Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 438, 559 (1 December 2005) | doi:10.1038/438559c; Published online 30 November 2005
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Professor of Microscopy (W2)
- Friedrich-Schiller-University
- Jena Germany
Gastroenterology Fellowship Position - Research Track
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Texas, USA
Evaluation bias hits women who aren't twice as good
Marlene Zuk1 & Gunilla Rosenqvist2
- Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA
- Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
In your Editorial "All things equal" (Nature 437, 296; 2005) and Special Report "Small steps towards campus child care" (Nature, 446–447; 2005), much was made of the need for women scientists to have access to good child care if they are to succeed. However, this recent attention to child care in the scientific workplace merely addresses a symptom, rather than a cause, of under-representation of women in science.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
