Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Brief Communication Arising
Nature 452, E5 (20 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature06785; Received 29 August 2007; Accepted 17 January 2008
There is a Letter (19 April 2007) associated with this document.
There is a Brief Communication Arising (20 March 2008) associated with this document.
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Optimizing Sub-cellular Localization Tags
The Seeker is looking for methods to optimize sub-cellular localization tags for protein expression....
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Apply for PhD Program
- Shinshu University
- Ueda, Nagano 386-8567 Japan
Senior Scientist, Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology
- Cortex Search Inc.
- Vancouver, British Columbia
Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?
Guy Kahane1 & Nicholas Shackel2,3
Abstract
Arising from: M. Koenigs et al. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007); Koenigs et al. reply
Neuroscience has recently turned to the study of utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgement. Koenigs et al.1 examine the responses of normal subjects and those with ventromedial–prefrontal–cortex (VMPC) damage to moral scenarios drawn from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies by Greene et al.2, 3, 4, and claim that patients with VMPC damage have an abnormally "utilitarian" pattern of moral judgement. It is crucial to the claims of Koenigs et al. that the scenarios of Greene et al. pose a conflict between utilitarian consequence and duty: however, many of them do not meet this condition. Because of this methodological problem, it is too early to claim that VMPC patients have a utilitarian bias.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
