Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028b; Published online 5 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Molecular Biologists and Biochemists
- University of Minnesota
- Minnesota, USA
Professor of Psychosomatic Medicine (W2)
- The University Hospital Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy
- Jena Germany
Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
K. Razi Naqvi1
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
In your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008), you suggest that authors may be vulnerable to bias if referees guess their identities — for example, bias about their previous work, their gender, their nationality or their being new to a field.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Gender and Strain Influence on Neurogenesis in Dentate Gyrus of Young RatsJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism Original Article
