Nature 442, 854-855 (24 August 2006) | doi:10.1038/442854a; Published online 23 August 2006

Oceans cool off in hottest years

Quirin Schiermeier

Temperature drop puzzles climate researchers.

Oceans cool off in hottest years


Cool blue: increased cloud cover may mean less Sun is getting to the world's oceans.

Ocean measurements suggest the world's seas have cooled substantially during some of the warmest years in recent history. If real, the dip is likely to reflect a short-term fluctuation in an ocean that is warming overall, say climate scientists.

The years 2003 and 2005 saw the highest global average surface temperatures in more than a century. An upcoming paper in Geophysical Research Letters reports that during this period, the upper 750 metres of the oceans lost around one-fifth of the heat accumulated over the past 50 years.

But don't read too much into that, oceanographers warn. "Cooling on a short-term scale doesn't challenge the long-term warming trend," says Sydney Levitus, director of the World Data Center for Oceanography in Silver Spring, Maryland. "What it does tell us is that we still don't sufficiently understand how the global climate system works."

Oceans cover two-thirds of Earth's surface and have far more heat-storing capacity than air or land. Overall, they have warmed in recent decades. Between 1955 and 1998, for example, all of the world's oceans, down to a depth of 3,000 metres, warmed by 0.037 °C (S. Levitus, J. Antonov and T. Boyer Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L02604; 2005).

But that warming has not proceeded steadily. The trend has reversed for a few years at least once during the past half century. In fact, a drop in temperature that occurred between 1980 and 1983 was almost twice as pronounced as the current cooling.

But only for this latest cooling episode have oceanographers obtained good enough global data to provide a convincing argument that the effect is real. The report relies in part on data gathered by ARGO, a global array of 2,500 floats. The ARGO floats descend to various depths to probe ocean temperature and salinity, and surface occasionally to transmit their data via satellites.

When ARGO data were removed from the analysis, the cooling was significantly less pronounced, and the error bars became larger, say the authors of the report, led by John Lyman of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Seattle, Washington. Some researchers suspect that ARGO has provided the ability to detect short-term temperature fluctuations. "We may be seeing different things just because we are looking harder," says Brian King, a physical oceanographer at the Southampton Oceanography Centre, UK.

We may be seeing different things just because we are looking harder.

Better observation systems are showing the oceans are more changeable than some people thought, says Gavin Schmidt, a climate modeller at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. A short-term cooling blip can't say much about the climate system in general. But the latest study suggests, he says, that coupled ocean–climate models fail to adequately capture intermittent fluctuations in ocean temperature.

In theory, the recent cooling should have led to a 2-millimetre drop in sea level due to the thermal contraction of water, which becomes denser at lower temperatures. But satellites have measured a steady rise in sea level between 1993 and 2005 — years covered by the study. For the observations to be reconciled, melting ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland must be contributing far more to sea-level rise than previously suspected, says Schmidt.

Of course, much of the observed ocean-temperature decrease could be an artefact of sampling, says Tim Barnett, a climate researcher at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California. For example, if warmer water has simply redistributed to areas where fewer ARGO floats exist, the net cooling could be smaller than the data suggest.

But assuming the trend is real, what caused the cooling and where did the heat go? Aerosols, volcanic activity and small changes in ocean circulations and convection processes may all play a role, says King. But the simplest explanation is that less sunlight has reached the ocean surface as cloud coverage has increased.


Global cloud coverage has increased by 1–2% since 1999 according to data from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, presumably because of global warming and increased evaporation. Other factors — such as cloud albedo (the extent to which cloud reflects solar radiation) or cloud-top temperature — might have changed in the same period, says William Rossow, a cloud expert at the Goddard Institute. "It is completely insufficient to look for a simple explanation of a short-term temperature change," he says, "as the climate system is much more complex."

The heat itself could be hidden at greater depths in the ocean, or — more likely, says Schmidt — it may have escaped into the atmosphere and out into space. Yet a corresponding change in Earth's radiation budget has not been observed.

"The system's internal variability might well be larger than we thought," says Levitus. "This is exciting news, but food for global-warming sceptics it is not."

Extra navigation