Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 441, 975-978 (22 June 2006) | doi:10.1038/nature04755; Received 31 January 2006; Accepted 22 March 2006
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
nature jobs
Tier II Canada Research Chair in Cellular Science and Human Health
- Concordia University
- Montreal, Quebec Canada
Head-Preclinical
- Syngene International
- Bangalore, Karnataka 560099 India
Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism
Redouan Bshary1 & Alexandra S. Grutter2
- University of Neuchâtel, Department of Zoology, Rue Emile-Argand 11, Case postale 158, 2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- University of Queensland, School of Integrative Biology, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia
Correspondence to: Redouan Bshary1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.B. (Email: redouan.bshary@unine.ch).
Abstract
Humans are highly social animals and often help unrelated individuals that may never reciprocate the altruist's favour1, 2, 3, 4, 5. This apparent evolutionary puzzle may be explained by the altruist's gain in social image: image-scoring bystanders, also known as eavesdroppers, notice the altruistic act and therefore are more likely to help the altruist in the future5, 6, 7. Such complex indirect reciprocity based on altruistic acts may evolve only after simple indirect reciprocity has been established, which requires two steps. First, image scoring evolves when bystanders gain personal benefits from information gathered, for example, by finding cooperative partners8, 9, 10. Second, altruistic behaviour in the presence of such bystanders may evolve if altruists benefit from access to the bystanders. Here, we provide experimental evidence for both of the requirements in a cleaning mutualism involving the cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus. These cleaners may cooperate and remove ectoparasites from clients or they may cheat by feeding on client mucus11, 12. As mucus may be preferred over typical client ectoparasites13, clients must make cleaners feed against their preference to obtain a cooperative service. We found that eavesdropping clients spent more time next to 'cooperative' than 'unknown cooperative level' cleaners, which shows that clients engage in image-scoring behaviour. Furthermore, trained cleaners learned to feed more cooperatively when in an 'image-scoring' than in a 'non-image-scoring' situation.
- University of Neuchâtel, Department of Zoology, Rue Emile-Argand 11, Case postale 158, 2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- University of Queensland, School of Integrative Biology, St Lucia QLD 4072, Australia
Correspondence to: Redouan Bshary1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.B. (Email: redouan.bshary@unine.ch).
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Animal behaviour Trust in fishNature News and Views (22 Jun 2006)
news and views in briefNature News and Views (30 Jan 2003)
See all 4 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletonsNature Letters to Editor (16 Oct 2008)
Cleaner fish really do cleanNature Scientific Correspondence (22 Apr 1999)
Animal mimicry Choosing when to be a cleaner-fish mimicNature Brief Communication (20 Jan 2005)
See all 4 matches for Research
