Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Article
Nature 444, 718-723 (7 December 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature05229; Received 22 June 2006; Accepted 31 August 2006
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods to Analyze Consumer Emotions
The Seeker is looking for methods to analyze consumer emotions. This Challenge requires only a writ...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
nature jobs
Chemical Process Engineer
- Praj Matrix - Praj Industries Ltd
- Pune, Maharashtra Pune-411021 India
Tenure-Track Position in Chemistry, Instructor Level I
- University of British Columbia
- Vancouver, BC Canada
The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment
Bettina Rockenbach1 & Manfred Milinski2
- Department of Economics, University of Erfurt, Nordhäuser Stra
e 63, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany - Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max-Planck-Institute of Limnology, August-Thienemann-Stra
e 2, D-24306 Plön, Germany
Correspondence to: Bettina Rockenbach1Manfred Milinski2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.R. (Email: bettina.rockenbach@uni-erfurt.de) or M.M. (Email: milinski@mpil-ploen.mpg.de).
Abstract
Human cooperation in social dilemmas challenges researchers from various disciplines. Here we combine advances in experimental economics and evolutionary biology that separately have shown that costly punishment and reputation formation, respectively, induce cooperation in social dilemmas. The mechanisms of punishment and reputation, however, substantially differ in their means for 'disciplining' non-cooperators. Direct punishment incurs salient costs for both the punisher and the punished, whereas reputation mechanisms discipline by withholding action, immediately saving costs for the 'punisher'. Consequently, costly punishment may become extinct in environments in which effective reputation building—for example, through indirect reciprocity—provides a cheaper and powerful way to sustain cooperation. Unexpectedly, as we show here, punishment is maintained when a combination with reputation building is available, however, at a low level. Costly punishment acts are markedly reduced although not simply substituted by appreciating reputation. Indeed, the remaining punishment acts are concentrated on free-riders, who are most severely punished in the combination. When given a choice, subjects even prefer a combination of reputation building with costly punishment. The interaction between punishment and reputation building boosts cooperative efficiency. Because punishment and reputation building are omnipresent interacting forces in human societies, costly punishing should appear less destructive without losing its deterring force.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Climate change All in the gameNature News and Views (01 Jun 2006)
Behavioural science Homo reciprocansNature News and Views (10 Jan 2002)
See all 10 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Volunteering leads to rock?paper?scissors dynamics in a public goods gameNature Letters to Editor (25 Sep 2003)
Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problemNature Letters to Editor (25 Nov 2004)
See all 24 matches for Research
