Review

Nature 448, 767-774 (16 August 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature05985

The common biology of cancer and ageing

Toren Finkel1, Manuel Serrano2 & Maria A. Blasco2

Top

At first glance, cancer and ageing would seem to be unlikely bedfellows. Yet the origins for this improbable union can actually be traced back to a sequence of tragic—and some say unethical—events that unfolded more than half a century ago. Here we review the series of key observations that has led to a complex but growing convergence between our understanding of the biology of ageing and the mechanisms that underlie cancer.

Like so many areas of science, our subject is one that has no true beginning, and as yet, no clear ending. However, if we must begin somewhere, it would be in the winter of 1951, when a 31-yr-old woman and mother of five small children underwent a seemingly routine biopsy for a suspicious cervical mass. A portion of that biopsy went as usual to the pathology lab for diagnosis; unbeknownst to the patient, another portion was diverted to the research laboratory of two investigators at Johns Hopkins, George and Martha Gey. The Geys had spent the better part of the preceding twenty years attempting to find a human cell that could grow indefinitely in laboratory culture conditions. That search would end with the arrival of this particular biopsy sample. Unfortunately for the patient, the pathology laboratory quickly confirmed that the mass was indeed cancer and, despite surgery and radium treatment, the patient succumbed to her disease a mere eight months later. On the day of her death, in October 1951, George Gey appeared on national television in the United States to announce that a new era in medical research had begun. For the first time, he explained, it was now possible to grow human cells continuously in the laboratory. He termed the cell line he had created the 'HeLa cell', in memory of Henrietta Lacks, the unfortunate young mother whose biopsy sample made all this possible.

Over the next 50 years, researchers would slowly strip away many of the secrets of how a cancer cell achieves and maintains its immortality. Here we review those efforts in an attempt to give both a historical perspective and an update on the more recent experimental highlights. In particular, we will focus on five aspects of cancer biology that appear to be particularly informative about normal ageing: the connection between cellular senescence and tumour formation; the common role of genomic instability; the biology of the telomere; the emerging importance of autophagy in both cancer and ageing; and the central roles of mitochondrial metabolism and energetic-dependent signal transduction in both processes. Together, these findings seem to indicate that both cancer and ageing represent complex biological tapestries that are often—but not always—woven by similar molecular threads.

Top

Cellular senescence as a block to tumour formation

The Geys' success in cultivating human cancer cells spurred a huge interest in isolating as many types of human cells as possible. These early 'cell culturists' quickly recognized that few, if any, of the isolated cell lines maintained a diploid status. This problem led Leonard Hayflick and Paul Moorhead to turn their attention to a particular source of tissue that is now off limits to many scientists. Using human fetal explants, these investigators found that it was possible to grow and maintain normal diploid fibroblasts. Hayflick and Moorhead emphasized that such isolates were not clonal cell lines, but polyclonal pools or strains1. Despite their success in growing these cell lines for several months, they soon stumbled upon another curious phenomenon: cells could not be subcultivated more than about 50 times. They noted that the culture medium was not to blame because if they took early passage cells and transferred them to the conditioned media from late passage cells "luxurious growth invariably results." On the basis of this and other arguments, such as the fact that frozen cells retained the memory of their subcultivation history, they concluded that some intrinsic factor/s (later termed 'Hayflick factors') accumulated in these cells until they 'senesced'1. In a further leap of speculation, they proposed that this cellular phenomenon could be relevant for organismal ageing. The degree of that relevance remains hotly debated, although it is now clear that the senescent response can be triggered by a wide variety of cellular stresses including the loss of telomeres, the de-repression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2a (CDKN2a, also known as INK4a or ARF) locus, or the accumulation of DNA damage and the subsequent activation of the DNA damage response. Furthermore, the critical executioners of senescence in response to the above factors seem to include the well known tumour suppressor pathways that are controlled by retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) and P53, proteins that have been widely implicated in tumorigenesis.

The CDKN2a locus encodes two separate proteins including p16INK4a, which regulates RB1 activity by directly inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinases, and p19ARF, which regulates the function of P53. Soon after the initial discovery of p16INK4a (ref. 2) it was observed that the levels of p16INK4a increased progressively with the proliferative history of cells in culture3, 4. Moreover, it was found that the expression of certain oncogenes accelerated the de-repression of the CDKN2a locus, a phenomenon that was called 'oncogene-induced senescence'5, 6. Since then, a wealth of data has supported a model in which cells 'memorize' excessive mitogenic stimulation and cell divisions, in part through the de-repression of the CDKN2a locus. The mechanistic details of how this happens are starting to emerge, and seem in part to involve the progressive loss of repressive Polycomb complexes7. Genes of the Polycomb family encode highly conserved but poorly understood proteins that seem to epigenetically repress many target genes by regulating the level of histone methylation.

The relevance of senescence for cancer protection can be rationalized if senescence is considered as a stress-induced barrier that limits the proliferative potential of damaged cells. In keeping with this notion, recent data have shown that there are abundant senescent cells within tumours, thus moving these observations from the realm of the plastic plate into the arena of real cancer biology5, 6 (Fig. 1). This intra-tumoral senescence is thought to be triggered mainly by oncogenic signals that can function in part by de-repressing the CDKN2a locus. Another crucial mediator of oncogene-induced senescence seems to be the activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, presumably by the hyper-replication that is characteristic of cancer cells8, 9. With regards to in vivo senescence, the hierarchy and crosstalk between induction of the CDKN2a locus and the activation of the DDR are not well understood. Another recent surprise was the rapid in vivo clearance of tumour cells that undergo P53-triggered senescence10, 11. At least in one system, this clearance seems to occur through the activation of the innate immune system10. This is relevant because standard chemotherapy and radiotherapy might function in part by inducing senescence within the tumour mass12. In addition, other evidence indicates that the immune system's recognition of tumour cells might require the continuous activation of the DDR pathway13. Although they are intriguing, such observations need to be placed in the appropriate context, as it is clear that most human malignancies develop in the presence of a functional immune system. Similarly, tissues that undergo normal ageing can accumulate significant numbers of senescent cells, seemingly without provoking a robust immunological response14, 15.

Figure 1: The potential interplay between stem cells, stress, ageing and cancer.
Figure 1 : The potential interplay between stem cells, stress, ageing and cancer. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

During normal ageing, stem cells accumulate damage and subsequent stress-dependent changes (for example, de-repression of the CDKN2a (INK4a/ARF) locus or telomere shortening). This leads to the increasing abundance of senescent cells (large blue cells) within differentiated tissues. Incipient tumours, arising directly from stem cells or from more committed cells, undergo rapid proliferation (small red cells). These pre-malignant tumour cells rapidly accumulate damage, in part owing to the presence of oncogenes, leading to a higher proportion of tumour cells becoming senescent (small blue cells). Tumour progression to full malignancy is favoured when tumour cells acquire mutations that impair the senescence program (for example, mutations in Trp53 or CDKN2a).

High resolution image and legend (208K)

The CDKN2a locus is normally expressed at very low levels in most tissues of young organisms16. It is well established that the CDKN2a locus is activated during organismal ageing in both rodents and humans, and the levels of p16INK4a constitute an impressively good overall biomarker of ageing16, 17. Interestingly, strategies such as caloric restriction, which extend lifespan, also seem to reverse the age-dependent increase in p16INK4a transcription16, 18. The suggestion that p16INK4a is not just a marker but a true effector of ageing remains unproven; however, two independent lines of evidence seem to support this idea. First, a recent spurt of human genetic data indicates that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) near CDKN2a might be associated with ageing and age-related pathologies. Indeed, variants within or near CDKN2a were initially associated with overall physical frailty19 and, more recently, with certain known age-related conditions such as the risk of myocardial infarction20, 21. A second line of evidence has centred on the connection between p16INK4a and stem cell biology. Such a link was suspected on the basis of the analysis of mice that are deficient in certain Polycomb genes, which normally repress p16INK4a. These Polycomb-deficient animals seem to have severe defects in stem cell self-renewal22. Interestingly, age-induced expression of p16INK4a in adult stem cells seems to be associated with widespread impairment in tissue regeneration23, 24, 25. Further reinforcing this link, mice that lack p16INK4a have increased regenerative potential in diverse niches including the nervous system, the pancreas and the haematopoietic system. These observations point to p16INK4a both serving as a break for the proliferation of cancer cells, and also limiting the long-term renewal of stem cells. As such, excessive inhibition of pathways that are linked to cancer might reduce the robustness of various stem cell niches. In essence, cancer prevention might come at the expense of an accelerated decline in tissue regeneration and repair. Although such notions might seem depressing, as discussed below, it is important to note that not every strategy that could protect us from cancer comes at the expense of accelerating ageing.

Top

Telomeres and telomerase

Telomeres are specialized structures at the ends of chromosomes, which were first discovered by Barbara McClintock and Herman Müller in the 1930s on the basis of their ability to distinguish natural chromosome ends from broken chromosomes. Müller first termed these structures telomeres (from the Greek word for 'end part'). Telomeres protect natural chromosome ends from fusion events and are therefore essential for chromosomal stability. However, it was not until after the discovery of the structure of DNA that James Watson and Alexey Olovnikov realized that the replication of the very ends of chromosomes, or telomeres, would probably be impaired because conventional DNA polymerases needed a primer to initiate DNA synthesis. This problem came to be known as the 'end-replication problem' and its solution—or lack thereof—provides yet another link between cancer and ageing.

Molecular insight into the nature of telomeres was not gained until they were first sequenced in Tetrahymena thermophila by Joe Gall and Elizabeth Blackburn48. Telomeres were found to consist of tandem G-rich repeats that expanded until the chromosome end. Cloning of additional telomeres revealed that they are highly conserved in most eukaryotic organisms, with the exception of some flies. The identification of telomeres rapidly led to the realization that some cells could elongate pre-existing telomeres, implying the existence of telomere elongation mechanisms49. This telomere elongation was proposed to rely either on recombination events between telomeres or on the existence of a novel enzymatic activity that could synthesize telomere repeats de novo. Such an enzymatic activity was soon discovered by Carol Greider and Elizabeth Blackburn and was named telomerase50. A few years later, recombination mechanisms were also shown to maintain and elongate telomeres in the absence of telomerase, the so-called alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway51, 52.

Most adult cells have limiting amounts of telomerase that are not sufficient to prevent telomere loss, resulting in the shortening of telomeres with age53. As telomeres are essential for chromosomal stability, this progressive telomere loss was proposed to be at the basis of cellular senescence and ageing in the 'telomere hypothesis'53. Indeed, telomere length has been shown to predict the replicative capacity of human cells and the appearance of certain age-associated pathologies in humans54, 55. The final demonstration that telomere shortening was one of the causes of cellular senescence came from the observation that re-introduction of the TERT telomerase gene was sufficient to bypass replicative senescence and to confer immortal growth on a number of human primary cell lines56. Furthermore, the generation and characterization of the telomerase knockout mouse model has been instrumental in demonstrating that short telomeres result in multiple organismal defects caused by defective tissue regeneration57, 58, 59. In particular, telomerase-deficient mice with short telomeres show reduced function of various stem cell compartments including those in the bone marrow and skin58, 60. Interestingly, patients who have inherited or acquired genetic defects that limit telomere maintenance seem to be at substantially increased risk of a range of conditions including aplastic anaemia61, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis62, 63 and the rarer dyskeratosis congenita syndrome64 (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Revisiting the telomere hypothesis: role of telomeres in cancer and ageing.
Figure 2 : Revisiting the telomere hypothesis: role of telomeres in cancer and ageing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Normal somatic cells, including adult stem cells, suffer progressive telomere attrition coupled to cell division or to increasing age of the organism. This attrition has been proposed to contribute to multiple age-related pathologies. In germline cells, telomere shortening is attenuated owing to high levels of telomerase activity. By contrast, telomere shortening is accelerated in several human premature ageing syndromes, and patients with dyskeratosis congenita and aplastic anaemia show decreased telomerase activity and shortened telomeres owing to mutations in the TERC and TERT telomerase genes. Psychosocial and environmental factors such as perceived stress, social status, smoking and obesity have also been shown to accelerate telomere attrition. In contrast to normal somatic cells, most immortalized cultures cell lines and more than 95% of human tumours aberrantly activate telomerase to achieve immortal growth. Although telomerase activity has been shown to be rate-limiting for mouse ageing and lifespan, it is unknown whether increased telomerase activity will be able to extend the lifespan of organisms.

High resolution image and legend (157K)

It remains unclear whether increased telomerase activity can delay or prevent ageing phenotypes in the context of the whole organism. First generation mice lacking the telomerase RNA component Terc show a decrease in both their median and maximum lifespan, and these effects become more pronounced with each subsequent generation65. The increase in degenerative defects with each subsequent generation that is seen in the Terc-deficient mice is known as 'disease anticipation'. This phenomenon is also observed in some patients with dyskeratosis congenita, and is likely to be seen in patients with aplastic anaemia or pulmonary fibrosis due to telomerase deficiencies. As such, ageing or organ failure in these patients might ultimately result from the inheritance of both impaired telomere maintenance machinery and initially shortened telomeres. Conversely, these findings also support the fascinating idea that the manipulation of telomerase activity might increase the life span of mammals. One caveat to such an approach is the observation that increased telomerase activity in two independent Tert transgenic mouse models seemed to increase the susceptibility for tumour formation66, 67. In spite of their increased mortality due to cancer, these transgenic mice did show evidence of improved tissue regeneration as well as a slight increase in maximum life span68. Interestingly, Tert overexpression can also improve the ability of epidermal stem cells to regenerate the skin and the hair60, 69.

Over the last decade it has become clear that most human cancers activate telomerase at some point during tumorigenesis, while this activity is largely absent in most normal tissues70, 71. A significant number of human tumours can also maintain telomeres by recombination-based ALT mechanisms in the absence of telomerase72. By activating a program of telomere maintenance, tumour cells can escape from replicative senescence; this ability was undoubtedly essential for establishing the original HeLa cell line and for most, if not all, immortalized cells thereafter. Conversely, mice with short telomeres are resistant—with a few exceptions—to tumours73, arguing that telomere shortening represents a potent in vivo tumour suppressor mechanism.

Top

Autophagy and the cell biology of waste management

The ultimate disposition of cellular waste provides another area in which the biologies of cancer and ageing have merged. One particular area of overlap centres on a process known as autophagy. Originally described in yeast, macroautophagy is the process whereby old and damaged proteins and organelles, including mitochondria, are sequestered into double-membraned structures known as autophagosomes. The autophagosome can then fuse with the lysosome in mammalian cells—or with the vacuole in yeast—to further degrade the used cargo back to reusable building blocks. Genetic screens in yeast have identified more than 16 separate and well conserved genes that are required for autophagy to proceed74. Relatively little is known about what regulates the rate and selectivity of autophagy. One universal activator of autophagy is a decrease in nutrient availability and this stimulation occurs, at least in part, by the inhibition of TOR (target of rapamycin) signalling74.

Although the accumulation of damaged proteins and organelles is a hallmark of ageing and age-related diseases, the link between this process and cancer was, until recently, less clear. The first link between autophagy and cancer came with the observation that the product of the mammalian gene beclin 1 (Becn1), a homologue of the yeast autophagy gene VPS30 (also known as ATG6), bound to the human oncogene B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (BCL2)75. Furthermore, the binding of BCL2 to beclin seems to inhibit the autophagy program. This raised the interesting possibility that, in tumours characterized by increased BCL2 expression, the oncogene was working at least in part by suppressing autophagy. Further support of this notion came from mice engineered to have lost one copy of the Becn1 gene. In this case, the haploinsufficient mice developed tumours, indicating that autophagy might act as an important in vivo tumour suppressor76, 77. This notion is also supported by observations that in human malignancies the BECN1 locus is commonly deleted and by experimental evidence that several tumour suppressors, including the phosphatase and tensin homologue Pten and p53, stimulate autophagy78. Indeed, although the available evidence indicates that oncogenes can inhibit autophagy and tumour suppressors can stimulate it, the exact mechanistic link between cancer and autophagy remains obscure (Fig. 3). One possibility is that interfering with the normal degradation of organelles leads to the retention of older, damaged mitochondria that serve as a source for damaging reactive oxygen species. Such a mechanism would provide a strong connection between common insults that could both contribute to cancer and accelerate ageing.

Figure 3: The potential role of autophagy in cancer and ageing.
Figure 3 : The potential role of autophagy in cancer and ageing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Autophagy is a regulated process for the removal of damaged proteins and organelles. Autophagy occurs under basal conditions and is stimulated by environmental factors such as starvation. There is evidence that proteins that are linked to tumorigenesis can regulate the rate of autophagy, with oncogenes in general blocking and tumour suppressors stimulating the process. The removal of damaged cellular components, especially damaged mitochondria, might decrease the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn might reduce genomic instability or forestall cellular senescence. Such mechanisms might allow moderate increases in autophagy to reduce the incidence of cancer and prolong lifespan.

High resolution image and legend (90K)

Recent experiments using mouse knockouts of various autophagy genes have provided considerable insight into the normal physiological role of autophagy, and indicate that this process contributes to certain age-related pathologies. Mice lacking autophagy-related gene 5 (Atg5) are born normally but subsequently die within the first 24 h of life79. This death is a result of the inability of these mice to activate the macroautophagy program that is required for energy homeostasis immediately after birth. The short lifespan of these mice obviously precludes analysis of whether they also show accelerated ageing or a cancer predisposition phenotype. Nonetheless, two subsequent studies that used brain-specific conditional knockouts of Atg5 and Atg7 revealed that, in these animals, the absence of autophagy leads to a shortened lifespan and an accelerated form of age-related neuronal degeneration80, 81. Perhaps the strongest link between autophagy and ageing comes from experiments performed in C. elegans. In this organism, loss-of-function mutations in the daf-2 locus extend lifespan. In the worm, daf-2 is an insulin/IGF receptor that regulates not only lifespan but also entry into the alternative developmental pathway known as dauer. When developing worms are faced with unfavourable environmental conditions such as limited nutrients, they can enter a state akin to suspended hibernation known as the dauer diapause. Indeed, the environmental conditions that stimulate dauer entry and the conditions that stimulate autophagy are outwardly similar. Interestingly, both dauer formation and lifespan extension by daf-2 have been shown to require the worm orthologue of beclin82. Although these results are clearly informative, the role of autophagy in regulating lifespan in purely postmitotic organisms such as C. elegans might be considerably more important than in more complex, renewable mammalian systems where there is normally constant cellular proliferation and cell turnover.

Top

Henrietta's gift

The complexity of ageing and the biology of cancer do not lend themselves to easy generalizations. As we have discussed, in some instances, such as cellular senescence or telomere shortening, strategies that protect us from cancer might hasten our rate of ageing. In other situations, such as autophagy or protection from genomic instability, cancer and ageing seem to share common, rather than antagonistic, aetiologies. In the coming years, it is to be hoped that researchers will further discern how and where these two entities coalesce and where their mechanisms diverge. Indeed, most of the fundamental questions remain unanswered. Among these is whether DNA damage represents the ultimate stimulus to both cancer and ageing. If so, is it the damage itself or the subsequent response to DNA damage that fuels ageing? Similarly, does the steep age-related increase in cancer incidence suggest that cancer is just one of a host of age-related pathologies? Or do the 'superactive' p53 mouse and the recent data on stem-cell deletion of the p16INK4a tumour suppressor indicate that mechanisms that limit the growth of cancer cells will also be rate-limiting for normal stem cells? If the latter is true, will any strategy to increase our molecular vigilance against cancer always come at the expense of limiting tissue regeneration and maintenance? Alternatively, can we view cancer and ageing as pure stem cell diseases, with cancer representing the effect of additional growth promoting mutations within a given stem cell and ageing representing the natural exhaustion and depletion of the stem and progenitor pool (Fig. 5)? Finally, will a deeper understanding of the molecular control of energy sensing and utilization, including what regulates mitochondrial activity and how the nucleus, mitochondria and cytoplasm communicate, provide new and fundamental insights into how we age and how a cancer cell emerges?

Figure 5: A stem cell perspective on cancer and ageing.
Figure 5 : A stem cell perspective on cancer and ageing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

A simplified model that views ageing and cancer from the perspective of alterations within the stem and progenitor cell pool. Over the lifespan of an organism, long-lived cells (such as stem cells) accumulate DNA damage from a number of stresses including intracellular oxidants generated from normal metabolism. The default pathway for such damaged stem cells is to undergo growth arrest, apoptosis or senescence. As more and more stem cells withdraw from the proliferative pool, there is a decrease in the overall number and/or functionality of both stem and progenitor cells. This decrease predisposes the organism to impaired tissue homeostasis and regenerative capacity and could contribute to ageing and age-related pathologies. Presumably, some rare cells can escape from this normal default pathway by acquiring additional mutations that allow them to continue to proliferate even in the setting of damaged DNA. These proliferating but damaged cells might provide the seeds for future malignancies. In this scenario, both cancer and ageing result primarily from accumulating damage to the stem and progenitor cell compartment. Mutations that allow stem cells to continue to proliferate in the setting of normal growth arrest signals such as DNA damage (for example, loss of p16INK4a or reactivation of telomerase) would temporarily expand the stem cell pool and hence delay age-related pathologies. Over the long term, these mutations would also increase the likelihood of cancer.

High resolution image and legend (109K)

Undoubtedly, none of these questions were contemplated on that day in October 1951 when Henrietta Lacks's body was laid to rest in an unmarked grave near her family's small tobacco farm. Unbeknownst to those who gathered in that Virginia field—but as we now know—not all of Henrietta was buried that day. The small part that remained in the laboratory would forever change the course of science and help lead us to a clearer understanding of the barriers that separate normal cells from their cancer counterparts. These same barriers now appear to be intimately connected to how and why we age. Perhaps Henrietta's final gift to us is the growing realization that somewhere within the curse of the cancer cell's immortality there might also lie the secret of how we might understand and extend our own lifespan.

Top

References

  1. Hayflick, L. & Moorhead, P. S. The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 25, 585–621 (1961) | Article | ISI |
  2. Serrano, M., Hannon, G. J. & Beach, D. A new regulatory motif in cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. Nature 366, 704–707 (1993) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Alcorta, D. A. et al. Involvement of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16 (INK4a) in replicative senescence of normal human fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13742–13747 (1996) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Hara, E. et al. Regulation of p16CDKN2 expression and its implications for cell immortalization and senescence. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 859–867 (1996) | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Mooi, W. J. & Peeper, D. S. Oncogene-induced cell senescence—halting on the road to cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1037–1046 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Collado, M. & Serrano, M. The power and the promise of oncogene-induced senescence markers. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 472–476 (2006) | Article |
  7. Bracken, A. P. et al. The Polycomb group proteins bind throughout the INK4AARF locus and are disassociated in senescent cells. Genes Dev. 21, 525–530 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  8. Bartkova, J. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints. Nature 444, 633–637 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  9. Di Micco, R. et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature 444, 638–642 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Xue, W. et al. Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas. Nature 445, 656–660 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Ventura, A. et al. Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo. Nature 445, 661–665 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Roninson, I. B. Tumor cell senescence in cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 63, 2705–2715 (2003) | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  13. Gasser, S., Orsulic, S., Brown, E. J. & Raulet, D. H. The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature 436, 1186–1190 (2005) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  14. Dimri, G. P. et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9363–9367 (1995) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  15. Herbig, U., Ferreira, M., Condel, L., Carey, D. & Sedivy, J. M. Cellular senescence in aging primates. Science 311, 1257 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  16. Krishnamurthy, J. et al. Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging. J. Clin. Invest. 114, 1299–1307 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Kim, W. Y. & Sharpless, N. E. The regulation of INK4/ARF in cancer and aging. Cell 127, 265–275 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Edwards, M. G. et al. Gene expression profiling of aging reveals activation of a p53-mediated transcriptional program. BMC Genomics 8, 80 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  19. Melzer, D. et al. A common variant of the p16(INK4a) genetic region is associated with physical function in older people. Mech. Ageing Dev. published online 27 March 2007 (doi: doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2007.03.005). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  20. McPherson, R. et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science 316, 1488–1491 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  21. Helgadottir, A. et al. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science 316, 1491–1493 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Valk-Lingbeek, M. E., Bruggeman, S. W. & van Lohuizen, M. Stem cells and cancer: the polycomb connection. Cell 118, 409–418 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Janzen, V. et al. Stem-cell ageing modified by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16INK4a. Nature 443, 421–426 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  24. Krishnamurthy, J. et al. p16INK4a induces an age-dependent decline in islet regenerative potential. Nature 443, 453–457 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Molofsky, A. V. et al. Increasing p16INK4a expression decreases forebrain progenitors and neurogenesis during ageing. Nature 443, 448–452 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  26. McMurray, M. A. & Gottschling, D. E. An age-induced switch to a hyperrecombinational state. Science 301, 1908–1911 (2003) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  27. Curtis, H. J. Biological mechanisms underlying the aging process. Science 141, 686–694 (1963) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  28. Bahar, R. et al. Increased cell-to-cell variation in gene expression in ageing mouse heart. Nature 441, 1011–1014 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  29. Tyner, S. D. et al. p53 mutant mice that display early ageing-associated phenotypes. Nature 415, 45–53 (2002) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Maier, B. et al. Modulation of mammalian life span by the short isoform of p53. Genes Dev. 18, 306–319 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  31. Garcia-Cao, I. et al. "Super p53" mice exhibit enhanced DNA damage response, are tumor resistant and age normally. EMBO J. 21, 6225–6235 (2002) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  32. Matheu, A. et al. Delayed ageing through damage protection by the Arf/p53 pathway. Nature 448, 375–379 (2007) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  33. Pinkston, J. M., Garigan, D., Hansen, M. & Kenyon, C. Mutations that increase the life span of C. elegans inhibit tumor growth. Science 313, 971–975 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  34. Ito, K. et al. Regulation of oxidative stress by ATM is required for self-renewal of haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 431, 997–1002 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  35. Cao, L., Li, W., Kim, S., Brodie, S. G. & Deng, C. X. Senescence, aging, and malignant transformation mediated by p53 in mice lacking the Brca1 full-length isoform. Genes Dev. 17, 201–213 (2003) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Baker, D. J. et al. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nature Genet. 36, 744–749 (2004) | Article |
  37. Baker, D. J. et al. Early aging-associated phenotypes in Bub3/Rae1 haploinsufficient mice. J. Cell Biol. 172, 529–540 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  38. de Boer, J. et al. Premature aging in mice deficient in DNA repair and transcription. Science 296, 1276–1279 (2002) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  39. Niedernhofer, L. J. et al. A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis. Nature 444, 1038–1043 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  40. Lombard, D. B. et al. DNA repair, genome stability, and aging. Cell 120, 497–512 (2005) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  41. Opresko, P. L. et al. The Werner syndrome helicase and exonuclease cooperate to resolve telomeric D loops in a manner regulated by TRF1 and TRF2. Mol. Cell 14, 763–774 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  42. Agrelo, R. et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the premature aging Werner syndrome gene in human cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8822–8827 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  43. Liu, B. et al. Genomic instability in laminopathy-based premature aging. Nature Med. 11, 780–785 (2005) | Article |
  44. Haigis, M. C. & Guarente, L. P. Mammalian sirtuins—emerging roles in physiology, aging, and calorie restriction. Genes Dev. 20, 2913–2921 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  45. Vaquero, A. et al. Human SirT1 interacts with histone H1 and promotes formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mol. Cell 16, 93–105 (2004) | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  46. Pruitt, K. et al. Inhibition of SIRT1 reactivates silenced cancer genes without loss of promoter DNA hypermethylation. PLoS Genet. 2, e40 (2006) | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  47. Mostoslavsky, R. et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell 124, 315–329 (2006) |