FIGURE 4. Interactions and local fields in networks of different size.

From the following article:

Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population

Elad Schneidman, Michael J. Berry, II, Ronen Segev and William Bialek

Nature 440, 1007-1012 (20 April 2006)

doi:10.1038/nature04701

BACK TO ARTICLE

a, Greyscale density map of the distribution of effective interaction fields experienced by a single cell hiint versus its own bias or local field hi (see the text); distribution formed over network configurations at each point in time during a natural movie for n = 1,140 3-cell groups (top panel) and n = 250 10-cell groups (bottom panel). Black line shows the boundary between dominance of local fields versus interactions. b, Mean interactions Jij and local fields hi describing groups of N cells, with error bars showing standard deviations across multiple groups. c, Pairwise interaction in a network of 10 cells Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com(10) plotted against the interaction values of the same pair in a sub-network containing only 5 cells Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com(5). Line shows equality.

Figures & Tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE