Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Commentary
Nature 446, 137-138 (8 March 2007) | doi:10.1038/446137a; Published online 7 March 2007
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
nature jobs
Gastroenterologist
- Gastrointestinal Diseases Inc.
- Georgia, USA
Senior Scientist, Cellular & Molecular Pharmacology
- Cortex Search Inc.
- Vancouver, British Columbia
Keeping faith with trial volunteers
Martine Piccart1, Aron Goldhirsch1, William Wood2, Kathleen Pritchard3, José Baselga4, Linda Reaby5, Ingrid Kössler6, Stella Kyriakides6, Larry Norton7 & Alan Coates8
- Martine Piccart and Aron Goldhirsch are at the Breast International Group.
- The Breast Cancer Intergroup
- The Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group
- Grupo Espanol de Estudio y Tratamiento Tumores Solidos
- The Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group Consumer Advisory Panel
- The European Breast Cancer Coalition
- The Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- The International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Abstract
How best to serve patients' interests in large clinical trials? Martine Piccart, Aron Goldhirsch and their colleagues argue that maintaining academic independence is essential to early breast cancer trials.
How do patients who sign up for clinical trials know that the right questions are being asked and that the data support the reported answers to these questions? For many patient groups, transparency in study design, data collection and analysis, and full publication of results are issues of paramount importance.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).

