Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028b; Published online 5 March 2008
nature jobs
Deputy Manager-Pharma / CRO -Global Strategic Sourcing / Business Development
- Varda Biotech
- Mumbai India
Laboratory Technician (Pharmaceutics)
- Alliance Institute of Advanced Pharmacy and Health Sciences
- Hyderabad 500038 India
Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
K. Razi Naqvi1
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
In your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008), you suggest that authors may be vulnerable to bias if referees guess their identities — for example, bias about their previous work, their gender, their nationality or their being new to a field.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Gender and Strain Influence on Neurogenesis in Dentate Gyrus of Young RatsJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism Original Article

