Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors

Abstract

Solution-processed electronic1 and optoelectronic2,3,4,5 devices offer low cost, large device area, physical flexibility and convenient materials integration compared to conventional epitaxially grown, lattice-matched, crystalline semiconductor devices. Although the electronic or optoelectronic performance of these solution-processed devices is typically inferior to that of those fabricated by conventional routes, this can be tolerated for some applications in view of the other benefits. Here we report the fabrication of solution-processed infrared photodetectors that are superior in their normalized detectivity (D*, the figure of merit for detector sensitivity) to the best epitaxially grown devices operating at room temperature. We produced the devices in a single solution-processing step, overcoating a prefabricated planar electrode array with an unpatterned layer of PbS colloidal quantum dot nanocrystals. The devices showed large photoconductive gains with responsivities greater than 103 A W-1. The best devices exhibited a normalized detectivity D* of 1.8 × 1013 jones (1 jones = 1 cm Hz1/2 W-1) at 1.3 µm at room temperature: today's highest performance infrared photodetectors are photovoltaic devices made from epitaxially grown InGaAs that exhibit peak D* in the 1012 jones range at room temperature, whereas the previous record for D* from a photoconductive detector lies at 1011 jones. The tailored selection of absorption onset energy through the quantum size effect, combined with deliberate engineering of the sequence of nanoparticle fusing and surface trap functionalization, underlie the superior performance achieved in this readily fabricated family of devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Device structure and electro-optic characteristics for device classes investigated.
Figure 2: Noise characteristics and resultant normalized detectivity of the different device classes investigated.
Figure 3: Photodetector performance characteristics of the highest-sensitivity class of devices.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talapin, D. & Murray, C. B. PbSe nanocrystal solids for n- and p-channel thin film field-effect transistors. Science 310, 86–89 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tessler, N., Medvedev, V., Kazes, M., Kan, S. & Banin, U. Efficient near-infrared polymer nanocrystal light-emitting diodes. Science 295, 1506–1508 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Konstantatos, G., Huang, C., Levina, L., Lu, Z. & Sargent, E. H. Efficient infrared electroluminescent devices using solution-processed colloidal quantum dots. Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1865–1869 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoogland, S. et al. A solution-processed 1.53 µm quantum dot laser with temperature-invariant emission wavelength. Opt. Express 14, 3273–3281 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald, S. A. et al. Solution-processed PbS quantum dot infrared photodetectors and photovoltaics. Nature Mater. 4, 138–142 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schödel, R. et al. A star in a 15.2-year orbit around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way. Nature 419, 694–696 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rawlings, S. et al. A radio galaxy at redshift 4.41. Nature 383, 502–505 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettl, R., Chao, I., Diederich, F. & Whetten, R. L. Isolation of C76, a chiral (D2) allotrope of carbon. Nature 353, 149–153 (1991)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker, J. Tunable alkali halide lasers. Nature 256, 695 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ettenberg, M. A little night vision. Adv. Imaging 20, 29–32 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sargent, E. H. Infrared quantum dots. Adv. Mater. 17, 515–522 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim1, Y. T. et al. Selection of quantum dot wavelengths for biomedical assays and imaging. Mol. Imaging 2, 50–64 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, S. et al. Near-infrared fluorescent type II quantum dots for sentinel lymph node mapping. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 93–97 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petritz, R. L. Theory of photoconductivity in semiconductor films. Phys. Rev. B 104, 1508–1516 (1956)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carbone, A. & Mazzetti, P. Grain-boundary effects on photocurrent fluctuations in polycrystalline photoconductors. Phys. Rev. B 57, 2454–2460 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray, C. B., Norris, D. J. & Bawendi, M. G. Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E = sulfur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 8706–8715 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, D., Wang, C. & Guyot-Sionnest, P. n-Type conducting CdSe nanocrystal solids. Science 300, 1277–1280 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wessels, J. M. et al. Optical and electrical properties of three-dimensional interlinked gold nanoparticle assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3349–3356 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leatherdale, C. A. et al. Photoconductivity in CdSe quantum dot solids. Phys. Rev. B 62, 2669–2680 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarosz, M. V., Porter, V. J., Fisher, B. R., Kastner, M. A. & Bawendi, M. G. Photoconductivity of treated CdSe quantum dot films exhibiting increased exciton ionization efficiency. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195327 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Oertel, D. C., Bawendi, M. G., Arango, A. C. & Bulovic, V. Photodetectors based on treated CdSe quantum-dot films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 213505 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hines, M. A. & Scholes, G. D. Colloidal PbS nanocrystals with size-tunable near-infrared emission: observation of post-synthesis self-narrowing of the particle size distribution. Adv. Mater. 15, 1844–1849 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu, D., Wang, C., Wehrenberg, B. L. & Guyot-Sionnest, P. Variable range hopping mechanism in semiconductor nanocrystal solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 216802 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahada, R. H. & Minden, H. T. Photosensitization of PbS films. Phys. Rev. 102, 1258–1262 (1956)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scher, H. Anomalous transit-time dispersion in amorphous solids. Phys. Rev. B 12, 2455–2477 (1975)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Grozea and Z. H. Lu for XPS, E. Istrate for discussions, and V. Sukhovatkin for assistance in optical measurements. This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Province of Ontario, and the Canada Research Chairs programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward H. Sargent.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

This file contains Supplementary Notes 1–7. (DOC 915 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konstantatos, G., Howard, I., Fischer, A. et al. Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors. Nature 442, 180–183 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04855

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04855

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing