Correspondence

Nature 451, 520 (31 January 2008) | doi:10.1038/451520a; Published online 30 January 2008

The action of enhancers can lead to addiction

Nora D. Volkow1 & James M. Swanson2

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 5274, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
  2. University of California at Irvine, Child Development Center, Irvine, California 92612, USA

Sir

Sahakian and Morein-Zamir revive questions about the widespread availability and diversion of prescription medications for non-clinical use in healthy individuals (Nature 450, 1157–1159; 2007). Such questions drove legislators to impose controls a few decades ago, when amphetamines and barbiturates were widely available.

Because the diversion of drugs is linked to their availability, the World Health Organization monitors their production and consumption by individual nations. In the United States, production of stimulant drugs has soared during the past two decades, and enough are now produced each year for the daily treatment of at least four million individuals. Even though stimulants and other cognitive enhancers are intended for legitimate clinical use, history predicts that greater availability will lead to an increase in diversion, misuse and abuse. Among high-school students, abuse of prescription medications is second only to cannabis use.

Although access to medications that improve our cognitive performance might be desirable in theory, these may have adverse medical consequences. Some limitations are necesssary, for these medications can be addictive. This is because cognitive enhancers such as the stimulants methylphenidate (Ritalin) and amphetamine amplify the activity of dopamine, a neurotransmitter that increases saliency, making cognitive tasks and everyday activities seem more interesting and rewarding. This learned experience can lead to abuse of the drug and to compulsive use and addiction in vulnerable people.

As we increase our knowledge of how the brain works, we may one day have safe interventions to improve cognition. In the meantime, we need to learn from history and avoid using them unnecessarily.

All Correspondence this week responds to Barbara Sahakian and Sharon Morein-Zamir's Commentary 'Professor's little helper' (Nature 450, 1157–1159; 2007) and the related discussion at http://network.nature.com/forums/naturenewsandopinion.

This week, Nature launches an anonymous online survey to build on the informal questionnaire that the Commentary authors sent academics on the usage of brain-boosting drugs. In aggregate, the survey results will guide future editorial content on this topic. To take part, please visit: http://tinyurl.com/yq7nn3.

Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to correspondence@nature.com. Published contributions are edited. Readers are welcome to contribute to this discussion and many others at http://network.nature.com.

Extra navigation

.

Open Innovation Challenges

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT