Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis

Abstract

In the Soa Basin of central Flores, eastern Indonesia, stratified archaeological sites, including Mata Menge, Boa Lesa and Kobatuwa (Fig. 1), contain stone artefacts associated with the fossilized remains of Stegodon florensis, Komodo dragon, rat and various other taxa. These sites have been dated to 840–700 kyr bp (thousand years before present)1. The authenticity of the Soa Basin artefacts and their provenance have been demonstrated by previous work2,3,4,5,6, but to quell lingering doubts7, here we describe the context, attributes and production modes of 507 artefacts excavated at Mata Menge. We also note specific similarities, and apparent technological continuity, between the Mata Menge stone artefacts and those excavated from Late Pleistocene levels at Liang Bua cave, 50 km to the west. The latter artefacts, dated to between 95–74 and 12 kyr ago8,9, are associated with the remains of a dwarfed descendent of S. florensis, Komodo dragon, rat and a small-bodied hominin species, Homo floresiensis, which had a brain size of about 400 cubic centimetres10,11. The Mata Menge evidence negates claims that stone artefacts associated with H. floresiensis are so complex that they must have been made by modern humans (Homo sapiens)7.

1, Kobatuwa; 2, Mata Menge; 3, Lembahmenge; 4, Boa Lesa; 5, Ola Bula; 6, Tangi Talo; 7, Wolo Milo; 8, Wolokeo; 9, Sagala; 10, Dozu Dhalu; 11, Kopowatu; 12, Ngamapa; 13, Pauphadhi; 14, Deko Weko; 15, Malahuma. The dashed areas indicated with a V represent volcanoes. The broken line indicates the approximate boundary of the Ae Sissa River drainage basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 2: Stratigraphic profiles and excavations at Mata Menge.
Figure 3: Stone artefacts from Mata Menge.
Figure 4: Perforators from Mata Menge and Liang Bua.
Figure 5: Scar dimensions on Mata Menge and Liang Bua cores.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Sullivan, P. B. et al. Archaeological implications of the geology and chronology of the Soa basin, Flores, Indonesia. Geology 29, 607–610 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maringer, J. & Verhoeven, Th. Die steinartefakte aus der Stegodon-fossilschicht von Mengeruda auf Flores, Indonesien. Anthropos 65, 229–247 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sondaar, P. Y. et al. Middle Pleistocene faunal turn-over and colonisation of Flores (Indonesia) by Homo erectus. C.R. Acad. Sci. 319, 1255–1262 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morwood, M. J., O'Sullivan, P. B., Aziz, F. & Raza, A. Fission-track ages of stone tools and fossils on the east Indonesian island of Flores. Nature 392, 173–176 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morwood, M. J. et al. Archaeological and palaeontological research in central Flores, east Indonesia: results of fieldwork 1997–98. Antiquity 73, 273–286 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morwood, M. J., Aziz, F., van den Bergh, G. D., Sondaar, P. Y. & de Vos, J. Stone artefacts from the 1994 excavation at Mata Menge, west central Flores, Indonesia. Aust. Archaeol. 44, 26–34 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lahr, M. M. & Foley, R. Human evolution writ small. Nature 431, 1043–1044 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morwood, M. J. et al. Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431, 1087–1091 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morwood, M. J. et al. Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 437, 1012–1017 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, P. et al. A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431, 1055–1061 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Falk, D. et al. The brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis. Science 308, 242–245 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Bergh, G. D. The Late Neogene elephantoid-bearing faunas of Indonesia and their palaeozoogeographic implications: a study of the terrestrial faunal succession of Sulawesi, Flores, and Java, including evidence for early hominid dispersal east of Wallace's Line. Scripta Geol. 117, 1–419 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schick, K. D. Stone Age Sites in the Making: Experiments in the Formation and Transformation of Archaeological Occurrences (BAR International Series 319, Oxford, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shea, J. J. Artifact abrasion, fluvial processes, and “living floors” from the Early Paleolithic site of ’Ubeidiya (Jordan Valley, Israel). Geoarchaeology 14, 191–207 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maringer, J. & Verhoeven, Th. Notes on stone artefacts in the National Archaeology Institute of Indonesia at Djakarta, collected from the Stegodon-fossil bed at Boaleza in Flores. Anthropos 65, 638–639 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, M. W. The Design Space of Lithic Technology. Thesis, Univ. New England (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Culotta, E. New ‘hobbits’ bolster species, but origins still a mystery. Science 310, 208–209 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Excavations at Mata Menge, funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery grant to M.J.M, were undertaken from 26 August to 29 September 2004 and 16 August to 23 September 2005. The work was done under GRDC survey/research permission letter 57/45.04/BMG/2004 to the Governor of NTT Province, Kupang. We received support from the Ngadha Regency Administration and Head of the Bajawa Culture and Tourism Office, I. Yusuf. Other participants included P. M. D. Moi, I. Botha, E. Yan Patriani, S. Sudjarwadi and 20 Ngadha people led by K. Podhi. The Secretary of Desa Mengeruda, G. Leo, provided further support. We also thank Ngaliman and Dadang for preparing the topographic map of the Mata Menge area, and J. Tode Solo for assistance in the field. The Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University funded A.B. S. O'Connor and D. Boyd are thanked for their support. Author Contributions A.B. conducted the analysis and interpretation of the Mata Menge assemblage. F.A. and G.D.v.d.B. planned and directed the excavations in association with M.J.M. G.D.v.d.B. described the stratigraphy and prepared Fig. 2. D.R.H. was responsible for aspects of the archaeological fieldwork and prepared Fig. 1. I.K. assisted with the palaeontological research. M.W.M. assisted with the Mata Menge analysis, conducted the Liang Bua analysis and prepared Figs 35. R.F. conducted the microwear analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Adam Brumm or Mark W. Moore.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

This file contains Supplementary Figures and Legends, Supplementary Table and Supplementary Methods. This file contains information about the Mata Menge excavations and the stratigraphic context of the faunal assemblage. Further technological and statistical data are also provided, along with the methods and results of the microwear study. (PDF 1109 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumm, A., Aziz, F., van den Bergh, G. et al. Early stone technology on Flores and its implications for Homo floresiensis. Nature 441, 624–628 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04618

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04618

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing