Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 442, 195-198 (13 July 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04968; Received 1 March 2006; Accepted 16 May 2006
nature jobs
Director of NMR
- New York Structural Biology Center
- New York, New York
Research Scientist in Lipids Adulteration
- Nestle Research Center
- Lausanne 1026 Switzerland
A high-performance brain–computer interface
Gopal Santhanam1,5, Stephen I. Ryu1,2,5, Byron M. Yu1, Afsheen Afshar1,3 & Krishna V. Shenoy1,4
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 330 Serra Mall, 319 Paul G. Allen Center for Integrated Systems Annex, Stanford, California 94305-4075, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Building, R-297, Stanford, California 94305-5327, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, 251 Campus Drive, MSOB 309, Stanford, California 94305-5404, USA
- Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
- *These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to: Krishna V. Shenoy1,4 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.V.S. (Email: shenoy@stanford.edu).
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated that monkeys1, 2, 3, 4 and humans5, 6, 7, 8, 9 can use signals from the brain to guide computer cursors. Brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) may one day assist patients suffering from neurological injury or disease, but relatively low system performance remains a major obstacle. In fact, the speed and accuracy with which keys can be selected using BCIs is still far lower than for systems relying on eye movements. This is true whether BCIs use recordings from populations of individual neurons using invasive electrode techniques1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 or electroencephalogram recordings using less-6 or non-invasive9 techniques. Here we present the design and demonstration, using electrode arrays implanted in monkey dorsal premotor cortex, of a manyfold higher performance BCI than previously reported9, 10. These results indicate that a fast and accurate key selection system, capable of operating with a range of keyboard sizes, is possible (up to 6.5 bits per second, or
15 words per minute, with 96 electrodes). The highest information throughput is achieved with unprecedentedly brief neural recordings, even as recording quality degrades over time. These performance results and their implications for system design should substantially increase the clinical viability of BCIs in humans.
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 330 Serra Mall, 319 Paul G. Allen Center for Integrated Systems Annex, Stanford, California 94305-4075, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Edwards Building, R-297, Stanford, California 94305-5327, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, 251 Campus Drive, MSOB 309, Stanford, California 94305-5404, USA
- Neurosciences Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
- *These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence to: Krishna V. Shenoy1,4 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to K.V.S. (Email: shenoy@stanford.edu).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Cortical-based neuroprosthetics: when less may be moreNature Neuroscience News and Views (01 Nov 2008)
RESEARCH
A CD14-independent LPS receptor clusterNature Immunology Article (01 Apr 2001)
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegiaNature Article (13 Jul 2006)
See all 8 matches for Research