Access

Correspondence

Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028b; Published online 5 March 2008

naturejobs

More science jobs
Post a job for free

Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway

K. Razi Naqvi1

  1. Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway

In your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008), you suggest that authors may be vulnerable to bias if referees guess their identities — for example, bias about their previous work, their gender, their nationality or their being new to a field.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

RESEARCH

Gender and Strain Influence on Neurogenesis in Dentate Gyrus of Young Rats

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism Original Article