Five new contributions to Nature 's online debate about open peer review are published today.
Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal
Thomas Koop and Ulrich Pöschl
Technical solutions: Wisdom of the crowds
Chris Anderson
Quality and value: Statistics in peer review
David Ozonoff
Ethics: What is it for?
Elizabeth Wager
Perspective: The pros and cons of open peer review
Thomas DeCoursey
All articles are available at:
Readers are invited to join the debate in Nature's peer-review comments blog at:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Open peer-review debate. Nature 441, xi (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/7095xic
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/7095xic