Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 446, 611 (5 April 2007) | doi:10.1038/446611b; Published online 4 April 2007
nature jobs
Academic Surgical Pathologists GI / Breast / GYN
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
John Innes Centre Project Leader in Plant or Microbial Sciences
- University of East Anglia
- Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Authors defend study that shows high Iraqi death toll
Les Roberts1 & Gilbert Burnham1
- Program on Forced Migration and Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA
- Center for Refugee and Disaster Response, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
In our opinion, your News story about our Lancet paper "Death toll in Iraq: survey team takes on new critics" (Nature 446, 6–7; 2007) has confused the matter rather than clarified it. You outline three criticisms of our work: that there was not enough time to have conducted the survey; that the sampling method suffered from a 'main-street bias'; and that the study team fabricated the data (the last being attributed to anonymous "researchers").
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Nucleosome remodeling at the IL-12 p40 promoter is a TLR-dependent, Rel-independent eventNature Immunology Article (01 Jan 2001)

