Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 449, 535 (4 October 2007) | doi:10.1038/449535e; Published online 3 October 2007
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Assistant Editor – Nature Immunology
- Nature Publishing Group
- New York, NY United States
John Innes Centre Project Leader in Plant or Microbial Sciences
- University of East Anglia
- Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Sic is not enough; historical wording should be changed
Sanya Samac1
- Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
Your decision to insert sic after "scientific men" in reprints of your historical mission statement ('Men [sic]' Nature 448, 728; 2007) shows that you are more concerned about the historical integrity of your mission statement than for decency and justice. Why make a mere "tiny step" in the "right direction"?
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Expert assessment of exposure to carcinogens in Norway's offshore petroleum industryJournal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology Article Response
