FIGURE 1. Structure and schematic dynamics of the two networks considered.

From the following article:

Quantifying social group evolution

Gergely Palla, Albert-László Barabási & Tamás Vicsek

Nature 446, 664-667(5 April 2007)

doi:10.1038/nature05670

BACK TO ARTICLE

a, The co-authorship network. The figure shows the local community structure at a given time step in the vicinity of a randomly selected node. b, As a but for the phone-call network. c, The filled black symbols correspond to the average size of the largest subset of members with the same zip-code, left fencenrealright fence, in the phone-call communities divided by the same quantity found in random sets, left fencenrandright fence, as a function of the community size, s. Similarly, the open symbols show the average size of the largest subset of community members with an age falling in a three-year time window, divided by the same quantity in random sets. The error bars in both cases correspond to left fencenrealright fence/(left fencenrandright fence + sigmarand) and left fencenrealright fence/(left fencenrandright fence - sigmarand), where sigmarand is the standard deviation in the case of the random sets. d, The left fencenrealright fence/s as a function of s, for both the zip-code (filled black symbols) and the age (open symbols). e, Possible events in community evolution. f, The identification of evolving communities. The links at t (blue) and the links at t + 1 (yellow) are merged into a joint graph (green). Any CPM community at t or t + 1 is part of a CPM community in the joined graph, so these can be used to match the two sets of communities.

Figures & Tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE