Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 438, 559 (1 December 2005) | doi:10.1038/438559c; Published online 30 November 2005
nature jobs
Dean, Faculty of Science
- University of Victoria
- Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Business Devlopment Officer
- Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals
- Selaqui-Dehradun India
Evaluation bias hits women who aren't twice as good
Marlene Zuk1 & Gunilla Rosenqvist2
- Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
- Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
In your Editorial "All things equal" (Nature 437, 296; 2005) and Special Report "Small steps towards campus child care" (Nature, 446–447; 2005), much was made of the need for women scientists to have access to good child care if they are to succeed. However, this recent attention to child care in the scientific workplace merely addresses a symptom, rather than a cause, of under-representation of women in science.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

