., Sejnowski, T. J. & O’Leary, D. D. Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphA–ephrinA gradients, axon–axon interactions, and patterned activity. J. Neurobiol. 59, 95–113 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reber, M., Burrola, P. & Lemke, G. A relative signalling model for the formation of a topographic neural map. Nature 431, 847–853 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsigankov, D. N. & Koulakov, A. A. A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin–A deficient mice. J. Comput. Neurosci. 21, 101–114 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodhill, G. J. & Xu, J. The development of retinotectal maps: a review of models based on molecular gradients. Network 16, 5–34 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Willshaw, D. Analysis of mouse EphA knockins and knockouts suggests that retinal axons programme target cells to form ordered retinotopic maps. Development 133, 2705–2717 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser, S. E. & Perkel, D. H. Competitive and positional cues in the patterning of nerve connections. J. Neurobiol. 21, 51–72 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kay, J. N., Link, B. A. & Baier, H. Staggered cell-intrinsic timing of ath5 expression underlies the wave of ganglion cell neurogenesis in the zebrafish retina. Development 132, 2573–2585 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poggi, L., Vitorino, M., Masai, I. & Harris, W. A. Influences on neural lineage and mode of division in the zebrafish retina in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 171, 991–999 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao, T., Roeser, T., Staub, W. & Baier, H. A GFP-based genetic screen reveals mutations that disrupt the architecture of the zebrafish retinotectal projection. Development 132, 2955–2967 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stuermer, C. A. Retinotopic organization of the developing retinotectal projection in the zebrafish embryo. J. Neurosci. 8, 4513–4530 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hua, J. Y., Smear, M. C., Baier, H. & Smith, S. J. Regulation of axon growth in vivo by activity-based competition. Nature 434, 1022–1026 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smear, M. C. et al. Vesicular glutamate transport at a central synapse limits the acuity of visual perception in zebrafish. Neuron 53, 65–77 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baier, H. et al. Genetic dissection of the retinotectal projection. Development 123, 415–425 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brennan, C. et al. Two Eph receptor tyrosine kinase ligands control axon growth and may be involved in the creation of the retinotectal map in the zebrafish. Development 124, 655–664 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Picker, A. et al. Requirement for the zebrafish mid-hindbrain boundary in midbrain polarisation, mapping and confinement of the retinotectal projection. Development 126, 2967–2978 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hansen, M. J., Dallal, G. E. & Flanagan, J. G. Retinal axon response to ephrin–As shows a graded, concentration-dependent transition from growth promotion to inhibition. Neuron 42, 717–730 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rashid, T. et al. Opposing gradients of ephrin–As and EphA7 in the superior colliculus are essential for topographic mapping in the mammalian visual system. Neuron 47, 57–69 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. von Boxberg, Y., Deiss, S. & Schwarz, U. Guidance and topographic stabilization of nasal chick retinal axons on target-derived components in vitro. Neuron 10, 345–357 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ichijo, H. & Bonhoeffer, F. Differential withdrawal of retinal axons induced by a secreted factor. J. Neurosci. 18, 5008–5018 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Haas, K., Sin, W. C., Javaherian, A., Li, Z. & Cline, H. T. Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo. Neuron 29, 583–591 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Xiao, A. Picker, U. Drescher, K. Haas and H. Cline for reagents and advice, and J. Pinkston-Gosse and members of the Baier laboratory for review of the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (H.B. and N.J.G.) and a March of Dimes Research Grant (H.B.).

Author Contributions N.J.G., L.M.N. and H.B. devised experiments. N.J.G. performed all transplantation experiments and quantified images. L.M.N. conducted single-cell labelling studies in the tectum. N.J.G. and H.B. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herwig Baier.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video

The file contains Supplementary Video S1 with RGC axon pathfinding errors during retinal exit in WTBrn3c:mGFP- lak chimeras. Dorsal confocal stack of 7 dpf WTBrn3c:mGFP- lak chimera with ˜5 RGCs in varying retinal positions projecting axons. One axon (blue arrow), is visible exiting the retina, but peripheral RGC axons meander and branch in aberrant directions (red arrows). Similar errors were seen in 〈5% of WTBrn3c:mGFP- lak chimeras with one or more axons projecting to the tectum. Orientation: nasal up, temporal down. (MOV 10950 kb)

Supplementary Figures

The file contains Supplementary Figures S2, S3: Example quantification of retinal and tectal position in a single chimeric larva and corresponding legend. Frequency of cell types identified by single cell electroporation in WT and lakritz larvae and corresponding legend. (PDF 19634 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gosse, N., Nevin, L. & Baier, H. Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition. Nature 452, 892–895 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06816

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06816

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing