Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Evolutionary Biology

Evidence for sympatric speciation?

Abstract

Arising from: M. Barluenga, K. N. Stölting, W. Salzburger, M. Muschick & A. Meyer Nature 439, 719–723 (2006); Barluenga et al. reply

Sympatric speciation is difficult to demonstrate in nature and remains a hotly debated issue. Barluenga et al.1 present a case of putative sympatric speciation for two cichlid species in the Nicaraguan crater lake Apoyo, but they overlook or reinterpret some key published information on the system. Although sympatric speciation is possible in theory2,3, we show here that, when this information is taken into account, the results of Barluenga et al.1 do not provide conclusive evidence for sympatric speciation: this is because the null hypothesis of multiple invasion with introgression cannot be rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Contrasting information in two identical haplotype networks of Nicaragua cichlids.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barluenga, M., Stölting, K. N., Salzburger, W., Muschick, M. & Meyer, A. Nature 439, 719–723 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, H. & Tautz, D. Adaptive Speciation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gavrilets, S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species. Monographs in Population Biology 41 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barluenga, M. & Meyer, A. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2061–2076 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, E. B. & McPhail, J. D. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2375–2384 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernatchez, L. et al. Can. J. Fish. Aqu. Sci. 52, 179–185 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seehausen, O. Trends Evol. Ecol. 19, 198–207 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKaye, K. R. et al. Cuadernos de Investigación de la UCA 12, 19–47 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stauffer, J. R. & McKaye, K. R. & Stauffer, J. R. Cuadernos de Investigación de la UCA 12, 1–18 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Machado, C. A. et al. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 472–488 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schliewen, U. K. & Klee, B. Front. Zool. 1, doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-1-5 (2004).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. K. Schliewen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schliewen, U., Kocher, T., McKaye, K. et al. Evidence for sympatric speciation?. Nature 444, E12–E13 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05419

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05419

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing