Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 452, 882-886 (17 April 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature06718; Received 13 November 2007; Accepted 15 January 2008; Published online 19 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
nature jobs
Laboratory Technician (Pharmaceutics)
- Alliance Institute of Advanced Pharmacy and Health Sciences
- Hyderabad 500038 India
Faculty Position in Mathematical Biology
- The Ohio State University
- Ohio, USA
Integration of growth and specification in chick wing digit-patterning
Matthew Towers1,2, Ruth Mahood1, Yili Yin1 & Cheryll Tickle1,2
- Division of Cell and Developmental Biology, WTB/MSI Complex, University of Dundee, Dow Street, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK
- Present address: Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Correspondence to: Cheryll Tickle1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.T. (Email: cat24@bath.ac.uk).
Abstract
In the classical model of chick wing digit-patterning1, the polarizing region—a group of cells at the posterior margin of the early bud—produces a morphogen gradient, now known to be based on Sonic hedgehog (Shh)2, 3, that progressively specifies anteroposterior positional identities in the posterior digit-forming region4. Here we add an integral growth component to this model by showing that Shh-dependent proliferation of prospective digit progenitor cells is essential for specifying the complete pattern of digits across the anteroposterior axis. Inhibiting Shh signalling in early wing buds reduced anteroposterior expansion, and posterior digits were lost because all prospective digit precursors formed anterior structures. Inhibiting proliferation also irreversibly reduced anteroposterior expansion, but instead anterior digits were lost because all prospective digit precursors formed posterior structures. When proliferation recovered in such wings, Shh transcription was maintained for longer than normal, suggesting that duration of Shh expression is controlled by a mechanism that measures proliferation. Rescue experiments confirmed that Shh-dependent proliferation controls digit number during a discrete time-window in which Shh-dependent specification normally occurs. Our findings that Shh signalling has dual functions that can be temporally uncoupled have implications for understanding congenital and evolutionary digit reductions.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
The progress zone ? alive or dead?Nature Cell Biology News and Views (01 Sep 2002)
The limb bud ? part twoNature News and Views (13 Oct 1994)
See all 7 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Integration of growth and specification in chick wing digit-patterningNature Letters to Editor (17 Apr 2008)
Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakesNature Letters to Editor (03 Jun 1999)
See all 52 matches for Research
