Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 439, 782 (16 February 2006) | doi:10.1038/439782c; Published online 15 February 2006
Open Innovation Challenges
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Research Associate
- Rice University
- Houston, Texas, USA
Scientist (Bioinformatics)
- Polyclone Bioservices Pvt. Ltd
- Bangalore India
Peer review could be improved by market forces
Klaus Jaffe1
- Laboratorio de Comportamiento, Universidad Simön Bolívar, Apartado 89000, Caracas 1080, Venezuela
Although peer review seems the best system for quality control of scientific publications and grant proposals ("Three cheers for peers" Nature 439, 118; 2006), we might try to improve it. Market forces are known to optimize complex systems where multiple players have conflicting interests.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
A new member of the IL-1 receptor family highly expressed in hippocampus and involved in X-linked mental retardationNature Genetics Article (01 Sep 1999)
Temporal changes in allele frequency, genetic variation and inbreeding depression in small populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulataHeredity Original Article
Grants awarded on the basis of political criteriaNature Correspondence (24 Jan 2008)
Venezuelan government is backing scienceNature Correspondence (20 Feb 2003)
Step back to see how science and humanity fit in the big pictureNature Correspondence (14 Sep 2000)
See all 9 matches for Research