TABLE 1
From the following article:
Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces
James A. Wells & Christopher L. McClendon
Nature 450, 1001-1009(13 December 2007)
doi:10.1038/nature06526
Table 1. Comparison of protein and small-molecule binding partners.
| Ligand | Molecular mass (Da) | PDB identity of complex | Affinity ( M)* | Ligand efficiency (kcal per mol per non-hydrogen atom)† | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*Where a direct binding dissociation constant was not available or was not the lowest measured, the Ki or IC50 was used instead. | |||||
†Ligand-efficiency values for the protein–protein pair are given as binding free energy (- | |||||
‡The ligand in the X-ray structure is markedly similar to the compound listed. | |||||
| IL-2 | |||||
IL-2 receptor -chain | 24,790 | 1Z92 | 0.0105 | 0.11 | 33 |
| SP4206 | 663 | 1PY2 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 31, 34 |
| BCL-XL | |||||
| BAD-derived peptide (amino acids 100–126) | 3,110 | 2BZW | 0.0006 | 0.16 | 89 |
| ABT-737 | 813 | 2YXJ | 0.0006 | 0.23 | 47 |
| HDM2 | |||||
| p53-derived peptide (amino acids 15–29) | 1,808 | 1YCR | 0.6 | 0.12 | 51 |
| Nutlin-3 | 581 | 1RV1‡ | 0.09 | 0.24 | 53 |
| Benzodiazepinedione | 566 | 1T4E | 0.067 | 0.31 | 54, 55 |
| HPV E2 | |||||
| E1 | 24,630 | 1TUE | 0.06 | 0.14 | 62 |
| Compound 23 | 684 | 1R6N‡ | 0.006 | 0.28 | 60, 61 |
| ZipA | |||||
| FtsZ-derived peptide (amino acids 367–383) | 2,024 | 1F47 | 21.6 | 0.13 | 63 |
| Compound 1 | 425 | 1Y2F | 12 | 0.23 | 67 |
| TNF | |||||
| Subunit protein | 17,381 | 1TNF | ND | ND | 90 |
| SP304 | 548 | 2AZ5 | 13 | 0.17 | 70 |

M)
G, in kcal per mol) per non-hydrogen contact atom, because so little of the protein is in contact. Ligand-efficiency values for the small molecule are given as binding free energy (kcal per mol) per non-hydrogen atom
-chain